One difference between him and, say, Anne Coulter, was that for example in that Bashir interview, where the interviewer clearly had an agenda, when he showed him the Obama monkey picture (that had nothing to do with him) or mentioned that guy that wrote a piece for Breitbart's website, he didn't defend it, he said it was deplorable. He didn't snidely go "Oh, what's the big deal, get over it." He condemned it and exposed the fallacious tactic Bashir was using. I like that he didn't defend everything the right did, just to defend it. He called it like he saw it. To me, it made his arguments stronger when he wasn't crying wolf all the time.