Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Kaos' way behind movie reviews

Kaos

  • *
  • 29118
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3000 on: October 27, 2019, 11:31:03 AM »

so bad it made the game seem better?
Different level of hell. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

GH2001

  • *
  • 23663
  • I'm a Miller guy. Always been. Since I was like, 8
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3001 on: October 28, 2019, 08:41:29 AM »
After K reviewed the new Pet Semetary I decided to watch it. I was indifferent to it. Like any other King novel-to-movie there is probably more to it than the movie is able to convey. Or just refuses to display. I knew going in it wouldn’t be a blockbuster so I just enjoyed it. Also enjoyed the differences in the original. Not good. Not bad. Just meh. 

So it being Halloween - and it being a time I like on the calendar - I decided to catch the original two Pet Semetary movies last night on some channel. Dare I say they were both better than the new one. This was only the second time I had seen #2. Which I had no idea was filmed in newnan ga - right up 85 from auburn. 

Like K says a lot - it’s very hard to do a king novel and be able to convey the multiple dimensions and levels of the dudes head. Knowing that helps to enjoy his movies more not expecting as much. 

My Halloween party also is better than his. Regardless of what he says. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
WDE

Kaos

  • *
  • 29118
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3002 on: October 28, 2019, 10:20:22 AM »
After K reviewed the new Pet Semetary I decided to watch it. I was indifferent to it. Like any other King novel-to-movie there is probably more to it than the movie is able to convey. Or just refuses to display. I knew going in it wouldn’t be a blockbuster so I just enjoyed it. Also enjoyed the differences in the original. Not good. Not bad. Just meh.

So it being Halloween - and it being a time I like on the calendar - I decided to catch the original two Pet Semetary movies last night on some channel. Dare I say they were both better than the new one. This was only the second time I had seen #2. Which I had no idea was filmed in newnan ga - right up 85 from auburn.

Like K says a lot - it’s very hard to do a king novel and be able to convey the multiple dimensions and levels of the dudes head. Knowing that helps to enjoy his movies more not expecting as much.

My Halloween party also is better than his. Regardless of what he says.
I'm sure yours is.  I'm Hallow Claus.  I don't have a party.  Just hundreds of people show up at my house to get treats. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

GH2001

  • *
  • 23663
  • I'm a Miller guy. Always been. Since I was like, 8
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3003 on: October 28, 2019, 08:49:01 PM »
I'm sure yours is.  I'm Hallow Claus.  I don't have a party.  Just hundreds of people show up at my house to get treats.
I kid. From the tales I’ve heard and seen in pics, I can’t touch it. Its getting better each year but still not K level Halloween fest.  
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
WDE

Kaos

  • *
  • 29118
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3004 on: October 29, 2019, 12:17:11 AM »
Banana Splits Movie

Full disclosure:  When I was a little kid, I freaking LOVED The Banana Splits.  The show only lasted two years, but those two years were in my little kid sweet spot. 1968-70. 

It was corny, it was goofy.  It was Hanna Barbera's first attempt at live action.  A big dorky dog, a groovy monkey, a dopey lion(?) and a snorky elephant made up the cast that was some sort of faux band with a hippie vibe.  They wore weird red and yellow helmets and sunglasses. It was essentially an hour long kid's variety show.  There were cartoons, a live action cliff-hanger serial (starring Jan Michael Vincent) and skits by the big puffy animal band.  What's not to like?



This year, the Splits got a movie.  And it's nothing like what you'd think. 

In this new world, the Splits have been running continuously since 1969.  The costumed characters have been replaced by animatronics.  And in a twist worthy of KISS Meets the Phantom of the Park/Westworld, the robots turn deadly. 

The Banana Splits turn from a fun-loving, slapstick troupe of humanimals into a blood-lusting band of killers. 

It's not the direction I would have taken it, but I've seen worse movies (3 From Hell comes to mind).  It's also not something you'd probably enjoy unless you were at least somewhat versed in the antics of the original Banana Splits. 

