Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

The Library => The SGA => Topic started by: Kaos on September 27, 2016, 12:11:18 AM

Title: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 27, 2016, 12:11:18 AM
Skewed by Lester Holt to bolster Hillary.  She looked like a condescending bitch.  He looked like he was barely holding in his disdain for her. 

Nobody won, but if you HAVE to declare a winner?  Much as I hate to say it, probably her. 

He had an easy opening when she talked about her great knowledge of cyber security.  Didn't just look at her and giggle then ask about her emails. 

I don't like her at all. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: bottomfeeder on September 27, 2016, 12:14:58 AM
I was hoping the old bag would croak during the debate. Fuck her with a large penith until she bleeds.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on September 27, 2016, 12:36:07 AM
He is setting her up.

Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 27, 2016, 03:16:07 AM
One thing I caught in the revealing of tax returns...

Trump stated that Clinton has squandered tax dollars, etc, etc.

Clinton responded with, "maybe because you haven’t paid any federal income tax in a lot of years."

Trump immediately says, “It would be squandered too, believe me.”

There's a word there that caught my attention and should catch everyone else's..."WOULD" as in he hasn't paid what he owes the government.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 27, 2016, 07:57:34 AM
One thing I caught in the revealing of tax returns...

Trump stated that Clinton has squandered tax dollars, etc, etc.

Clinton responded with, "maybe because you haven’t paid any federal income tax in a lot of years."

Trump immediately says, “It would be squandered too, believe me.”

There's a word there that caught my attention and should catch everyone else's..."WOULD" as in he hasn't paid what he owes the government.

You are obsessed with people not giving you enough money.  Don't you realize that neither Bernie nor Hillary would give YOU one red cent of the money they'd love to bleed from American businesses?  It would all go to them because they're 'dead broke.'  Can't live on a couple million a year and never actually working.  It's a tough life.  You should give more of your money so they don't have to earn any. 

You're so easily duped it's scary. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 27, 2016, 07:58:20 AM
I was hoping the old bag would croak during the debate. Fuck her with a large penith until she bleeds.

There was one point where she either had a stroke or pissed her pants. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 27, 2016, 08:31:33 AM
You are obsessed with people not giving you enough money.  Don't you realize that neither Bernie nor Hillary would give YOU one red cent of the money they'd love to bleed from American businesses?  It would all go to them because they're 'dead broke.'  Can't live on a couple million a year and never actually working.  It's a tough life.  You should give more of your money so they don't have to earn any. 

You're so easily duped it's scary.
You are so blinded by your hatred towards Hillary to realize that Trump and however many Billions that he says that he's worth HAS NOT PAID THE GOVERNMENT WHAT HE OWES. He's not the only one, I'm sure Hillary hasn't paid either, but she's not blabbing about how rich she is and how she uses the loopholes to get away with not paying what she owes...like the rest of America that aren't among the 1%. Also, she didn't insinuate on National TV that she hasn't paid what she owes, unlike Trump.
So, you can take the "free handout" shit and shove it back up your ass. IMO, if you want to live here you should have to pay what you owe in taxes, just like everyone else.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 27, 2016, 08:37:19 AM
Trump on Twitter: Nothing on emails. Nothing on the corrupt Clinton Foundation. And nothing on #Benghazi. #Debates2016 #debatenight



(https://cdn.meme.am/instances/56283193.jpg)
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 27, 2016, 08:42:58 AM
You are so blinded by your hatred towards Hillary to realize that Trump and however many Billions that he says that he's worth HAS NOT PAID THE GOVERNMENT WHAT HE OWES. He's not the only one, I'm sure Hillary hasn't paid either, but she's not blabbing about how rich she is and how she uses the loopholes to get away with not paying what she owes...like the rest of America that aren't among the 1%. Also, she didn't insinuate on National TV that she hasn't paid what she owes, unlike Trump.
So, you can take the "free handout" shit and shove it back up your ass. IMO, if you want to live here you should have to pay what you owe in taxes, just like everyone else.

Really?

Just what does he "owe?"   Whatever you say he does?  What his accountants determine he does? 

Right now, if I didn't pay expensive accountants to help me find and exploit every advantage, my tax rate because I own my own business would be over 30%.  One third of the money I work hard to make goes to greedy pigs like Hillary and Obama who have never spent a single day of their lives doing anything of substantive value. 

And people like you think we should pay more? 

Why?  So people who pay no taxes can get money back thanks to "earned income credits" and other government dole outs?

Well fuck you, buster. 

If I could figure out a way to legally reduce my taxes to zero?  I'd damn sure do it.   I don't mind paying, but it should be equal.  I shouldn't pay substantially more because I have the initiative to be successful.  And I shouldn't get more because I have no initiative and make less. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: wesfau2 on September 27, 2016, 09:03:02 AM
Holt was ineffectual as a moderator.

It was sloppy at best.  On both sides.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 27, 2016, 09:04:53 AM
Oddly enough every poll other than CNN that I can find shows Trump winning the debate by a 60-40 margin. 

Is this an indicator that Trump supporters are more enthusiastic and willing to vote in polls -- a trait that will carry over to actual polling?

Is this an indicator that there are more Trump supporters than the media imagines when given the opportunity to express themselves anonymously -- like at the actual polls?

Is this an indicator that Trump actually scored points among the undecided?

I wish he had taken a swipe at all of the low-hanging fruit that was out there and that she opened herself up for.  Looked to me like he was struggling not to be seen as being mean to a woman (which she isn't).  I hope he watches this film, learns from it, and eviscerates the bitch the next time out. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 27, 2016, 09:09:29 AM
Holt was ineffectual as a moderator.

It was sloppy at best.  On both sides.

