Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports
The Library => The SGA => Topic started by: GarMan on March 01, 2012, 11:47:07 AM
-
Natural causes?
Anyway, something to remember him...
http://www.youtube.com/v/lbycMtTUDfE
-
I have some opinions on this. I will hold onto most of them. Something just reeks about this.
And yes, I absolutely loved Breitbart. He's what every American should be. A true patriot.
-
I have some opinions on this. I will hold onto most of them. Something just reeks about this.
And yes, I absolutely loved Breitbart. He's what every American should be. A true patriot.
We may have the same opinions, GH. I just heard an interview with Breitbart on Hugh Hewitt's radio talk show just last night; he said some things in that interview that really give me pause to think about his untimely death. This does reek.
Natural causes?
...
Glad that you posted on this shocking news, GarMan. Breitbart was truly a pioneer in the new media.
-
I've never heard of him.
-
I've never heard of him.
He started as editor for the tiny, little aggregation website called The Drudge Report. Then started the news site Breitbart.com followed by BigGovernment.com, BigHollywood.com, Breitbart.tv, BigJournalism.com, and BigPeace.com. Ironically he also helped start the Huffington Post before it went left-wing lunatic fringe.
-
I've never heard of him.
Guy made it his job to expose corruption in government or related to government. He brought down ACORN and was able to tie them to Obama. He also exposed the plot to frame the tea partiers as saying racial slurs at rallies. He offered up 100K to anyone who could prove that any tea partier used a racial slur at a rally - no one ever was able to. The guy had guts and pissed many people off in a position of power because he exposed them. True warrior.
-
We may have the same opinions, GH. I just heard an interview with Breitbart on Hugh Hewitt's radio talk show just last night; he said some things in that interview that really give me pause to think about his untimely death. This does reek.
Also, see his CPAC speech 3 weeks ago. Chilling.
-
Guy made it his job to expose corruption in government or related to government. He brought down ACORN and was able to tie them to Obama. He also exposed the plot to frame the tea partiers as saying racial slurs at rallies. He offered up 100K to anyone who could prove that any tea partier used a racial slur at a rally - no one ever was able to. The guy had guts and pissed many people off in a position of power because he exposed them. True warrior.
Great reminders. His death is truly vexing. He really was one of the good guys.
-
We shall drink a beer for him Saturday TH. To Breitbart!
Also, stay class liberals. From the Daily KOS:
Andrew Breitbart was a brutal, revolting, disgusting piece of trash who undermined this country and represented the worst of American politics. None of us will ever have to worry about the workings of his evil ways again. He is done. He will be remembered not for whatever good was in him but for being a destroyer of our way of life. He wasted his life and made our lives that much harder. The world is better off and brighter without him. Good riddance.
Don't mistake my relief for glee. I'm not glad he's dead. I am relieved. It is a great relief to me to be able to say those few words--whose relevance and veracity no one can honestly dispute.
I sympathize with the bereaved. Most of us know what it is like to be personally bereaved. It sucks. Other people, by their bias or ignorance, saw Breitbart in a different light. We are all entitled to our own perceptions. I would never give my opinion of Andrew Breitbart at his funeral (as if I would even go), and I don't support dancing on other people's graves.
Rather, Breitbart's passing is a one-time occasion to condemn him for the evil he did to this world, and then to let go of our resentment of him for his crimes. With these few words I hereby accomplish exactly that, at least for myself. The people who say "now isn't the time" or "it isn't respectful" can go suck a lemon. They do not know what they are talking about. If we would ethically show quiet respect for a person in death, then our enmity toward that person in life was wrong. And if the enmity was not wrong, then quiet respect is hypocritical, and an abrogation of our obligation to bear witness to history.
What exactly did he do that was "evil"? Oh yeah, he exposed crooked people for what they were. Also forgot THS, that he is the one that uncovered the Anthony Weiner scandal.
-
We shall drink a beer for him Saturday TH. To Breitbart!
...
Definitely. Look forward to it.
...
Also, stay class liberals. From the Daily KOS:
...
I would expect no less from that side of the political spectrum; but, I have to admit that I just might say the same things about Bill Maher if this had happened to him.
