Would You Accept the 2004 National Championship?

Birmingham · « **Reply #60 on:** June 10, 2010, 04:08:35 PM »

Holy shit I think I see some toilet paper in those trees. At least one of you Auburn fans has the nuts to claim it. Come on, go help him roll that thing.

JR4AU · « **Reply #61 on:** June 10, 2010, 04:13:27 PM »

Quote from: Birmingham on June 10, 2010, 04:05:48 PM

I think you guys just need a little encouragement... I'll be back...

Birmingham...

Birmingham · « **Reply #62 on:** June 10, 2010, 04:15:34 PM »

Yep, there's definitely some toilet paper in those trees.

RyanAU · « **Reply #63 on:** June 10, 2010, 04:34:18 PM »

Bamaham I have had a pretty boring day but you have kept it interesting by being an idiot all day, thank ya

GH2001 · « **Reply #64 on:** June 10, 2010, 04:35:02 PM »

Quote from: RyanAU on June 10, 2010, 04:34:18 PM

Bamaham I have had a pretty boring day but you have kept it interesting by being an idiot all day, thank ya

Does Jumbo know your dog is a virgin?

Snaggletiger · « **Reply #65 on:** June 10, 2010, 04:36:25 PM »

Quote from: Birmingham on June 10, 2010, 04:06:49 PM

ROLL-IT ROLL-IT ROLL-IT ROLL-IT ROLL-IT ROLL-IT ROLL-IT ROLL-IT ROLL-IT ROLL-IT ROLL-IT

God will strike me down...I know this...but I lol'd.

Jumbo · « **Reply #66 on:** June 10, 2010, 04:38:16 PM »

Quote from: GH2001 on June 10, 2010, 04:35:02 PM

Does Jumbo know your dog is a virgin?

Fisting coming his way.....

AWK · « **Reply #67 on:** June 10, 2010, 04:44:36 PM »

Quote from: Birmingham on June 10, 2010, 04:01:58 PM

Nobody is claiming the NCAA declares champions but in no way does that make the BCS not the authority. Why can't you guys answer the simple question?

Are you National Champions? If you were, what reason is there to avoid the question? So, how about it? National Champs?

Let me help you there waterhead.

“We’ll claim a title if a Laundromat in Tuscaloosa says we’re No. 1.” - Bear Bryant

Now, following Sidewalk Alumni logic such as yours...

"Come, follow me," ~~Jesus~~Bear Bryant said, "and I will make you fishers of men."

So, if we claim it, does that mean we are following the one who died for our hounds tooth?

Birmingham · « **Reply #68 on:** June 10, 2010, 05:16:48 PM »

AWK, is Auburn the National Champions?

Birmingham · « **Reply #69 on:** June 10, 2010, 05:24:57 PM »

This thread is 5 pages deep and in needs of a couple indisputable facts. Let's hear your answers to this.

1) The AP has already announced that, regardless of what the NCAA finds, they're not changing their champion.
2) The BCS has Oklahoma in 2nd place and said they'll wait until after the NCAA ruling before they decide to make a decision on if USC keeps it.

wesfau2 · « **Reply #70 on:** June 10, 2010, 05:26:44 PM »

Quote from: Birmingham on June 10, 2010, 05:24:57 PM

This thread is 5 pages deep and in needs of a couple indisputable facts. Let's hear your answers to this.

1) The AP has already announced that, regardless of what the NCAA finds, they're not changing their champion.
2) The BCS has Oklahoma in 2nd place and said they'll wait until after the NCAA ruling before they decide to make a decision on if USC keeps it.

Uh....facts don't require answers?

and...

I'm Ron Burgundy?

AWK · « **Reply #71 on:** June 10, 2010, 05:38:47 PM »

Quote from: Birmingham on June 10, 2010, 05:16:48 PM

AWK, is Auburn the National Champions?

We gonna rock down to electric avenue, and let me take it higher.