No.  I disagree there.  He was blatantly schilling for Whorelary.  How many follow ups did he ask her? 

Why were the topics "birther controversy" (which isn't even a real thing) instead of benghazi; "were you for the war 20 years ago?" instead of immunity for your conspirators? 

It was absolute bullshit and based almost entirely on HER talking points.  Fuck Lester Holt. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: wesfau2 on September 27, 2016, 09:13:39 AM
No.  I disagree there.  He was blatantly schilling for Whorelary.

Disagree.  You're seeing what you want.

Oddly enough every poll other than CNN that I can find shows Trump winning the debate by a 60-40 margin. 

Is this an indicator that Trump supporters are more enthusiastic and willing to vote in polls -- a trait that will carry over to actual polling?

Is this an indicator that there are more Trump supporters than the media imagines when given the opportunity to express themselves anonymously -- like at the actual polls?

Is this an indicator that Trump actually scored points among the undecided?

I wish he had taken a swipe at all of the low-hanging fruit that was out there and that she opened herself up for.  Looked to me like he was struggling not to be seen as being mean to a woman (which she isn't).  I hope he watches this film, learns from it, and eviscerates the bitch the next time out. 

It's an indicator that older white people are the only people that still carry a landline and answer surveys.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 27, 2016, 09:16:43 AM
Disagree.  You're seeing what you want.

It's an indicator that older white people are the only people that still carry a landline and answer surveys.

So topics like "birther" and "what did you say about the war 20 years ago on Howard Stern" are okay, as is not mentioning any of the many albatrosses she carries around? Got it.

Most of the post-debate polls are online polls. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on September 27, 2016, 09:31:20 AM
Really?

Just what does he "owe?"   Whatever you say he does?  What his accountants determine he does? 

Right now, if I didn't pay expensive accountants to help me find and exploit every advantage, my tax rate because I own my own business would be over 30%.  One third of the money I work hard to make goes to greedy pigs like Hillary and Obama who have never spent a single day of their lives doing anything of substantive value. 

And people like you think we should pay more? 

Why?  So people who pay no taxes can get money back thanks to "earned income credits" and other government dole outs?

Well fuck you, buster. 

If I could figure out a way to legally reduce my taxes to zero?  I'd damn sure do it.   I don't mind paying, but it should be equal.  I shouldn't pay substantially more because I have the initiative to be successful.  And I shouldn't get more because I have no initiative and make less.

I use as many loopholes as I can find. People who do not pay "what they owe" usually end up in jail. Ask Mr. Snipes.

Trump knows the system is dung. He wants to simplify it. The millions he saves on accountants will be worth it! But I guess that is just the government creating more jobs....
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: GH2001 on September 27, 2016, 11:12:36 AM
So topics like "birther" and "what did you say about the war 20 years ago on Howard Stern" are okay, as is not mentioning any of the many albatrosses she carries around? Got it.

Most of the post-debate polls are online polls.

It's why you deflect and keep hammering on issues and failures of your opponent. His pride got the better of him on the tax and birther issues. Newt did a perfect job of this in 2012 when the first question was about his divorce. He slammed the moderator and it was mentioned no more. He won the night by telling the mods it was out of line and to fuck off. I was shocked when trump didn't do the same.

Also a YUGGGGE mistake agreeing with her on guns and the no fly list. I bet the Nra lost their shit on that one.

Good commentary from Matt Walsh:

Quote
About tonight's horrific spectacle:

For the first 30 minutes, Trump was great. In fact I was legitimately impressed. He put Hillary on the defensive and she responded by cackling and stammering and flashing an evil grin like Nurse Ratched from One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. Hillary is absolutely awful when you take her off her script. She knows how to do what she practiced, but she doesn't know how to respond like a regular human person when she's backed into a corner.

Unfortunately, the debate was not 30 minutes. It was 90 minutes. And those last 60 were a disaster for Trump. Period. And if you want him to win, you need to criticize him now and stop pretending everything he touches is gold. Or he will lose. Badly. That's the situation. Time to deal with it.

Trump let Hillary get away with virtually every lie she told. She shrugged off her email scandal by calling it a mistake and Trump did not follow up. Later she spoke about the need for cyber security and Trump didn't even bother bringing up that Clinton kept an unsecure server in her freaking bathroom.

Trump was put on the defensive on a number of issues and he didn't handle the situation well. He rambled and babbled and allowed the discussion to stay on his own scandals and controversies rather than pivoting to Hillary.

Hillary blatantly called Trump a racist -- THREE TIMES -- and Trump had no retort, except to tell some strange story about how he hired some minorities once or something and it made him feel good. I don't know. I couldn't follow.

The subject turned to policing and racial issues and Trump never brought up the fact that Hillary has pandered to the mob and endangered police lives. Hillary also put the mother of an attempted cop killer on stage at her convention, but of course Trump made no mention of that.

Trump basically allowed Hillary to get away with everything, and only tried to hold her feet to the fire at the end for producing "not nice" ads about him. That's what he got her on. Not Benghazi, not the emails, not speaking fees or anything else. Only that she was "not nice" in some ads.
 
He did briefly bring up the DNC's railroading of Bernie Sanders but then stepped on his own point by transitioning that into a conversation about how his son likes to play computer games.

I will give him credit for one good line. When Hillary attacked Trump for stiffing some contractors who worked on one of his hotels, Trump shot back: "Yeah well Ambassador Stevens was your employee and he's dead now."

Just kidding. Trump didn't say that. He just rambled for another 12 minutes while Hillary silently gave praise to Satan.

It was unbearable to witness, especially because I could see the glee seeping out of Clinton's face. She can't believe her luck. She's a corrupt, lying, half-humanoid crook with a lifetime of scandal to her name, and the Republican nominee had little interest in talking about any of that tonight. Instead he spent 60 minutes defending his casinos and explaining why he should be given credit for making Obama release his birth certificate.