...
What exactly did he do that was "evil"? Oh yeah, he exposed crooked people for what they were. Also forgot THS, that he is the one that uncovered the Anthony Weiner scandal.
It wasn't just the moonbat, lefties and socialist Dems that despised him; one of the news reports that I read also pointed out that he'd absolutely infuriated the Establishment Republicans last year by inviting the gay Republican Group, GOProud, to CPAC.
-
I thought that I'd add that in Hugh Hewitt's interview of Breitbart last night he started with a lighter question asking him what rock concerts that he'd thought that the Republican candidates had attended in their youth, his responses showed a little of his humor; Newt Gingrich: 'The Eagles', Mitt Romney: 'Donny and Marie', and Rick Santorum: 'Helen Reddy'. I admit to chortling at that answer...but, then again, I'm a political addict.
-
I thought that I'd add that in Hugh Hewitt's interview of Breitbart last night he started with a lighter question asking him what rock concerts that he'd thought that the Republican candidates had attended in their youth, his responses showed a little of his humor; Newt Gingrich: 'The Eagles', Mitt Romney: 'Donny and Marie', and Rick Santorum: 'Helen Reddy'. I admit to chortling at that answer...but, then again, I'm a political addict.
I thought Santorum would have been The Gaithers or Jimmy Swaggert.
-
I thought Santorum would have been The Gaithers or Jimmy Swaggert.
I chortled.
-
I chortled.
Donny and Marie was pretty funny. Partridge Family would have also been acceptable for Mitt.
-
Donny and Marie was pretty funny. Partridge Family would have also been acceptable for Mitt.
Now you're just being ugly. Might as well have said The Monkeys.
Wait. What?
-
Rush's memorial to Breitbart, worth the read:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/03/01/andrew_breitbart_bulldog_for_the_cause (http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/03/01/andrew_breitbart_bulldog_for_the_cause)
-
...
Anyway, something to remember him...
...
Great video! Some of my favorite quotes from this speech:
Barack Obama is a radical. We should not be afraid to say that.
...
I don't care who the candidate is. Ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate!
...
When I walk through CPAC or travel the United States to meet people in the Tea Party who care; black, white, gay, and straight; anyone that's willing to stand next to me to fight the Progressive Left; I will be in that bunker with you and if you're not in that bunker because you're not satisfied with that candidate more than shame on you! You're on the other side!
...
MSNBC, we're watching. And listening. You're going to have a hell of a time in 2012 because America has finally awoken to your Saul Alinsky, bullshit tactics, we're coming to get you.
...
Andrew Breitbart, CPAC, 2012
-
This may surprise a lot of you, but I liked this guy.
The video above is not a good example of this, but typically, he was cool, calm, and collected when voicing his opinion with conviction and indignation. I admired that he did not bullshit, whatsoever. He appears pretty belligerent in the video posted above, but hey, he's playing to CPAC, so that's to be expected.
I also admired that, where a lot of conservatives won't go on MSNBC or shows like Real Time with Bill Maher, because they claim they don't want to dignify and legitimize them (but, to me, usually appear to be more out of fear that they will be made to look foolish), Breitbart would do these types of shows, guns blazing. And he didn't compromise what he was saying one bit for the liberal studio audience.
Here he is on msnbc, in some appearances that I feel was more characteristic of him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63TMawHivXQ# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63TMawHivXQ#)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NEYsYgjnrg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NEYsYgjnrg#ws)
And I too saw the "natural causes" report. There's nothing natural about a death at 43 in the year 2012.
-
This may surprise a lot of you, but I liked this guy.
The video above is not a good example of this, but typically, he was cool, calm, and collected when voicing his opinion with conviction and indignation. I admired that he did not bullshit, whatsoever. He appears pretty belligerent in the video posted above, but hey, he's playing to CPAC, so that's to be expected.
I also admired that, where a lot of conservatives won't go on MSNBC or shows like Real Time with Bill Maher, because they claim they don't want to dignify and legitimize them (but, to me, usually appear to be more out of fear that they will be made to look foolish), Breitbart would do these types of shows, guns blazing. And he didn't compromise what he was saying one bit for the liberal studio audience.
