So, a non-enforceable commitment (the athlete's) was broken because the $$ (UF offer) didn't manifest?
Not seeing any contractual claims here. Kid ended up with a DI scholly (unless he's going to make the really fun argument that a UF football scholly is worth that much more than a Pac 10/12...in some sort of detrimental reliance argument which would be really fun for CFB fans).
I don't see much merit in it either; however, I'm looking at it more from the standpoint of Florida potentially having an out on Napier. Even if the suit fails, if they "investigate" and find Napier was involved, they can cut the chord, which I don't think they'd get much push back for from the fans.