Again: If you want Trump to win, you need to be honest about this. Because if he continues with this strategy -- if you can call it that -- he will be crushed in November.

As for me, I don't know if I can even watch the next debate. I can't physically stomach watching Hillary win. Nobody deserves to lose more than her. But not everyone gets what they deserve in life. And Hillary couldn't be happier about that.

Final debate grades:

Hillary: F

Trump: F

Primary voters: F

America: Doomed

My bourbon bottle: empty

Apocalypse: can't come soon enough
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: AUChizad on September 27, 2016, 01:08:47 PM
When Hillary nailed Trump for saying he believed climate change was a hoax perpetuated by the Chinese, he blurted "I NEVER SAID THAT" several times.

He said it right here:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/265895292191248385

(https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/uDFmIDPzCo4znxgzKlT0_jgv4CqHkarUrQ005ED_HbclD4Ex32hmOHsAn95kbFc_WZMiOQ1BMlRj4Fu-vDLyOgnT3syuxfWFY8KxoEWpqd9gxcPzZnQUM8q76jkJzs7IQUNr_cUt)

The media will rightfully pummel him for that. But what about Hillary's similar lies about positions one of them held in the past?

Trump nailed her for lauding the TPP as "the gold standard for trade deals". She said she never said that at all, and never really supported it, only that she was hopeful it would work out.
Quote
"So it's fair to say that our economies are entwined, and we need to keep upping our game both bilaterally and with partners across the region through agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership or TPP. Australia is a critical partner. This TPP sets the gold standard in trade agreements to open free, transparent, fair trade, the kind of environment that has the rule of law and a level playing field. And when negotiated, this agreement will cover 40 percent of the world's total trade and build in strong protections for workers and the environment."

Trump told the truth. She lied. Also Trump's retort after she said she was for it until it got fouled up along the way by saying "Who messed it up, Obama?" was a point for him as well.

She brought up that he was in favor of the Iraq war. First of all, it's astounding to me that this bitch who was a sitting Senator and put her actual vote in to go to war has any ground to criticize a then-TV personality for hesitantly saying "I guess...so" before criticizing the invasion.

https://youtu.be/PFZRHUG0dlU

Regardless, "unbiased" politifact and the mainstream media will pile on Trump for "lying" that he didn't supported the war, while she's permitted to act like she, an actual person in a position of power to directly facilitate the invasion, was always against it from the beginning. That's bullshit.

Also, here he a couple months later expounding on it to Fox News. He clearly opposed it early.

https://youtu.be/ThwaDSaoGU8

Clinton said Trump invited Putin to hack Americans. First of all, he "invited" him to hack her and her specifically, not all Americans. As often as "Heeyyyy he was joking!!" is misappropriated to some awful shit Trump says, this is not one of them. He was asked if he thought Putin was behind the DNC leak and he joked that if he was, hopefully he'll go after Hillary's emails next. Politifact scores that one to Clinton too. I disagree.

She said "The only years that anybody's ever seen" of Trump’s tax returns "showed he didn't pay any federal income tax." That is false. In the five years of taxes she's referring to, three of them showed he did pay federal income tax, and the other two years, he didn't because in accordance with tax rules, he lost millions of dollars those years. He did what is legal and prudent those years.

She brought up birtherism. He mentioned that she started it. Politifact gives that one a flat-out false rating. It is established fact that it started in 2008 with Sidney Blumenthal on Hillary's behalf before Trump was ever a political figure at all. Yes, Trump made a meal out of it and blew it way the fuck out of proportion, but HER CAMPAIGN factually, started it despite what politifact or the liberal media want to pretend now.

It's amazing to me that the media is trying to memoryhole this now.
https://youtu.be/gLEy_hJaNEI

Politico admitted as much before they now deny it.
http://www.politico.com/story/2011/04/birtherism-where-it-all-began-053563

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/8478044/Birther-row-began-with-Hillary-Clinton-supporters.html

The media is twisting themselves in knots to revise history on this. It's astounding. Again, yes Trump made it a way bigger deal, but it's asinine to pretend this didn't originate in the 2008 primaries when it clearly did.

I also thought Trump's early statements on fiscal responsibility, government waste, and the crumbling infrastructure we have to show for it rang true for me. I thought he was "just tough enough" throughout most of the debate without venturing into "poo-poo pants" level insults. I think overall he did marginally better than I expected.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on September 27, 2016, 01:28:08 PM
. I think overall he did marginally better than I expected.

I think he is setting her up. he knows if he came out both barrels blasting it would turn off some of the undecideds. Sure, it would fire me up, but he already has my vote.

He is pretty good at this. i think he will give the right stuff at the right time. Do it all now ans you have nothing left, and it gives her time to use the media to make excuses. attack her just before the election, it sticks in the mind longer.

But we will see.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: GH2001 on September 27, 2016, 03:12:06 PM
When Hillary nailed Trump for saying he believed climate change was a hoax perpetuated by the Chinese, he blurted "I NEVER SAID THAT" several times.

He said it right here:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/265895292191248385

(https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/uDFmIDPzCo4znxgzKlT0_jgv4CqHkarUrQ005ED_HbclD4Ex32hmOHsAn95kbFc_WZMiOQ1BMlRj4Fu-vDLyOgnT3syuxfWFY8KxoEWpqd9gxcPzZnQUM8q76jkJzs7IQUNr_cUt)

The media will rightfully pummel him for that. But what about Hillary's similar lies about positions one of them held in the past?