Tra la la, la la la laaaaaa.  And if you're not singing that in your head?  Don't bother with this one.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

Kaos

  • *
  • 29118
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3005 on: November 12, 2019, 10:24:57 AM »
Van Helsing
I respect the hell out of Universal's original monster lineup.  Those old Frankenstein, Wolfman, Mummy and Dracula movies are pretty bad in retrospect, but for their time they were ground-breaking.  Boris, Bela, Lon (Chaney Jr, walking with the queen) set the standard for horror.  Throw in classics like Phantom of the Opera and Creature from the Black Lagoon and Universal became the original godfather of the genre. 

In fits and starts, they've tried to resurrect that status.  But movies like the unwatchable Tom Cruise Mummy abortion and the Jackman/Beckinsale misfire Van Helsing prove that the studio no longer has the vision and just can't be trusted with the future of the monster mythology. 

They had a really good start with Brendan Fraser's 1999 Mummy movie which was just the right mix of humor, action and pseudo history.  Mummy 2 wasn't bad either. But the studio fumbled away the goodwill and potential franchise-builder by shoehorning a "let's make The Rock a Star" sword and sandal Scorpion King mess in there.  They'd have been better off using the Mummy springboard to revive a Dracula or Frankenstein offering. 

Actually, maybe that's what Van Helsing was come to think of it.  It came out in 2004 and perhaps it was Universal's lame ass attempt to reinvigorate the Dracula mythology.  If so, it pissed its own pants. 

The movie had so many problems. 

1) The casting of Dracula was horrible. Terrible, terrible choice.
2) Beckinsale's terrible here-and-gone accent. 
3) Dismal storytelling. Hinted at backstory but never delivered. Squeezed in multiple cliches.
4) No sense of time. 
    4a) Beckinsale's brother turns into a werewolf and there's a full moon.  Three days (roughly) later, Jackman gets bitten and he's a wolf.  With another full moon.  The second in less than a week.  Bullshit.
    4b) Inject this cure by the stroke of last stroke of midnight!  The clock begins to chime.  A 20-minute battle ensues, people cross lengthy foot bridges and swing through the air.  And yet we still haven't gotten to that 12th stroke.
5) No sense of space.  Burst through a magic wall and walk into a snowscape.  Flakes drifting softly from the sky.  Minutes later?  It's pouring rain and lightning is hammering the castle they enter. 

I could go on. 

The point is that Universal had bankable stars in Beckinsale and Jackman as well as the budget to create a franchise launching blockbuster. Rather than breathe life into the monster genre, it layered it in mounds of cheese, slathered it in nonsense and simply pissed the opportunity away. 

The rumor is that the studio is planning an enormous homage to the monster movie at its new theme park in Orlando.  Supposedly the focal point will be a recreation of Dracula's castle.  As a fan of the monster movie I'd really like to see that. Based on how badly they've misused the coin and goodwill they have as the originator of the monster movie genre?  I don't have much hope for it. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

Kaos

  • *
  • 29118
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3006 on: November 21, 2019, 04:30:20 PM »
Earthquake Bird

Alicia Vikander is Lucy, an American trying to assimilate into Japanese culture for reasons that are eventually explained.  She's accused of murdering a friend and romantic rival.  The movie details her involvement with a man and a friend who eventually became her enemy over the affections of the guy and maybe also someone she was privately attracted to and wanted to wiggle on. 

How they made this woman I think is extremely attractive look so plain and frumpy, I'll never know.  But they did.   

The story moves very slowly, painstakingly showing all the events that led to a dead body and the assumption that Lucy might have done her harm. 

The problem is that it's just boring.  There are a few twists at the end (and if you're paying attention, you'll see them coming from miles away) but by the time you get there it's moved so slowly -- like a small rowboat paddling along a river of syrup -- that it doesn't have the payoff it might. 

So much of the movie is in Japanese, that you can't really look away because you're missing some subtitle that might be important (or not). 

Best part of the movie is Vikander. She does a really good job of portraying an emotionally fragile woman who might or might not be driven to murder.  She also speaks a lot of Japanese in the movie, which couldn't have been easy.  
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

Kaos

  • *
  • 29118
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3007 on: December 04, 2019, 11:05:22 AM »
The Irishman

I was really looking forward to this Netflix release.  Martin Scorsese bringing together Robert DeNiro, Joe Pesci, Al Pacino, Harvey Keitel, Bobby Canavale, Katherine Narducci (who I LOVED as Charmaine Bucco in Sopranos), and Jesse Plemons in a mob movie.   What could possibly go wrong?  It seemed like a combination of Godfather + Casino + Pulp Fiction + Sopranos + Oz + Breaking Bad.  If they'd just tossed in Ray Liotta and Goodfellas, it would have been perfect -- or so I would have thought. 