Here he is on msnbc, in some appearances that I feel was more characteristic of him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63TMawHivXQ# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63TMawHivXQ#)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NEYsYgjnrg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NEYsYgjnrg#ws)
And I too saw the "natural causes" report. There's nothing natural about a death at 43 in the year 2012.
Damn. We agree in the SGA. Unreal.
But yeah, what you said. I like anyone who comes out guns a blazing and does truth telling, even if it appears bizarre. The guy basically busted up a child prostitute ring, unmasked a lying piece of garbage Congressman and exposed Nancy Pelosi for orchestrating a false campaign to bring down her opposition including lying. And as TH said, he also pissed off much of the GOP establishment at times by calling a spade a spade. Kudos to him. I will miss his brand of honesty.
-
Check this shit out.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/breitbarts-last-investigation-obama/ (http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/breitbarts-last-investigation-obama/)
Breitbart's last investigation? Obama
'I've got videos from his college days…'
Breitbart, the influential founder of BigGovernment.com, BigJournalism.com and other innovations in reporting whose sudden death today stunned the world of journalism, had been investigating President Obama.
Breitbart told a crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last month that he had obtained videos of Obama from the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee’s college days.
The videos have not been made public, and a WND request to Breitbart’s organization did not elicit any immediate information about when they might be unveiled.
Later, Fox News’ Sean Hannity interviewed Steve Bannon, who is producer of “The Undefeated,” about the tapes.
Bannon told Hannity that the videos do exist, were taken during Obama’s time at Harvard, and will be released in a “week or two.”
“I’ve got videos, by the way. This election we’re going to vet him. I’ve got videos – this election we’re going to vet him – from his college days to show you why … racial division and class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008,” Breitbart told CPAC.
He said the videos will come out and reveal Obama during a time when he was meeting a “bunch of silver ponytails” – referring to Weather Underground terror group members Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.
It was in the couple’s Chicago home that Obama’s political career reportedly was launched, and his ties to the two run deep. There’s been a solid argument made that Ayers ghost-wrote Obama’s highly acclaimed memoir, “Dreams from My Father.”
The possibility of videos producing revelations about Obama’s college days is significant, as Obama has carefully kept concealed evidence about his life during the time he reportedly attended Occidental College in California and later two East Coast schools.
A lawsuit at one point obtained an order for Occidental to reveal Obama’s student records. The aim was to find out whether he obtained aid or assistance as a foreign student, lending credibility to the argument that he does not qualify to be president under the Constitution’s “natural-born citizen” requirement.
The statement:
The issue of Obama’s eligibility was addressed today when an investigative team commission by Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., said there is probable cause that the document released by the White House last year as President Obama’s birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery.
At a news conference today, lead investigator Mike Zullo said his team believes the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in a systematic effort to hide from public inspection any original 1961 birth records it may have in its possession.
“Officers of the Hawaii Department of Health and various elected Hawaiian public officials may have intentionally obscured 1961 birth records and procedures to avoid having to release to public inspection and to the examination of court-authorized forensic examiners any original Obama 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not have,” Zullo said.
Dr. Jerome Corsi, the author of several books on Obama, said at Arpaio’s news conference that he was able to help facilitate Breitbart’s request to interview Arpaio only hours before Breitbart’s death.
-
Did Scott Moore write that article?
-
Did Scott Moore write that article?
I get what you're saying, but everything Breitbart has ever promised came to light with a video, audio or picture eventually. You were probably being sarcastic, but they aren't even comparable on journalistic integrity. I would compare Scott Moore closer to Alex Jones.
-
This may surprise a lot of you, but I liked this guy.
The video above is not a good example of this, but typically, he was cool, calm, and collected when voicing his opinion with conviction and indignation. I admired that he did not bullshitake, whatsoever. He appears pretty belligerent in the video posted above, but hey, he's playing to CPAC, so that's to be expected.
