Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

To Poll Or Not To Poll

Snaggletiger

  • *
  • 44113
  • My Fighting Pearls
To Poll Or Not To Poll
« on: November 28, 2016, 10:21:09 AM »
Seeing some discussion in other threads about the need for expanded playoffs and/or the ranking system.  Personally, I've advocated for an 8 team playoff from the start and I can see it eventually going to that.  I also felt there was zero need for the selection committee and we would have been better served keeping the BCS ranking system in place to choose the current 4 teams, and ultimately the 8 teams.

My question though, is how much do we really need to try and alter the current state of college football when it comes to ranking the teams and deciding who is in and who goes to the Poulan Weedeater Krispy Kreme Bowl?  College football is totally unique in its set up.  No other sport from Junior High throughout all areas of professional sports handles their rankings and ultimate decision making on who plays on like college football.  I grew up in a time when polls were the only thing that mattered.  Where you landed in the AP or UPI or Coaches' polls was just the way it was.  Everything was decided by the "Eye test" of the voters, which left the entire system open to discussion, argument and heated debate.  Seemingly deserving programs getting the shaft and other programs claiming multiple championships based on whatever poll suited their fancy at the time.

There were no automatic bids (Other than the Rose Bowl) to certain bowls.  It came down to the committee for each particular bowl game to decide who they wanted and extend offers to those teams. Certainly, things have changed with regard to bowls and our ranking system, but at the end of the day, our current playoff system is still decided by the eye test.  The committee will meet tomorrow night behind closed doors, hash out where they think everyone should land and give us their findings.  And the college football world, from fans to "experts" and analysts will debate the merits of those results.

Back to my question. While I firmly believe there's a better way, is it something we really want to mess with?  Aren't those very discussions and debates part of what sets college football apart from all other sports at every level?  At the end of the day, shouldn't the "Eye test" always factor in, at least to some degree? 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
My doctor told me I needed to stop masturbating.  I asked him why, and he said, "because I'm trying to examine you."

Kaos

  • *
  • 29191
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: To Poll Or Not To Poll
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2016, 10:37:47 AM »
Yes.  I want to mess with it.  It needs to be tossed on the garbage bin of time and become a memory. 

What happens on the field is the only thing that should matter. 

Take the WINNERS of the following conferences:

SEC
Pac12
BigTen
Big 12
ACC

The conference decides whether there is a championship game or not, either way it doesn't matter.  Whoever and however the conference decides. That's five.

Then take three at-large teams from the CHAMPIONS of the
CUSA
Mountain West
MAC
Sunbelt
American

and/or one of the

Independents

Use the BCS rankings system (or the polls, whatever) to figure out which teams to include.

That's a total of eight teams.  You don't win your conference?  You're OUT.   So long Michigan and Ohio State. 

Eight teams.  Six total games.

Peach, Fiesta, Rose, Sugar, Orange, Cotton rotate them out. 

That's the way it should be. 

The only other viable option to me is to cut the season down to eight or ten games and then start the playoff process by including four teams from each conference in the mix.   The teams that don't make it play out the string against other losers for no reason. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

The Six

  • ***
  • 4332
  • Leaning on a broken fence b/t past & present tense
    • My Linktree
Re: To Poll Or Not To Poll
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2016, 11:12:19 AM »
4 Conferences: 64 Teams: 16 teams each: North, South (SEC Southern ACC), West (PAC 12, Big 12), Central (Big 10, Northern coast of ACC)
11 conference games
1 out of conference game against another team from one of the four big conferences
No conference championship game (conference champion based on conference record on the field)

Playoffs consist of 4 conference champion teams, 4 wild cards coming from remaining 4 conferences with no more than 2 slots taken by any one conference (so the ACC can't have 3 teams in and such).

It will NEVER happen even though it should.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"I'm sick of following my dreams...I'm just going to ask them where they are going and hook up with 'em later." - Mitch Hedberg

Kaos

  • *
  • 29191
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: To Poll Or Not To Poll
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2016, 11:33:10 AM »
4 Conferences: 64 Teams: 16 teams each: North, South (SEC Southern ACC), West (PAC 12, Big 12), Central (Big 10, Northern coast of ACC)
11 conference games
1 out of conference game against another team from one of the four big conferences
No conference championship game (conference champion based on conference record on the field)

Playoffs consist of 4 conference champion teams, 4 wild cards coming from remaining 4 conferences with no more than 2 slots taken by any one conference (so the ACC can't have 3 teams in and such).