I didn't make it past the first 30 minutes.  Horrible.  Just awful.  

1. I couldn't separate DeNiro the actor from DeNiro the deranged asshole who spouts anti-American rhetoric and is a vulgar, ignorant fuckwad.  I despise him personally.  Can still watch Godfather, Casino and Goodfellas and keep those separate because that came before, but I simply couldn't make that distinction here.  Fuck this guy.  

2. They used some really tacky and ill-fitting CGI age transformation techniques that tried to turn old crusty DeNiro into a younger version of himself.  All that accomplished was to come off looking like the dead-eyed creepy kids in Polar Express.  It was really bad and distracting.  

3. Pesci looks really sick.  He's shriveled, wrinkled and wasted away.  Something was weird about his face and mouth.  Again, really distracting and I just couldn't get past it.  

4. It's three and a half hours long.  Maybe it gets better later, but the first 30 minutes were mind-numbingly boring.  I just didn't want any more of it. Turned it off. 

5. If I could have gotten past my absolute loathing of DeNiro, the shockingly bad CGI and the disturbing look of Pesci their performances (or what I saw of them) were awful.  Like caricatures of the people they used to be; ill-fitting suits they once wore and tried on again just for fun.  They are so far past their prime that the performances I saw seemed more like actors trying to pretend to be them and coming across as wooden imitators rather than the real thing.  DeNiro was particularly awful, mugging and shrugging and smirking like any one of a hundred comedians who've done a DeNiro "you talkin' to me?" take.  

I know there are people who love this movie and will defend it as the glorious bookend to the Godfather, Casino, Goodfellas pantheon.  I'm not one of them.  

I was truly excited to watch this movie and bitterly, bitterly disappointed in the god-awful trudge I endured for what little I could stand.  

Also?  Fuck Robert DeNiro.  
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

GH2001

  • *
  • 23663
  • I'm a Miller guy. Always been. Since I was like, 8
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3008 on: December 04, 2019, 01:51:30 PM »
The Irishman

I was really looking forward to this Netflix release.  Martin Scorsese bringing together Robert DeNiro, Joe Pesci, Al Pacino, Harvey Keitel, Bobby Canavale, Katherine Narducci (who I LOVED as Charmaine Bucco in Sopranos), and Jesse Plemons in a mob movie.  What could possibly go wrong?  It seemed like a combination of Godfather + Casino + Pulp Fiction + Sopranos + Oz + Breaking Bad.  If they'd just tossed in Ray Liotta and Goodfellas, it would have been perfect -- or so I would have thought.

I didn't make it past the first 30 minutes.  Horrible.  Just awful. 

1. I couldn't separate DeNiro the actor from DeNiro the deranged asshole who spouts anti-American rhetoric and is a vulgar, ignorant fuckwad.  I despise him personally.  Can still watch Godfather, Casino and Goodfellas and keep those separate because that came before, but I simply couldn't make that distinction here.  Fuck this guy. 

2. They used some really tacky and ill-fitting CGI age transformation techniques that tried to turn old crusty DeNiro into a younger version of himself.  All that accomplished was to come off looking like the dead-eyed creepy kids in Polar Express.  It was really bad and distracting. 

3. Pesci looks really sick.  He's shriveled, wrinkled and wasted away.  Something was weird about his face and mouth.  Again, really distracting and I just couldn't get past it. 

4. It's three and a half hours long.  Maybe it gets better later, but the first 30 minutes were mind-numbingly boring.  I just didn't want any more of it. Turned it off.

5. If I could have gotten past my absolute loathing of DeNiro, the shockingly bad CGI and the disturbing look of Pesci their performances (or what I saw of them) were awful.  Like caricatures of the people they used to be; ill-fitting suits they once wore and tried on again just for fun.  They are so far past their prime that the performances I saw seemed more like actors trying to pretend to be them and coming across as wooden imitators rather than the real thing.  DeNiro was particularly awful, mugging and shrugging and smirking like any one of a hundred comedians who've done a DeNiro "you talkin' to me?" take. 