Trump nailed her for lauding the TPP as "the gold standard for trade deals". She said she never said that at all, and never really supported it, only that she was hopeful it would work out.
Trump told the truth. She lied. Also Trump's retort after she said she was for it until it got fouled up along the way by saying "Who messed it up, Obama?" was a point for him as well.

She brought up that he was in favor of the Iraq war. First of all, it's astounding to me that this bitch who was a sitting Senator and put her actual vote in to go to war has any ground to criticize a then-TV personality for hesitantly saying "I guess...so" before criticizing the invasion.

https://youtu.be/PFZRHUG0dlU

Regardless, "unbiased" politifact and the mainstream media will pile on Trump for "lying" that he didn't supported the war, while she's permitted to act like she, an actual person in a position of power to directly facilitate the invasion, was always against it from the beginning. That's bullshit.

Also, here he a couple months later expounding on it to Fox News. He clearly opposed it early.

https://youtu.be/ThwaDSaoGU8

Clinton said Trump invited Putin to hack Americans. First of all, he "invited" him to hack her and her specifically, not all Americans. As often as "Heeyyyy he was joking!!" is misappropriated to some awful shit Trump says, this is not one of them. He was asked if he thought Putin was behind the DNC leak and he joked that if he was, hopefully he'll go after Hillary's emails next. Politifact scores that one to Clinton too. I disagree.

She said "The only years that anybody's ever seen" of Trump’s tax returns "showed he didn't pay any federal income tax." That is false. In the five years of taxes she's referring to, three of them showed he did pay federal income tax, and the other two years, he didn't because in accordance with tax rules, he lost millions of dollars those years. He did what is legal and prudent those years.

She brought up birtherism. He mentioned that she started it. Politifact gives that one a flat-out false rating. It is established fact that it started in 2008 with Sidney Blumenthal on Hillary's behalf before Trump was ever a political figure at all. Yes, Trump made a meal out of it and blew it way the fuck out of proportion, but HER CAMPAIGN factually, started it despite what politifact or the liberal media want to pretend now.

It's amazing to me that the media is trying to memoryhole this now.
https://youtu.be/gLEy_hJaNEI

Politico admitted as much before they now deny it.
http://www.politico.com/story/2011/04/birtherism-where-it-all-began-053563

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/8478044/Birther-row-began-with-Hillary-Clinton-supporters.html

The media is twisting themselves in knots to revise history on this. It's astounding. Again, yes Trump made it a way bigger deal, but it's asinine to pretend this didn't originate in the 2008 primaries when it clearly did.

I also thought Trump's early statements on fiscal responsibility, government waste, and the crumbling infrastructure we have to show for it rang true for me. I thought he was "just tough enough" throughout most of the debate without venturing into "poo-poo pants" level insults. I think overall he did marginally better than I expected.

The first half hour I thought he hit a home run.

The last hour? Nose dive. He took the bait and ran with it like a hungry fish.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: AUTailgatingRules on September 27, 2016, 04:05:03 PM
The first half hour I thought he hit a home run.

The last hour? Nose dive. He took the bait and ran with it like a hungry fish.

That's because the last hour was spent talking about stupid shit like birtherism and fat chicks.  She is not going to be able to win simply by talking about how bad he is.  She is going to have to come up with something positive she stands for
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: GH2001 on September 27, 2016, 04:07:26 PM
That's because the last hour was spent talking about stupid shit like birtherism and fat chicks.  She is not going to be able to win simply by talking about how bad he is.  She is going to have to come up with something positive she stands for

Yes. Him doing most of that talking. He should have responded quickly and diverted back to her. It was a tactical error. Curious to see if he will do it again at the next one. The Clinton camp made no secret that their plan was to unravel him and get him off on a tangent about something stupid. And he did it. He can't do that again.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 27, 2016, 06:59:06 PM
Oddly enough every poll other than CNN that I can find shows Trump winning the debate by a 60-40 margin. 

Is this an indicator that Trump supporters are more enthusiastic and willing to vote in polls -- a trait that will carry over to actual polling?

Is this an indicator that there are more Trump supporters than the media imagines when given the opportunity to express themselves anonymously -- like at the actual polls?

Is this an indicator that Trump actually scored points among the undecided?

I wish he had taken a swipe at all of the low-hanging fruit that was out there and that she opened herself up for.  Looked to me like he was struggling not to be seen as being mean to a woman (which she isn't).  I hope he watches this film, learns from it, and eviscerates the bitch the next time out.

"Hillary Clinton won." - http://fortune.com/2016/09/26/presidential-debate-who-won/


"You may be getting trolled right now without even knowing it.

Donald Trump supporters artificially manipulated the results of online polls to create a false narrative that the Republican nominee won the first presidential debate on Monday night." - http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/trump-clinton-debate-online-polls-4chan-the-donald/?tw=dd
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 27, 2016, 07:15:28 PM
Maybe in the next debate, Trump can refrain from snorting Coke beforehand...maybe then he'll be better prepared.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: bottomfeeder on September 28, 2016, 01:49:36 AM
There was one point where she either had a stroke or pissed her pants.

That must be the reason she hauled ass after the debate avoiding the media.
She shimmied at one point and I'm thinking she pissed herself. I'll beat that some rank smelling stuff down there.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: bottomfeeder on September 28, 2016, 02:08:09 AM
Maybe in the next debate, Trump can refrain from snorting Coke beforehand...maybe then he'll be better prepared.

He's sinuses are screwed up not because of coke. I do think he's as pissed off as I am about the state of the state. Many of the things I was ostracized about over the years on that other forum were, and are actually happening or are about to happen. I would rather I had been incorrect, however, we must fight against the ideology (MARXISM) that is taking over our country. She supports that ideology, along with others, that contradict Christianity and morality.

