Goddammit, you assholes are forcing me to take a position on this I wouldn't normally with your ridiculous double standards.
What
double standards? Are you kidding me???
GarMan, do you think these statements apply to this case? Why or why not? (Hint: I probably will agree). Then remind me again, why it does apply to Martin/Zimmerman.
These statements apply no more and no less to this case. In this case, we have two thugs looking for trouble, eventually attacking and car-jacking a victim. Trayvon was walking in the rain acting suspicious, according to Zimmerman, within a gated community, and if you take Zimmerman at his word during the 911 call, Trayvon approached him in his vehicle with his hand in his waistband, which usually suggests that he's packing a firearm or other weapon. Just stating the obvious for you... And, race has nothing to do with this case either.
Does race still have nothing to do with it? Or it does, but only when it's black guys attacking white guys?
Or, only when it's white guys attacking black guys, of course?
And you guys will be waiting for all of the evidence to come out before passing judgement on these kids, right?
I mean, , right?
Right...
Have we been able to confirm what the victim was wearing? Let's dig up whatever we can find about this guy to see if he deserved what he got. I heard he skipped class once in 1978. If true, he obviously deserved what was coming to him, right?
Nobody said that Trayvon
deserved it because he'd been fucking off over the past year. Trayvon didn't
deserve anything, but when he chose to act like a thug with a Neighborhood Watch volunteer, he found the trouble that his apparent behavior instigated.