I know there are people who love this movie and will defend it as the glorious bookend to the Godfather, Casino, Goodfellas pantheon.  I'm not one of them. 

I was truly excited to watch this movie and bitterly, bitterly disappointed in the god-awful trudge I endured for what little I could stand. 

Also?  Fuck Robert DeNiro. 
I still like the Deer Hunter. Only because he’s so young in it that I forget it’s him. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
WDE

bgreene

  • ***
  • 1551
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3009 on: December 11, 2019, 02:08:32 PM »
The Irishman

I was really looking forward to this Netflix release.  Martin Scorsese bringing together Robert DeNiro, Joe Pesci, Al Pacino, Harvey Keitel, Bobby Canavale, Katherine Narducci (who I LOVED as Charmaine Bucco in Sopranos), and Jesse Plemons in a mob movie.  What could possibly go wrong?  It seemed like a combination of Godfather + Casino + Pulp Fiction + Sopranos + Oz + Breaking Bad.  If they'd just tossed in Ray Liotta and Goodfellas, it would have been perfect -- or so I would have thought.

I didn't make it past the first 30 minutes.  Horrible.  Just awful. 

1. I couldn't separate DeNiro the actor from DeNiro the deranged asshole who spouts anti-American rhetoric and is a vulgar, ignorant fuckwad.  I despise him personally.  Can still watch Godfather, Casino and Goodfellas and keep those separate because that came before, but I simply couldn't make that distinction here.  Fuck this guy. 

2. They used some really tacky and ill-fitting CGI age transformation techniques that tried to turn old crusty DeNiro into a younger version of himself.  All that accomplished was to come off looking like the dead-eyed creepy kids in Polar Express.  It was really bad and distracting. 

3. Pesci looks really sick.  He's shriveled, wrinkled and wasted away.  Something was weird about his face and mouth.  Again, really distracting and I just couldn't get past it. 

4. It's three and a half hours long.  Maybe it gets better later, but the first 30 minutes were mind-numbingly boring.  I just didn't want any more of it. Turned it off.

5. If I could have gotten past my absolute loathing of DeNiro, the shockingly bad CGI and the disturbing look of Pesci their performances (or what I saw of them) were awful.  Like caricatures of the people they used to be; ill-fitting suits they once wore and tried on again just for fun.  They are so far past their prime that the performances I saw seemed more like actors trying to pretend to be them and coming across as wooden imitators rather than the real thing.  DeNiro was particularly awful, mugging and shrugging and smirking like any one of a hundred comedians who've done a DeNiro "you talkin' to me?" take. 

I know there are people who love this movie and will defend it as the glorious bookend to the Godfather, Casino, Goodfellas pantheon.  I'm not one of them. 

I was truly excited to watch this movie and bitterly, bitterly disappointed in the god-awful trudge I endured for what little I could stand. 

Also?  Fuck Robert DeNiro. 
Agreed!!
I watched maybe 20 min of this and couldn't get past the failed age transformation.  On top of that, they tried to make RD a tough guy buy kicking the crap out of some fella, which failed because RD couldn't move that fast without breaking a hip.  Every one of them need to remember how old they are, and take rol...retire, they need to retire.  I don't know how anyone could watch this crap and think it was worth releasing.  Hallmark and Lifetime have better actors, stunt doubles, director and special effects!!
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"Men are made stronger on the realization that the helping hand they need is at the end of their own arm."

                -Sidney Phillips

Kaos

  • *
  • 29118
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3010 on: December 22, 2019, 02:35:55 AM »
Rambo: From First to Last Blood

The original Rambo (which didn't have Rambo in the title) was an undervalued movie.  It told the story of a war hero struggling to adapt to life in the civilian world who was pushed beyond his limits and retaliated against a system that was stacked against him.  Good action sequences. Sylvester Stallone at his best. Jumping off the cliff, bouncing through the tree limbs and then sewing up his own arm?   

Rambo: First Blood II was a completely different movie.  Same guy, but a vastly changed scenario.  This was Stallone at his steroid-fueled peak, chiseled and freakishly cut. Here he mowed through pretty much all of Vietnam and a military establishment that considered him expendable -- and sent him on a suicide mission.  