I'm surprised that you would favor the destruction of our history and culture in favor of that that seems dead set on taring down the very fabric of our nation. Support for such ideology is the same as lending support for terrorists. That is referred to as treason. She and Obama are guilty of treason.

Quote
18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 28, 2016, 08:37:54 AM
He's sinuses are are screwed up not because of coke. I do think he's as pissed off as I am about the state of the state. Many of the things I was ostracized about over the years on that other forum were, and are actually happening or are about to happen. I would rather I had been incorrect, however, we must fight against the ideology that is taking over our country. She supports that ideology, along with others, that contradict Christianity and morality.

I'm surprised that you would favor the destruction of our history and culture and favor that that seems death set on taring down the very fabric of our nation. Support for such ideology is the same as lending support for terrorists. That is referred to as treason. She and Obama are guilty of treason.
Smh...
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: GH2001 on September 28, 2016, 08:41:39 AM
Smh...

Everyone that sniffles should be considered a possible coke user now?

That's like saying people that can only pull machine levers for a living should be considered retards.

Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 28, 2016, 03:05:17 PM
Everyone that sniffles should be considered a possible coke user now?

That's like saying people that can only pull machine levers for a living should be considered retards.
A professed Billionaire (he's not) and continues rubbing his nose and sniffling...yeah he probably rides the 'ol white train.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: GH2001 on September 28, 2016, 03:53:29 PM
A professed Billionaire (he's not) and continues rubbing his nose and sniffling...yeah he probably rides the 'ol white train.

Link? Meme?
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: ssgaufan on September 28, 2016, 04:43:16 PM
A professed Billionaire (he's not) and continues rubbing his nose and sniffling...yeah he probably rides the 'ol white train.

As long as he's doing if off of a strippers ass, I'm ok with it.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 28, 2016, 05:57:15 PM
As long as he's doing if off of a strippers ass, I'm ok with it.
Well yeah, duhhhh...lol.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 28, 2016, 07:16:59 PM
Oddly enough every poll other than CNN that I can find shows Trump winning the debate by a 60-40 margin. 

Is this an indicator that Trump supporters are more enthusiastic and willing to vote in polls -- a trait that will carry over to actual polling?

Is this an indicator that there are more Trump supporters than the media imagines when given the opportunity to express themselves anonymously -- like at the actual polls?

Is this an indicator that Trump actually scored points among the undecided?

I wish he had taken a swipe at all of the low-hanging fruit that was out there and that she opened herself up for.  Looked to me like he was struggling not to be seen as being mean to a woman (which she isn't).  I hope he watches this film, learns from it, and eviscerates the bitch the next time out.
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/data-points/poll-majority-voters-say-clinton-won-first-presidential-debate-n656231

Hillary 52%
Neither 26%
Trump 21%

Thats gotta sting, lol.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 29, 2016, 12:15:37 AM
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/data-points/poll-majority-voters-say-clinton-won-first-presidential-debate-n656231

Hillary 52%
Neither 26%
Trump 21%

Thats gotta sting, lol.

NBC- Nothing But Clinton. 

Yeah. I put so much stock in that. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: GH2001 on September 29, 2016, 03:11:37 PM
NBC- Nothing But Clinton. 

Yeah. I put so much stock in that.

Any poll online where you can click away multiple times after clearing cache is useless. Regardless of the outcome. I've seen some say trump. Some say Hillary. And all are equally unscientific. Eye of the voter is what matters. Until the next debate anyway. Then it will all change again.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: wesfau2 on September 29, 2016, 05:16:44 PM
NBC- Nothing But Clinton. 

Yeah. I put so much stock in that.

Watching you contort is fun.

These polls are good.  Those polls are bad.

At the outset, NO polls were good.

Fly your Trump flag, hoss.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 29, 2016, 05:30:13 PM
Watching you contort is fun.

These polls are good.  Those polls are bad.

At the outset, NO polls were good.

Fly your Trump flag, hoss.

Consistently don't care jack shit about the polls.

I find the results interesting and occasionally wonder what the results are actually saying. But put zero stock in them and have been 1000% consistent on that. 

You see what you want to see.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: wesfau2 on September 29, 2016, 05:55:08 PM
Consistently don't care jack shit about the polls.

I find the results interesting and occasionally wonder what the results are actually saying. But put zero stock in them and have been 1000% consistent on that. 

You see what you want to see.



O.
K.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: GH2001 on September 29, 2016, 05:56:27 PM


O.
K.

Isn't prowler more the one pimping out the Hillary polls this page?
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: wesfau2 on September 29, 2016, 06:09:36 PM
Isn't prowler more the one pimping out the Hillary polls this page?

Wasn't looking so much at this page as referencing K's nod to the "exit" debate polls.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 29, 2016, 06:10:29 PM
Isn't prowler more the one pimping out the Hillary polls this page?

In response to Kaos caring, but not caring about polls (caring about them when he thinks that they're putting his boy at the top). Basically proving him wrong, as usual. Try to keep up.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 29, 2016, 08:48:51 PM
Wasn't looking so much at this page as referencing K's nod to the "exit" debate polls.

Look at my question.

Said I thougt Hillary the Whore had done better.  Curious about the instant reaction polls that had Trump winning. 

My interest in them extended only as far as whether those results implied something else.  Was there something to learn beyond the meaningless results.

Haven't yet and not likely to tout some shitbird poll.

You see what you need to see to assauge your liberal Nancy pants.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 29, 2016, 09:52:44 PM
Look at my question.

Said I thougt Hillary the Whore had done better.  Curious about the instant reaction polls that had Trump winning. 

My interest in them extended only as far as whether those results implied something else.  Was there something to learn beyond the meaningless results.