I also admired that, where a lot of conservatives won't go on MSNBC or shows like Real Time with Bill Maher, because they claim they don't want to dignify and legitimize them (but, to me, usually appear to be more out of fear that they will be made to look foolish), Breitbart would do these types of shows, guns blazing. And he didn't compromise what he was saying one bit for the liberal studio audience.
...
And I too saw the "natural causes" report. There's nothing natural about a death at 43 in the year 2012.
I too am shocked that you liked the guy. Like you I admire the fact that he wasn't afraid to take the political fight to the faces of the left and go on MSNBC and Real Time along with other moonbat, lefty media outlets. I know that there's an old saying about the graveyard being full of indispensable people but he truly was one-of-a-kind in the political world in my opinion. I don't know of anyone that can take his place but at least the legacy of work that he leaves behind has a life of it's own.
I try to be rational when it comes to conspiracies but I'm really having a difficult time with the uncanny timing of his death. But, I guess at the end of the day it's a reminder that we're not guaranteed that we'll make it to the parking lot.
Thanks for posting those great videos.
-
I try to be rational when it comes to conspiracies but I'm really having a difficult time with the uncanny timing of his death. But, I guess at the end of the day it's a reminder that we're not guaranteed that we'll make it to the parking lot.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/war/top_secret_weapon_lethal (http://www.wanttoknow.info/war/top_secret_weapon_lethal)
There are hyper-links in the actual article.
Top Secret Lethal Weapon
A Secret Weapon of the CIA Causes Heart Attacks
Dear friends,
A top secret lethal weapon of the CIA is used for conducting clandestine assassinations without leaving a trace of evidence. This specially designed secret weapon is a pistol which shoots a small poison dart to cause a heart attack, as explained in Congressional testimony in a short video clip from a powerful documentary on the CIA. By educating ourselves and others on vitally important matters like this, we can build a brighter future for us all.
The dart from this secret CIA weapon penetrates clothing and leaves nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target.
The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn't it? Yet all of this is verifiable in Congressional testimony.
The astonishing information about this secret weapon of the CIA comes from U.S. Senate testimony in 1975 on rogue activities of the CIA. This weapon is only one of many James Bond-like discoveries of the Church Committee hearings, officially known as the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities.
Could this or a similar secret weapon have been used, for instance, in the death of 52-year-old Mark Pittman, a reporter who predicted the financial crisis and exposed Federal Reserve misdoings? Pittman, whose fight to open the Federal Reserve to more scrutiny led Bloomberg News to sue the central bank and win, died of a heart attack on Nov. 25, 2009. How many other alleged heart attacks may have been secret political assassinations?
Watch the one-minute video at this link for the description of a former CIA secretary and Congressional testimony on this top secret weapon. To watch the revealing 45-minute documentary from which the above clip was taken, click here. In this riveting exposé, five former CIA agents describe how their initial pride and enthusiasm at serving their nation turned to anguish and remorse, as they realized that they were actually subverting democracy and killing innocent civilians all in the name "national security" and promoting foreign policy agendas.
The above-mentioned testimony is from 1975, several decades ago. With the ensuing leaps in technological capability, just imagine what kinds of secret weapons for assassination have been developed since. There is good evidence that technology has even been developed to cause strong suicidal feelings in a targeted person. For more on this, read powerful information on nonlethal weapons at this link.
The box below provides several ideas on what you can do to further educate yourself on top secret weapons, CIA mind control projects, and more. We also invite you to think about these things and invite discussion with your friends and colleagues. Does the public deserve to know about such secret programs? Can we trust that such deadly weapons are being used for the good of the nation and world, and not for selfish ends? By spreading the word, we can make a big difference and build a brighter future for ourselves and our children.
-
One difference between him and, say, Anne Coulter, was that for example in that Bashir interview, where the interviewer clearly had an agenda, when he showed him the Obama monkey picture (that had nothing to do with him) or mentioned that guy that wrote a piece for Breitbart's website, he didn't defend it, he said it was deplorable. He didn't snidely go "Oh, what's the big deal, get over it." He condemned it and exposed the fallacious tactic Bashir was using. I like that he didn't defend everything the right did, just to defend it. He called it like he saw it. To me, it made his arguments stronger when he wasn't crying wolf all the time.
