21
Haley Center Basement / Re: Explore Practical Guides and Tips on wikirecording.org
« Last post by Kaos on August 12, 2025, 09:49:12 AM »Your mother is a hoor. Her resources are handy.
Recent Posts
22
Haley Center Basement / Explore Practical Guides and Tips on wikirecording.org
« Last post by _WonesTuin_ on August 12, 2025, 05:16:20 AM »Looking for clear, well-written articles that explain everyday communication and document-sharing challenges? wikirecording.org is packed with practical guides on topics like free online faxing, sending large files, verifying email delivery, and understanding why fax still matters in some professions. Each article is written in a friendly, easy-to-follow style, so you can quickly grasp the essentials and apply them right away. Whether you’re a business owner, freelancer, or just curious about efficient communication methods, this site is a handy resource that makes complex topics simple.
23
Haley Center Basement / Re: Avoid Data Risks with Structured File Management
« Last post by Kaos on August 11, 2025, 04:40:03 PM »Take that paper. Wad it up into a ball, real tight. Then pour some canola on it and shove it up your candy ass.
24
Haley Center Basement / Avoid Data Risks with Structured File Management
« Last post by _WonesTuin_ on August 10, 2025, 11:51:44 PM »When files are stored on a shared network without proper controls, your organization is exposed to unnecessary risks. At ejoi2018.org, the focus is on strategies to prevent leaks and accidental modifications. A consistent file naming standard helps your team find critical documents quickly, reducing downtime and frustration. Tracking file access is equally important—it ensures you know exactly who viewed or edited data, which strengthens accountability. By combining secure storage, naming discipline, and access monitoring, you create an environment where collaboration thrives without compromising safety. Protect your business data and keep your team organized by applying proven file management techniques today.
25
Haley Center Basement / Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Last post by Kaos on August 10, 2025, 10:14:30 AM »Weapons
In Theaters
Intended to go see Naked Gun, but got there a little late and picked Weapons instead. Glad we did.
Didn’t know much about the film but love horror so why not? Have to admit when I saw Julia Garner’s ugly fro pop up on the screen I groaned inwardly. She has sucked the life out of every role she’s taken since she twanged it up as Ruth in Ozark.
In a surprise, she wasn’t completely terrible here. Plus there was enough going on around her that she couldn’t completely sink the film on her own. Oh, she’s still bad. The worst part of this movie. But she wasn’t given space to ruin it.
The theater was completely full for the 7:30 showing, which is encouraging to someone who loves movies and wants the theater experience to survive. If there was an empty seat after the last stragglers wandered in disrupting the first ten minutes of the film I’d be surprised.
The movie we chose was Weapons. It was a much better film than I hoped given my trepidation when I saw Julia Garner as a lead.
In addition to Ruth from Ozark, the movie also features Josh Brolin who played Thanos in the Avengers movies and Amy Madigan, who is married to Ed Harris for 40 years and been in many films/shows.
Plot wise, all I’m willing to give is that 2:17 am one morning every student in Ozark Ruth’s elementary school class got out of bed, walked out the front door, and disappeared. Every student except one, that is. Where they went is anybody’s guess.
The movie followed an unusual narrative path, similar to how Tarrantino movies are often “out of order.” But the filmmakers did a very good job of slowly piecing it all together. Had it just played chronologically from a single point of view it would not have been as compelling.
The movie did a great job of interspersing humor with the horror. That’s a positive selling point for this type of horror film. I wasn’t always sure if the director intended for the audience to laugh at some of the scenes, but that was the reaction that was generated.
Kaos says go see it.
In Theaters
Intended to go see Naked Gun, but got there a little late and picked Weapons instead. Glad we did.
Didn’t know much about the film but love horror so why not? Have to admit when I saw Julia Garner’s ugly fro pop up on the screen I groaned inwardly. She has sucked the life out of every role she’s taken since she twanged it up as Ruth in Ozark.
In a surprise, she wasn’t completely terrible here. Plus there was enough going on around her that she couldn’t completely sink the film on her own. Oh, she’s still bad. The worst part of this movie. But she wasn’t given space to ruin it.
The theater was completely full for the 7:30 showing, which is encouraging to someone who loves movies and wants the theater experience to survive. If there was an empty seat after the last stragglers wandered in disrupting the first ten minutes of the film I’d be surprised.
The movie we chose was Weapons. It was a much better film than I hoped given my trepidation when I saw Julia Garner as a lead.
In addition to Ruth from Ozark, the movie also features Josh Brolin who played Thanos in the Avengers movies and Amy Madigan, who is married to Ed Harris for 40 years and been in many films/shows.