Haven't yet and not likely to tout some shitbird poll.

You see what you need to see to assauge your liberal Nancy pants.
I see you mentioning polls when they favor Trump, even stating that every poll you saw favored Trump, aside from the "Clinton News Network" & "Nothing But Clinton" network...meaning you searched for said polls. But when showed that those polls where more than likely just knee-jerk reaction polls from the first half of the debate and allowed for the Internet user to click on Trump's name multiple times, you resort back to your hole while mumbling "polls are meaningless...stupid, shitbird polls."
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on September 29, 2016, 11:20:09 PM
I see you mentioning polls when they favor Trump, even stating that every poll you saw favored Trump, aside from the "Clinton News Network" & "Nothing But Clinton" network...meaning you searched for said polls. But when showed that those polls where more than likely just knee-jerk reaction polls from the first half of the debate and allowed for the Internet user to click on Trump's name multiple times, you resort back to your hole while mumbling "polls are meaningless...stupid, shitbird polls."

Actually he did not have to search for polls. There were reports stating that all polls besides CNN favored Trump. He just had to click on a link or two!
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 30, 2016, 01:42:46 AM
Actually he did not have to search for polls. There were reports stating that all polls besides CNN favored Trump. He just had to click on a link or two!
Click a link or two, or three, or maybe seven.

"Every poll that I can find..."
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 30, 2016, 07:51:29 AM
Click a link or two, or three, or maybe seven.

"Every poll that I can find..."

There was one single link that contained the results of like 40 polls.  That's all I saw and was, therefore, every poll i can find. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: wesfau2 on September 30, 2016, 09:10:04 AM
I see you mentioning polls when they favor Trump, even stating that every poll you saw favored Trump, aside from the "Clinton News Network" & "Nothing But Clinton" network...meaning you searched for said polls. But when showed that those polls where more than likely just knee-jerk reaction polls from the first half of the debate and allowed for the Internet user to click on Trump's name multiple times, you resort back to your hole while mumbling "polls are meaningless...stupid, shitbird polls."

Gets it.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 30, 2016, 09:16:05 AM
Gets it.

^
Doesn't get it.  At all.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 30, 2016, 04:16:33 PM
^
Doesn't get it.  At all.
Nope. I pretty much nailed it. #BoomAllOverYourFace
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: chinook on September 30, 2016, 04:48:39 PM
Nope. I pretty much nailed it. #BoomAllOverYourFace

I liked it when you were giving out pimp cups and rope chains.  The political Prowler is like watching a kid pound a square block in the round hole.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: dallaswareagle on September 30, 2016, 04:56:33 PM
I liked it when you were giving out pimp cups and rope chains.  The political Prowler is like watching a kid pound a square block in the round hole.

I thinking more along these lines:

(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u1/miked0003/retarded-boy1.gif) (http://s164.photobucket.com/user/miked0003/media/retarded-boy1.gif.html)
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Snaggletiger on September 30, 2016, 05:03:11 PM
I liked it when you were giving out pimp cups and rope chains.  The political Prowler is like watching a kid pound a square block in the round hole.

Ever try to fit a square peg in a round hole?  Well then, you may be a homosexual.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 30, 2016, 07:34:44 PM
I just post the facts...if the truth hurts ya, good.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: GH2001 on September 30, 2016, 08:53:22 PM
Gets it.

Dude. You're smart. Don't make that alignment.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 30, 2016, 09:17:50 PM
Dude. You're smart. Don't make that alignment.
Dude. You aren't.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 30, 2016, 10:25:59 PM
I liked it when you were giving out pimp cups and rope chains.  The political Prowler is like watching a kid pound a square block in the round hole.
Hey Kaos...Chinook called you a square block.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 30, 2016, 10:34:30 PM
Let me get this straight, Kaos and other Trumpets here, are y'all perfectly fine with him not paying his Federal taxes and his involvement in human trafficking (modeling agency)?
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 30, 2016, 11:01:54 PM
Let me get this straight, Kaos and other Trumpets here, are y'all perfectly fine with him not paying his Federal taxes and his involvement in human trafficking (modeling agency)?

Damn straight. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on September 30, 2016, 11:04:48 PM
Gets it.

One day you're going to wake up, roll over, recoil in horror at what you've crawled in bed with, and do your best to sneak quietly out of the room as if you were never there. 

That's when we will remind you that we took pictures. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on September 30, 2016, 11:35:11 PM
Damn straight.
...and yet, you want to deport people that don't pay taxes and are involved in human trafficking, then build a 100 story wall across the outer skirts of Mexico, to keep them out...smh.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on October 01, 2016, 12:09:22 AM
...and yet, you want to deport people that don't pay taxes and are involved in human trafficking, then build a 100 story wall across the outer skirts of Mexico, to keep them out...smh.

Damn straight.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: GH2001 on October 01, 2016, 08:03:50 AM
Dude. You aren't.

Your lack of a grasp of any kind of facts or how things work in an economy or in govt is laughable. When in doubt you simply throw stupid insults around and link crazy "unfactual" Urls where someone just throws shit to a wall. It's funny how retarded you are, unbeknownst to your own self. And I fully expect your stupid ass to respond with another equally low Iq post to this one. Because it's all you have.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Snaggletiger on October 01, 2016, 09:00:59 AM
Your lack of a grasp of any kind of facts or how things work in an economy or in govt is laughable. When in doubt you simply throw stupid insults around and link crazy "unfactual" Urls where someone just throws shit to a wall. It's funny how retarded you are, unbeknownst to your own self. And I fully expect your stupid ass to respond with another equally low Iq post to this one. Because it's all you have.