Rambo III?  I don't remember it at all. By the time it came out, the genre had worn thin. The world was a different place in 1988.  Die Hard was the only "action movie" (and its a classic) that moved the needle.  Bankable action star Arnold had moved on to Twins with Danny Devito rather than continue his Predator/Commando career arc. It did big box office, finishing top 20 for the year, but was pretty derivative.  Felt like the character had run its course.  

Rambo disappeared for 20 years when the better-than-I-expected film simply titled 'Rambo' showed up.  This film found the beleaguered warrior wrestling cobras in the jungle, hiding from his past, trying to bury the violence that was his legacy.  He was forced back into the fray by a vicious warlord and a naive but well-intentioned group of missionaries that were captured by his thugs.  It was one of the more violent movies I've ever seen toward the end with multiple shots of legs, arms and torsos being blown apart. But I enjoyed it far more than I probably should have.  I could actually see the Rambo character ending up exactly where he did, ditching society for a stripped-down jungle life. 

That brings us to Rambo: Last Blood which, in my opinion, should never have been made.  It begins with Rambo on some sort of ranch, wearing a fucking cowboy hat, riding a fucking horse.  There's some half-baked backstory about how he took on the role of surrogate father for this hispanic teenager when her dad abandoned her.  No explanation of how he left the jungle to become Josey Wales, no real exposition on how he met this family, how he came to take on the parental role, why he dug a bunch of fucking rat-tunnels on his property -- other than all those set pieces were needed to provide convenient plot points. It didn't come close to explaining how the guy got from sweaty jungle cobra wrangler to prancing cowpoke with an adopted family in the span of ten short years. It just didn't fit.  

The story-telling was incredibly lazy.  Doors were opened and then half closed without any realistic or rational motivation. It was just stupid.  Particularly jarring was the "journalist" who rescued him from his first botched (and ignorant) effort to free his sorta-daughter from a dangerous group of pimps and gangsters. Other than allegedly moving the plot along, her character was a waste. Nothing but cheesy lines badly delivered.  

Basic storyline:  Teen quasi-daughter ignores "Uncle John's" ominous warnings and heads to Mexico to find her deadbeat dad and confront him over running out on her.  Once there, she runs into trouble with a sex-trafficking ring headed by some cartoonish yahoos. Rambo heads across the border to start some shit. Things go badly.  Sex traffickers are pissed off.  Rambo does a Home Alone montage as he booby-traps his property and the traffickers are polite enough to wait until he's set all the Kevin-ish traps before they come after him.  People die in creative ways. 

I've always liked the Rambo character.  This was just a complete affront to the history.  Cowboy Rambo was a murderous, raging fuck. He mutilated people for sport. He made stupid decisions that cost people around him dearly.  

This movie has no place in the Rambo pantheon.  It should be scrubbed from existence and never mentioned again.  It's the Caddyshack 2, the Christmas Vacation 2, the Christmas Story 2 of the Rambo series. It was just lazy, sloppy and pointless.  I'm going to have to go back and re-watch First Blood to get this shit stain out of my mind.  

It's time for Rocky, Creed and Rambo to go away and never return.  

friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

CCTAU

  • *
  • 12865
  • War Eagle!
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3011 on: December 22, 2019, 12:11:40 PM »
Whatever!
If he dies...He dies!
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Five statements of WISDOM
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating the wealth out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friends, is the beginning of the end of any nation.

Godfather

  • Chapter
  • ****
  • 21263
  • He knows!
    • Tigers X
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3012 on: December 23, 2019, 10:33:21 AM »
Rambo: From First to Last Blood

No explanation of how he left the jungle to become Josey Wales, no real exposition on how he met this family, how he came to take on the parental role, why he dug a bunch of fucking rat-tunnels on his property -- other than all those set pieces were needed to provide convenient plot points.

I was expecting this movie to be contrived and a paycheck for the nearly unwatchable bloated piece of chewed up meat that is Stallone.  At least Arnold still has facial features and can actually speak.  Your review was on point save for one critique, the above. 