It will NEVER happen even though it should.

No.  Too much subjectivity. 

My way is better.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

Buzz Killington

  • *
  • 22872
  • Bofa
Re: To Poll Or Not To Poll
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2016, 11:49:24 AM »
Why not let the BCS formula choose the final 4 for a playoff?
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Now I may be an idiot, but there is one thing I am not, sir, and that, sir, is an idiot.

Snaggletiger

  • *
  • 44113
  • My Fighting Pearls
Re: To Poll Or Not To Poll
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2016, 11:51:23 AM »
Why not let the BCS formula choose the final 4 for a playoff?

Damn fine suggestion.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
My doctor told me I needed to stop masturbating.  I asked him why, and he said, "because I'm trying to examine you."

GH2001

  • *
  • 23705
  • I'm a Miller guy. Always been. Since I was like, 8
Re: To Poll Or Not To Poll
« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2016, 11:52:01 AM »
Why not let the BCS formula choose the final 4 for a playoff?

Computers don't have political and money motives. Can't be having that kind of objectivity!
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
WDE

jmar

  • ****
  • 10350
Re: To Poll Or Not To Poll
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2016, 12:11:09 PM »
Bamer git an automatic bid. Rest of em fight it out. Ro Ti!
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

The Six

  • ***
  • 4332
  • Leaning on a broken fence b/t past & present tense
    • My Linktree
Re: To Poll Or Not To Poll
« Reply #8 on: November 28, 2016, 12:59:26 PM »
No.  Too much subjectivity. 

My way is better.

How is on the field performance subjective?
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"I'm sick of following my dreams...I'm just going to ask them where they are going and hook up with 'em later." - Mitch Hedberg

Kaos

  • *
  • 29191
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: To Poll Or Not To Poll
« Reply #9 on: November 28, 2016, 01:24:39 PM »
How is on the field performance subjective?

My plan is 100% on field.  Yours has this:

4 wild cards coming from remaining 4 conferences with no more than 2 slots taken by any one conference (so the ACC can't have 3 teams in and such).

Half the field is determined by some board or something picking the wildcard teams I assume.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

GH2001

  • *
  • 23705
  • I'm a Miller guy. Always been. Since I was like, 8
Re: To Poll Or Not To Poll
« Reply #10 on: November 28, 2016, 01:49:02 PM »
How is on the field performance subjective?

Think he's saying the wild cards are subjective. Since they are chosen and not winners of conferences.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
WDE

The Six

  • ***
  • 4332
  • Leaning on a broken fence b/t past & present tense
    • My Linktree
Re: To Poll Or Not To Poll
« Reply #11 on: November 28, 2016, 01:55:15 PM »
My plan is 100% on field.  Yours has this:

4 wild cards coming from remaining 4 conferences with no more than 2 slots taken by any one conference (so the ACC can't have 3 teams in and such).

Half the field is determined by some board or something picking the wildcard teams I assume.

I should have clarified that, yes. Wild cards would be runners up based on record and compared to each other.
Say your Big Four finish 11-0, 10-1. 10-1, and 11-0. That's your top 4. If the runners up to the two 11-0 teams are both 10-1, they go. But say the runner up to one of the 10-1 teams is 8-3 or 7-4 and the other 10-1 runners up are 9-2 and 9-2. The two 9-2 teams would go over the 8 or 7 win teams based on overall record.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"I'm sick of following my dreams...I'm just going to ask them where they are going and hook up with 'em later." - Mitch Hedberg

Kaos

  • *
  • 29191
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: To Poll Or Not To Poll
« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2016, 02:21:01 PM »
I should have clarified that, yes. Wild cards would be runners up based on record and compared to each other.
Say your Big Four finish 11-0, 10-1. 10-1, and 11-0. That's your top 4. If the runners up to the two 11-0 teams are both 10-1, they go. But say the runner up to one of the 10-1 teams is 8-3 or 7-4 and the other 10-1 runners up are 9-2 and 9-2. The two 9-2 teams would go over the 8 or 7 win teams based on overall record.

Strangth of SHADULE, Pawwwwwwl..  How he gonna adderess that? huh?
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.