11
The SGA / Re: What would it take?
« Last post by chinook on May 21, 2024, 06:29:24 PM »"Unified Reich"?
check your facts on the context and don't confuse unified with third.
regardless it's cringe worthy.
"Unified Reich"?
Honestly, it's just lawyering 101: throw up a claim, make the defense do a calculus on defense v settlement; first to capitulate loses (except the lawyers).
But do we elect Barack for the fourth term?
Kind of the same thing with Pruitt at UT. Before the last Benjamins and stray fries had been pulled out of the McDonald's bags, the Vols were running him for cause. I'm sure they worked out a little sump'n sump'n with JP.
I agree that the choice is uninspiring, but this is some dire shit coming from the presumptive R candidate.
We need better choices than these two. Biden can’t cobble together a coherent sentence without being hopped up on something and Trump cobbles together insanity.
This election is a nightmare.
Oh, sure. There's some mud that they can throw on his contract now and force a mediated settlement.
I don't see much merit in it either; however, I'm looking at it more from the standpoint of Florida potentially having an out on Napier. Even if the suit fails, if they "investigate" and find Napier was involved, they can cut the chord, which I don't think they'd get much push back for from the fans.