It was his dad's horse ranch.  It's where he was trying to get home in the original.  In Rambo (Burma/Snake Guy) he realizes no matter where he goes he will never outrun his past so he decides to head home.  The last cuts scene of Rambo (Burma) he is shown walking down the road that leads to the horse ranch with the house in the background.  This movie is supposed to 10-11 years after those events.  He has a successful horse ranch with the old woman who is his business partner, that's all we really know about her other than she was a family friend because she worked with Rambo's dad as well.
« Last Edit: December 23, 2019, 10:35:52 AM by Godfather »
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Gus is gone, hooray!
                       -Auburn Fans


Auburn Forum

Snaggletiger

  • *
  • 43993
  • My Fighting Pearls
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3013 on: December 23, 2019, 11:00:40 AM »
First Blood is one of my "Flipping channels and Hey, First Blood is on." movies.  Kind of like Shawshank.  (No, First Blood is not on that level).  It's just one of those that I'm going to stop and watch just about every time.  I think the setting, presumably in the mountains of Washington/Oregon, somewhere like that, is what brings a lot of the appeal for me.  
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
My doctor told me I needed to stop masturbating.  I asked him why, and he said, "because I'm trying to examine you."

Godfather

  • Chapter
  • ****
  • 21263
  • He knows!
    • Tigers X
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3014 on: December 23, 2019, 11:19:21 AM »
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Gus is gone, hooray!
                       -Auburn Fans


Auburn Forum

Kaos

  • *
  • 29118
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3015 on: December 23, 2019, 01:09:58 PM »
https://youtu.be/Z-8vsTw4yQ4?t=105
Well damn.  I had forgotten the end.  Thanks for reminding me how it ties in. I retract that portion of the review. 

Man he got old over the last decade though.    
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

Godfather

  • Chapter
  • ****
  • 21263
  • He knows!
    • Tigers X
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3016 on: December 23, 2019, 01:43:16 PM »
Well damn.  I had forgotten the end.  Thanks for reminding me how it ties in. I retract that portion of the review.

Man he got old over the last decade though.   
My biggest gripe of the movie was when he was in Mexico and those guys didn't shoot him.  I would have rather they made some stupid non-sensical impossible Rambo goes off and rescues the girl at that time, then they go after him and try to get her back (cue to underground mines). 

Rather than hey lets beat the shit outta this guy and not kill him....tha fuck....you are in Mexico.  Shoot the motherfucker in the head.  /rollcredits
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Gus is gone, hooray!
                       -Auburn Fans


Auburn Forum

Kaos

  • *
  • 29118
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3017 on: December 23, 2019, 06:45:42 PM »
My biggest gripe of the movie was when he was in Mexico and those guys didn't shoot him.  I would have rather they made some stupid non-sensical impossible Rambo goes off and rescues the girl at that time, then they go after him and try to get her back (cue to underground mines). 

Rather than hey lets beat the shit outta this guy and not kill him....tha fuck....you are in Mexico.  Shoot the motherfucker in the head.  /rollcredits
Mine really started before that.  In what world does Rambo just roll up in the middle of that, completely unprepared, and get the shit kicked out of him anyway?
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

Kaos

  • *
  • 29118
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3018 on: December 23, 2019, 09:30:20 PM »
Klaus

Netflix ventures into animation with a Christmas movie.  

It's a re-imagining of the creation of the Santa Claus phenomenon.  It all starts with a postmaster and ends with a little unanticipated magic.  

I've got to be honest, I wasn't a big fan of the animation style.  I think the whole exercise could have benefited from a different look to the characters. I had a real problem with the look of the old granny and the big bloated kids of the feuding family clans that were central to the movie's plot.  But once I settled into it and forgot the weird way some things looked, it was a pretty easy movie to digest.  

It moved along pretty well, kept the story going even though a lot of the events were fairly predictable.  You could see most of it coming from the beginning, just maybe not the particular manner in which it played out.  

Most of the way I sort of felt like it was just innocuous -- another well-meaning addition to the lengthy pantheon of animated Christmas movies.  I figured it fell somewhere in the Arthur Christmas, Rise of the Guardians territory.  

But then the last five minutes or so -- and particularly the last line of the film -- hit me in the feels area.  That brief final act elevated the movie.  I won't watch it over and over and over again like I do Charlie Brown Christmas or Grinch (60s version, not that Jim Carrey abomination or the dumtarded Benzoprene Cumpledump garbage), but I will add it to my regular holiday rotation.  I'll hit it once every season at minimum. It's something I hope to one day sit down to watch with my grandkids (if I ever have any).   