-
Talk show host Michael Savage is not afraid to ask the questions:
Michael Savage: Was Breitbart assassinated?
1 March 2012 WND
Noting that the cause of Andrew Breitbart’s unexpected death yesterday was being examined by the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office, talk-radio host Michael Savage raised the question of whether the conservative media powerhouse – who recently announced he had videos that could politically damage President Obama – was murdered.
On his top-rated show today, Savage played an audio clip of Breitbart telling an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last month that he had obtained videos that shed light on Obama’s ties to radicals in the early 1980s who helped propel him to the presidency.
“Maybe my overly active imagination kicked into overdrive,” Savage told his listeners of his decision to raise the question. “But you heard what Breitbart said – he has videos … we’re going to vet the president.”
Breitbart reportedly was walking near his home in Brentwood, Calif., just after midnight this morning when he collapsed. A neighbor saw him fall and called 911. Emergency crews tried to revive him and rushed him to the emergency room at the UCLA Medical Center.
It’s entirely plausible, Savage acknowledged, that Breitbart simply collapsed of a heart attack because of overwork and a reported history of health problems.
“I’m asking a crazy question,” Savage said, “but so what? We the people want an answer. This was not an ordinary man. If I don’t ask this question, I would be remiss.”
Breitbart told the CPAC crowd last month that the videos would reveal Obama during a time when he was meeting a “bunch of silver ponytails” – referring to Weather Underground terror group members Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.
Ayers and Dohrn reportedly launched Obama’s political career with a fundraiser in their Chicago home.
Savage noted that Breitbart had dinner with Ayers and Dorhn three weeks ago at the couple’s Hyde Park residence on Chicago’s South Side, which is near Obama’s home. Breitbart was invited by Daily Caller Editor-in-Chief Tucker Carlson, who won an Internet auction for a dinner party with the couple.
“I’ve got videos – this election we’re going to vet him,” Breitbart said at CPAC, promising they would show how “racial division and class warfare are central” to the “hope and change” that Obama”sold in 2008.”
“He threatened the president at CPAC with video that could derail the president’s campaign,” Savage said.
“I pray it was natural causes, but we’ll never know the truth.”
Savage said that if Breitbart’s colleagues have the videos, they should post them as soon as possible and make them viral “or they’ll never see the light of day.”
Savage said he hadn’t spoken with Breitbart for the past two years, but he recalled the media mogul’s visited to his home in the Bay Area.
“He spoke for three straight hours,” Savage said. “I was unable to say a word.”
Savage also attended a party at Breitbart’s Los Angeles home.
“I told him two years ago to get a body guard. Never be alone in the street,” Savage said.
Savage, the author of the bestselling novel “Abuse of Power,” put on his novelist hat and speculated about ways a murderer could remain undetected by inducing a heart attack that didn’t leave any traces.
A caller from Savage’s native New York City said there’s a simple way to find out what happened.
“If the tapes come out, he died of a heart attack,” the caller said. “If the tapes don’t come out, they whacked him.”
Full story:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/michael-savage-was-breitbart-assassinated/ (http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/michael-savage-was-breitbart-assassinated/)
-
This part.....
ways a murderer could remain undetected by inducing a heart attack that didn’t leave any traces.
....is what scares me. It could look totally like a natural death on an Autopsy. Someone who already has a health issue is a perfect candidate to be assassinated with a means that could simply aggrevate the current health issue.
-
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/breitbart-obama-college-video-turns-dud-sparks-race-172252336.html (http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/breitbart-obama-college-video-turns-dud-sparks-race-172252336.html)
.......Breitbart’s Obama college video turns out to be a dud, sparks race debate
.
.
By Dylan Stableford
Senior Media Reporter
http://video.pbs.org/video/2207363899 (http://video.pbs.org/video/2207363899)
Andrew Breitbart's promised video of Barack Obama's college days at Harvard University was released in full on Sean Hannity's Fox News show on Wednesday night—and unlike the late conservative provacateur's other video hits, this one appears to be a bit of a dud.