Well now, that could possibly leave a mark.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on October 01, 2016, 03:05:44 PM
Your lack of a grasp of any kind of facts or how things work in an economy or in govt is laughable. When in doubt you simply throw stupid insults around and link crazy "unfactual" Urls where someone just throws shit to a wall. It's funny how retarded you are, unbeknownst to your own self. And I fully expect your stupid ass to respond with another equally low Iq post to this one. Because it's all you have.

Them damn corporate types don't work hard like them academic types!
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on October 01, 2016, 05:54:07 PM
Your lack of a grasp of any kind of facts or how things work in an economy or in govt is laughable. When in doubt you simply throw stupid insults around and link crazy "unfactual" Urls where someone just throws shit to a wall. It's funny how retarded you are, unbeknownst to your own self. And I fully expect your stupid ass to respond with another equally low Iq post to this one. Because it's all you have.
Everything that I've posted is facts, whether you believe or not is irrelevant. Your boy has been involved in Human Trafficiking through his pageants, he has a rape allegation, he doesn't pay federal taxes (another law that he breaks), he is a deplorable business man (this coming from business men from around the Country, ones that deal with him all the time), the guy that wrote Trump's biography shudders at the thought of him being the President. You're voting for that orange garbage bag full of shit...you really think I give a fuck what you think about me?
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on October 01, 2016, 11:13:29 PM
Everything that I've posted is facts, whether you believe or not is irrelevant. Your boy has been involved in Human Trafficiking through his pageants, he has a rape allegation, he doesn't pay federal taxes (another law that he breaks), he is a deplorable business man (this coming from business men from around the Country, ones that deal with him all the time), the guy that wrote Trump's biography shudders at the thought of him being the President. You're voting for that orange garbage bag full of shit...you really think I give a fuck what you think about me?

"Human trafficking"! LOL
Like I said earlier.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: chinook on October 01, 2016, 11:26:43 PM
"Human trafficking"! LOL
Like I said earlier.

Yes.  The hustle and bustle of NYC can cause humans and cars to coexist as traffic. It can be a nightmare crossing the George Washington or taking the Lincoln tunnel.  And I speculate Trump was in the middle of it though he probably at times flew in his whirlybird and watched the humans trafficking above.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: djsimp on October 02, 2016, 02:49:25 AM
...and yet, you want to deport people that don't pay taxes and are involved in human trafficking, then build a 100 story wall across the outer skirts of Mexico, to keep them out...smh.

What's the alternative? A women who is willing to kill the same type soldiers that protect her all for political and financial gain?
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Snaggletiger on October 02, 2016, 04:43:39 AM
What's the alternative? A women who is willing to kill the same type soldiers that protect her all for political and financial gain?

Or killing anyone who stands in her way?
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: dallaswareagle on October 03, 2016, 12:04:44 PM
Or killing anyone ?


I don't think standing in her way really matters.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: dallaswareagle on October 03, 2016, 12:53:56 PM
Or killing anyone who stands in her way?


(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u1/miked0003/14523162_550379821834724_3313903043749045882_n1_zpspmdqbfgw.jpg) (http://s164.photobucket.com/user/miked0003/media/14523162_550379821834724_3313903043749045882_n1_zpspmdqbfgw.jpg.html)
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: djsimp on October 03, 2016, 01:21:18 PM

(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u1/miked0003/14523162_550379821834724_3313903043749045882_n1_zpspmdqbfgw.jpg) (http://s164.photobucket.com/user/miked0003/media/14523162_550379821834724_3313903043749045882_n1_zpspmdqbfgw.jpg.html)

I LOL'd.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on October 09, 2016, 11:55:32 PM
Round Two was better for Trump.

It's still like watching Alabama play, though.  No matter who they're playing you know you've got to battle them, their cheating machine and the refs all game long. 

Same with Bitchlary. They're in the bag for her so hard it's disgusting.

I've been a little surprised at how hateful Megyn Kelley has been toward Trump tonight.  She's coming across like a major bitch.  Other than that, she's hot, especially when her hair is down.  She could use some plumping up in the tits, but I'd break her down like a shotgun, hammer that kitty until smoke boils off it and then paint her face with glory. 

Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on October 10, 2016, 12:38:07 AM
Round Two was better for Trump.

It's still like watching Alabama play, though.  No matter who they're playing you know you've got to battle them, their cheating machine and the refs all game long. 

Same with Bitchlary. They're in the bag for her so hard it's disgusting.

I've been a little surprised at how hateful Megyn Kelley has been toward Trump tonight.  She's coming across like a major bitch.  Other than that, she's hot, especially when her hair is down.  She could use some plumping up in the tits, but I'd break her down like a shotgun, hammer that kitty until smoke boils off it and then paint her face with glory.

Damn there goes your bid for the Whitehouse! You know as soon as you announce, prowler is selling this shit to CNN!

I'm sure he'll be around short!y with the cocaine accusations again.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on October 10, 2016, 03:19:03 AM
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/14517422_10101044388878390_3675658092663246881_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=e06a195923bd8fb77c63bf7696fd07ec&oe=5865A4CB)
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on October 10, 2016, 08:37:21 AM
What? No cocaine to go with the strange...
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on October 10, 2016, 08:59:43 AM
How worried are the liberal media hacks that Trump overcame the ridiculous furor over some offhand braggadocio? 

FOURTEEN negative stories about the man on the front page of USAToday this morning. 

Fourteen. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on October 10, 2016, 09:40:59 AM
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14650484_922591814541249_5782937310504314898_n.jpg?oh=c194544065324ead47299b95594b91e5&oe=58A4F784)
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: GH2001 on October 10, 2016, 01:32:48 PM
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/14517422_10101044388878390_3675658092663246881_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=e06a195923bd8fb77c63bf7696fd07ec&oe=5865A4CB)

You'd rather grab a dick?
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on October 10, 2016, 01:39:51 PM
You'd rather grab a dick?