Sidebar:  In a curious strategy, movie merchandise was marketed almost exclusively through Old Navy.  You didn't see it in Target, Wal Mart, Kohls, Dillards, Macys, Nordstroms or much of anywhere else.  As it happens, I was in Old Navy on the 15th looking for something and the place was literally stuffed with Klaus merchandise.  It was everywhere and I had no idea what it was. I had to take back what I'd gotten today and there was hardly any of it left.  The entire store was basically stripped of the tie-in merchandise (primarily socks and pajamas).  I'm talking empty shelves.  I asked the clerk what happened and her theory was that people had finally gotten around to watching the movie over the weekend once school was out for the holidays. That led to a serious run on it.  She said that over a span of about two days they went from thinking they'd have to send back more than half of what they'd gotten to having people freak out because they didn't have more.  Odd.  All the way around.  
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

Kaos

  • *
  • 29118
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Reply #3019 on: December 24, 2019, 01:14:19 AM »
Godzilla: King of the Monsters

The star power was lined up for this sequel to Godzilla (2014) which was a relatively decent movie.  Kyle Chandler (Friday Night Lights), Horseface Farmiga (Lots of stuff), Bradley Whitford (West Wing), Ken Watanabe (Inception), O'Shea "Ice Chip" Jackson (Straight Outta Compton), Sally 'Fish Fucker' Hawkins (Shape of Water), Charles 'Lannister' Dance (Game of Thrones), Thomas 'Pied Piper' Middleditch (Silicon Valley) and David 'I bagged Carmella' Stratharian (Sopranos, etc.) were among those assembled to deal with Gojira and the MUTOS.  

This was supposed to be the jumping off point for a planned Godzilla/Kong crossover which might also possibly include Mothra, Rodan and other legendary Japanese monsters.  

Boy, did they screw it up.  It was almost like Zack Snyder's idiot ass got hold of it and befouled it with his moronic 'vision.' 

First let me say that I've always had an affinity for the Godzilla genre.  I used to watch the terrible old Japanese black and white movies (which were just a guy in a suit stomping on cardboard cities).  I've always thought the Godzilla roar was pretty cool. In fact, I've had it as a ringtone in the past.  I didn't loathe the 1998 Ferris Bueller version as many did.  I kinda sorta liked seeing the big guy rampaging through NYC. And that movie gave us a soundtrack which featured Puff Daddy rapping over Jimmy Page and Kashmir as well as the Wallflowers covering Bowie's song Heroes (which was a great cover). But I digress. Allow me to return now to King of the Monsters, the 2019 follow-up to the Godzilla reboot that rolled out in 2014.  

In the first place, the movie was just boring.  There was so much muddled mumbo jumbo about the ORCA, which was supposed to transmit some kind of telepathic waves (or something) to the creatures.  Chandler struggled to express any emotion other than malaise. The film relied far too heavily on wonky science and dramatic doomsday proclamations. The majority of that was nonsensical. Many times I found myself drifting off, thinking of other things and paying little to no attention to what was happening on the screen. It just wasn't compelling. It should have been. 

Yeah, the big monsters fought and fought. Unfortunately so much of that fighting occurred amid clouds of dust or in blue night-time haze making the action difficult to discern, much less follow.  Doing it in slow motion (which seemed to happen frequently) didn't clear any of that up.  I was completely underwhelmed by the one thing in the film that HAD to be right.  The dragons in GOT were better rendered. 

And another thing.  NO movie should have TWO dramatic self-sacrifices set to somber music and tearful slow motion responses.  One is typically overload.  But two?  Seriously.  Try something else.   

I expected to be entertained.  When I saw that the film was directed by the same guy who helmed Krampus (a Christmas favorite) I was looking forward to seeing what he could do with this material.  The answer is apparently nothing.  This had none of the humor or humanity that Krampus does. It's just a slow, noisy, destructive slog to nowhere.  

I'm still holding out hope that somehow, somewhere somebody can breathe new nuclear life into this genre.  I want to see Kong face off against Gojira -- or the two team up to stop Mothra.  But it has to be better than this soggy, sloppy, dull effort.  

friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.