The video—which sent some conservatives into a frenzy when Breitbart told an audience at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) last month that he had the footage—shows Obama, then a Harvard law student, introducing former Harvard Law Professor Derrick Bell, who Breitbart.com editor-in-chief Joel Pollak called the "Jeremiah Wright of academia."
Harvard law professor Charles Ogletree had the footage from 1990 and is shown presenting it to an audience after the 2008 election. "I hid this during the 2008 campaign," Ogletree can be heard saying. "I don't care if they find it now."
Pollak and conservatives contend that the video is another example of Obama's history of chumminess with radicals, and the proof of the left's continuing efforts to cover it up.
But as PBS' Andrew Golis noted, "there's nothing new about the clip or Obama's role in the controversy at Harvard Law School."
"In 2008, as a part of our quadrennial election special The Choice 2008," Golis wrote, "Frontline ran the same footage of the speech as a part of an exploration of Obama's time at Harvard Law School, where he graduated in 1991. It's been online at our site and on YouTube since then." Golis added that Frontline obtained the footage from the archives of WGBH, PBS' Boston affiliate. (More on the back story.)
"Is that it?" Soledad O'Brien asked Pollak in an interview on Thursday morning. "What part of that was the bombshell? Because I missed it."
Pollack responded: "The bombshell is the revelation of the relationship between Obama and Derrick Bell ... [Derrick Bell] passed away last year, but during his lifetime he developed a theory called critical race theory, which holds that the Civil Rights movement was a sham and that white supremacy is the order and it must be overthrown."
The interview quickly devolved into an argument over the definition of critical race theory, with Jay Thomas, a Sirius radio host and a panelist on O'Brien's show, jumping into the fray.
"Can I say something as a white person?" Thomas asked Pollak. "What are you frightened of? Are you frightened that some black people are going to do something to you? ... What do you think Barack Obama's going to do? Is there a secret black movement that's going to start killing white people?"
The conversation got worse from there. "I'm glad you played the racism card," Pollak fired back. "You've accused me of being a racist. You've accused me of being afraid of black people. And it doesn't deserve a response. But let me respond anyway. I'm not afraid black people are going to be violent and take over the country. What I'm pointing out is that there's a pattern in Barack Obama's associations with Derrick Bell, with Reverend Wright, and it carries over into his governance because his Justice Department won't treat black civil rights violators the same way it treats white civil rights violators."
Journalists took to Twitter to poke fun at the controversy. "Breitbart's CPAC speech = Lana Del Ray's 'Video Games' video," Slate's Dave Weigel wrote on Twitter. "Actual Obama tape = Lana Del Ray on 'SNL.'"
On CNN, Pollak promised more footage and more bombshells from Breitbart's archives. "This is the beginning of a vetting process that begins with Andrew Breitbart's probe into Barack Obama's time in Chicago and will continue," he said.
-
Well, for one - I knew the media would hop on this and diminish it no matter what it was. I thought it was pretty damning to be the keynote speaker at a Rally supporting a Marxist Black Liberation Professor and "opening your heart" to his way of thinking.
And two, its March. The Breitbart folks are smart. Does anyone really think this is all they have? At CPAC Breitbart said "we have tapes" - plural. The one from last night may be the most mild of the bunch.
And in re: to this quote:
"What are you frightened of? Are you frightened that some black people are going to do something to you? ... What do you think Barack Obama's going to do? Is there a secret black movement that's going to start killing white people?"
This guy has obviously never heard of the black power or black seperatist movements. Ya know? Black panthers who stand at polling places with billy clubs threatening to beat the shit out of any white person who doesn't vote for Obama in the name of Black Liberation Theology. No threat at all.
-
I highly doubt that this is the tape, or only tape, that was being referenced.
-
The dude was MER-DER-D.
Kennedy murdered folks. The Clintons murdered folks. Surprise that The One's political enemies would drop mysteriously dead?
-
The dude was MER-DER-D.
Kennedy murdered folks. The Clintons murdered folks. Surprise that The One's political enemies would drop mysteriously dead?
I'm reporting you to ATTACKWATCH.COM for making such a suggestion.