We've already established much of that...
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on October 10, 2016, 05:56:42 PM
What? No cocaine to go with the strange...
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/14563584_10210463967371551_4892251094681559572_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=d8d6daff805e39d81832418affadd136&oe=58727EA2)
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: oldautiger on October 10, 2016, 08:20:29 PM
My take on all this
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on October 11, 2016, 08:26:57 AM
https://youtu.be/2NPPE6a7mSI

The video cut out before hearing her final statement...

"...they're a pair two in one and roll damn tide!!!!!"
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on October 11, 2016, 09:34:52 AM
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p370x247/14657391_565077237021613_9104924190336676891_n.jpg?oh=27fcf79192b7f0238863d464a7a2617f&oe=58A551A4)
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Token on October 11, 2016, 09:44:09 AM
https://youtu.be/2NPPE6a7mSI

The video cut out before hearing her final statement...

"...they're a pair two in one and roll damn tide!!!!!"

The best part of that video and the entire argument that "little kids heard that tape. Little boys and little girls heard what he said about women...." is how they heard it.  You can't play the shit on a loop for 48 hours on every station you own and then act like someone else is to blame because a bunch of little kids heard vulgar talk.  I get that they wanted to play it to destroy Trump because they felt like everyone needed to know that's how he talked in private, but don't act like ANYONE else is to blame if little Johnny heard the entire thing watching the goddamn news channel when they played it over and over.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: Kaos on October 11, 2016, 10:00:24 AM
https://youtu.be/2NPPE6a7mSI

The video cut out before hearing her final statement...

"...they're a pair two in one and roll damn tide!!!!!"

FUCK the Clinton News Network. 

And while you're at it, fuck all of these too:

All Bout Clinton network
Nothing But Clinton network
Clinton Broadcasting Service
Mainly Servicing Nothing But Clinton network
and so the fuck on. 

Also?  Fuck Paul Ryan.  I hope he gets tossed out of office on his self-righteous ass.  Worthless piece of shit. 
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: oldautiger on October 11, 2016, 01:41:52 PM
FUCK the Clinton News Network. 

And while you're at it, fuck all of these too:

All Bout Clinton network
Nothing But Clinton network
Clinton Broadcasting Service
Mainly Servicing Nothing But Clinton network
and so the fuck on. 

Also?  Fuck Paul Ryan.  I hope he gets tossed out of office on his self-righteous ass.  Worthless piece of shit.

Don't forget fucking George Sorryass Soros the ultimate mother fucker
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on October 11, 2016, 01:55:04 PM
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14650484_922591814541249_5782937310504314898_n.jpg?oh=c194544065324ead47299b95594b91e5&oe=58A4F784)

As a follow up:

(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/14502892_1175522595847758_1929083176193970547_n.jpg?oh=8e5a303ee51e980a10a3910cbd9c618c&oe=58A64BB5)
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: AUChizad on October 11, 2016, 02:41:54 PM
Alex Jones has a perfectly rational, reasonable explanation for the fly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMV_W_9PTLY
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on October 11, 2016, 03:05:14 PM
Alex Jones has a perfectly rational, reasonable explanation for the fly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMV_W_9PTLY
I have a feeling that he's going to suicide himself, twice in the back of the head. Hillary doesn't like people talking bad about her.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: GH2001 on October 11, 2016, 03:35:26 PM
Alex Jones has a perfectly rational, reasonable explanation for the fly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMV_W_9PTLY

He's so credible. Like he was on jade helm.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: AUChizad on October 11, 2016, 05:27:49 PM
Alex Jones has a perfectly rational, reasonable explanation for the fly.

Related.

https://youtu.be/edwCVThqqXQ
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on October 11, 2016, 06:20:21 PM
LAUGHING MY ASS OFF...

http://youtu.be/2PqD-MeItDI
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on October 11, 2016, 06:20:48 PM
Related.

https://youtu.be/edwCVThqqXQ
AAAAHHHAHAHA!!!!!
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on October 17, 2016, 06:36:10 PM
What? No cocaine to go with the strange...
http://addictinginfo.org/2016/10/17/the-white-house-just-mocked-trumps-drug-test-request-says-hes-the-one-on-drugs-video/
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: CCTAU on October 17, 2016, 10:14:48 PM
http://addictinginfo.org/2016/10/17/the-white-house-just-mocked-trumps-drug-test-request-says-hes-the-one-on-drugs-video/ (http://addictinginfo.org/2016/10/17/the-white-house-just-mocked-trumps-drug-test-request-says-hes-the-one-on-drugs-video/)


It's just a little cup of piss!


Might just show those anti seizure drugs hitlary is on. If you Libtards really believe he's snorting, you should stand up and applaud the test.
But it's not about truth.
Title: Re: The Debate
Post by: The Prowler on October 18, 2016, 11:08:15 PM

It's just a little cup of piss!


Might just show those anti seizure drugs hitlary is on. If you Libtards really believe he's snorting, you should stand up and applaud the test.
But it's not about truth.
I want them to be tested, if either candidate fails for having illegal drugs in their system, they are done. I want the tests to be done by a third party, unaffiliated with either side and I want them to have their blood taken on stage, in front of everyone...and a hair sample (not from the dead animal on top of Trump's head).
If I have to go through that entire process just to get a 8 hour, low paying job...then they should have to go through it to become the President. Btw, Cannabis is fine...should've never been illegal in the first damn place.

I want them to say that they aren't going to be doing any sort of drug testing on the candidates, then surprise them on stage, during the debate, with two syringes per candidate and a pair of scissors. That way they can't back out of the debate or anything of that nature.