Birmingham · « **Reply #72 on:** June 10, 2010, 06:32:28 PM »

Quote from: AWK on June 10, 2010, 05:38:47 PM

We gonna rock down to electric avenue, and let me take it higher.

That's what I like to hear. Claim that bitch while not giving a single mother fuck what anyone says about it!

AuburnChopper 3.0 · « **Reply #73 on:** June 10, 2010, 07:00:17 PM »

Quote from: Birmingham on June 10, 2010, 05:24:57 PM

1) The AP has already announced that, regardless of what the NCAA finds, they're not changing their champion.

Where is this? Haven't seen it yet. Not calling you out, or saying you're wrong, but where did you find this statement?

Birmingham · « **Reply #74 on:** June 10, 2010, 07:05:14 PM »

AP
http://bit.ly/afjaMK

Quote

AP sports editor Terry Taylor told USA TODAY in an email that Southern Cal would remain as national champion for 2004.

BCS
http://bit.ly/ciVt2E

Quote

We take the integrity of NCAA rules seriously. As a procedural matter, the BCS Presidential Oversight Committee (POC) must meet to formally consider vacating USC's championship title and the game records. If the POC takes such action, there would be no BCS champion for the 2004-05 season.

Birmingham · « **Reply #75 on:** June 10, 2010, 07:10:09 PM »

That's why I say if you're gonna claim it, start doing it, and don't base it on anything either of these two bowls have to say about it. I obviously realize none of you care what I think but I believe Auburn to be the best collegiate football team in 2004 and because of that were the 2004 National Champions. I support that opinion because of what they did on the field and what I believe they would've done had they been given the opportunity to. No collegiate team proved otherwise.

The Prowler · « **Reply #76 on:** June 10, 2010, 07:32:48 PM »

Quote from: Birmingham on June 10, 2010, 03:03:35 PM

The answer to both of you is no. Now for my question to both of you. Are you or aren't you National Champions?

Yes....YES!!! NATIONAL CHAMPIONS!!!!!!! BITCHES!!!!!!!!!!!! BOOM MUTHA FUCKA....YEEEEAAAHHHH!!!!!!!!!!

jmar · « **Reply #77 on:** June 10, 2010, 07:38:52 PM »

Quote from: The Prowler on June 10, 2010, 07:32:48 PM

Yes....YES!!! NATIONAL CHAMPIONS!!!!!!! BITCHES!!!!!!!!!!!! BOOM MUTHA phukA....YEEEEAAAHHHH!!!!!!!!!!

The Prowler with his best Howard Dean response.

djsimp · « **Reply #78 on:** June 10, 2010, 11:47:45 PM »

Quote from: Birmingham on June 10, 2010, 07:10:09 PM

That's why I say if you're gonna claim it, start doing it, and don't base it on anything either of these two bowls have to say about it. I obviously realize none of you care what I think but I believe Auburn to be the best collegiate football team in 2004 and because of that were the 2004 National Champions. I support that opinion because of what they did on the field and what I believe they would've done had they been given the opportunity to. No collegiate team proved otherwise.

Even in your most anal responses, this I actually believe. The problem I have with claiming it is not be able to play for it and yes that is a damn shame. The 04 team we had was the shiznit and it still makes me mad.

GH2001 · « **Reply #79 on:** June 11, 2010, 09:45:03 AM »

Quote from: djsimp41 on June 10, 2010, 11:47:45 PM

Even in your most anal responses, this I actually believe. The problem I have with claiming it is not be able to play for it and yes that is a damn shame. The 04 team we had was the shiznit and it still makes me mad.

Well, until the BCS came into being, this is how it was crowned every year - with a vote after bowl season. Even before that, it was crowned before bowl season. So I dont feel too bad. To me we won it on the field all year long. Look at who Oklahoma played versus us. And even though the BCSCG doesnt count now - it does show you that Oklahoma was not even in the same league as USC - cheaters or not. USC could have made that game much worse had they wanted to.