Plot wise, all I’m willing to give is that 2:17 am one morning every student in Ozark Ruth’s elementary school class got out of bed, walked out the front door, and disappeared. Every student except one, that is. Where they went is anybody’s guess.
The movie followed an unusual narrative path, similar to how Tarrantino movies are often “out of order.” But the filmmakers did a very good job of slowly piecing it all together. Had it just played chronologically from a single point of view it would not have been as compelling.
The movie did a great job of interspersing humor with the horror. That’s a positive selling point for this type of horror film. I wasn’t always sure if the director intended for the audience to laugh at some of the scenes, but that was the reaction that was generated.
Kaos says go see it.
26
Haley Center Basement / Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Last post by Kaos on August 03, 2025, 09:52:44 AM »In a Violent Nature
I remember being kind of excited about watching this film. It's supposedly the first slasher movie told from the point of view of the killer.
Then it crashed and burned at the box office and disappeared from sight. When it popped up on one of the streaming services last week, I figured I'd give it a shot.
I understand why it flopped.
The movie follows (very literally) a Jason Voorhees-esqe masked slasher with mommy issues as he trudges through the woods and takes out a few random randy teens. When I say follows, I mean it follows - as in 90% of the camera shots are from behind the killer's shoulder as he morosely tromps, and tromps, and tromps, and tromps, and tromps, and tromps through the woods, one crunching footstep after another.
I looked at my watch after 15 minutes of this guy stomping and wheezing, occasionally stopping to take a lurking look at something, wondering when the actual film was going to start. By "killer's perspective" I was hoping to see a movie like the one I have written in my head, but won't share here in case I ever do figure out how to sell the concept. I didn't want to watch literal hours of this guy just walking along, hearing his tread break pine straw on the forest floor.
That's what this is.
Yes, there are two creative kills - one is bizarrely gruesome - but even if they were the most creative and gruesome of all time, they wouldn't make up for the constant plodding along that makes up the majority of this film.
I hear it's divisive. You either love it or hate it. Put me in the hate category.
I remember being kind of excited about watching this film. It's supposedly the first slasher movie told from the point of view of the killer.
Then it crashed and burned at the box office and disappeared from sight. When it popped up on one of the streaming services last week, I figured I'd give it a shot.
I understand why it flopped.
The movie follows (very literally) a Jason Voorhees-esqe masked slasher with mommy issues as he trudges through the woods and takes out a few random randy teens. When I say follows, I mean it follows - as in 90% of the camera shots are from behind the killer's shoulder as he morosely tromps, and tromps, and tromps, and tromps, and tromps, and tromps through the woods, one crunching footstep after another.
I looked at my watch after 15 minutes of this guy stomping and wheezing, occasionally stopping to take a lurking look at something, wondering when the actual film was going to start. By "killer's perspective" I was hoping to see a movie like the one I have written in my head, but won't share here in case I ever do figure out how to sell the concept. I didn't want to watch literal hours of this guy just walking along, hearing his tread break pine straw on the forest floor.
That's what this is.
Yes, there are two creative kills - one is bizarrely gruesome - but even if they were the most creative and gruesome of all time, they wouldn't make up for the constant plodding along that makes up the majority of this film.
I hear it's divisive. You either love it or hate it. Put me in the hate category.
27
Haley Center Basement / Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Last post by Kaos on August 03, 2025, 09:39:07 AM »Final Destination: Bloodlines
Max
I’m a fan of the FD series overall. Final Destination 1 was clever and different (hello Ali Larter). 2 expanded the concept and took it a step further in a good way (hello AJ Cook). It lost the beam a little in the sub-par 3 and 4 (one filmed right here in Mobile) but returned to form in 5, a stellar full-circle that resurrected the series and sent it out on a high note.
Until….
It’s been 14 years since 5 provided the perfect bookend to 1 and closed the loop. When I heard another FD was in the works I rolled my eyes at what I assumed was just a cash grab retread. Didn’t go see it in theaters. Only caught it last night due to some insomnia. I was wrong. It’s true to the spirit of the franchise and is as good an entry as any, save the OG.
Creatively gory kills? Yep. Preposterous - but maybe it could happen - chain of events? Absolutely. Red herrings and fake outs that pay off in unexpected ways? You bet. Humor? Tension? Gleeful carnage? You betcha.
The best part to me was the loving and bittersweet send off the film gave Tony Todd (Candyman). He’s was a peripheral player in all five previous installments. Here he was deathly ill (obviously, he weighed about 90 lbs) and the movie not only gave him a backstory, but it allowed him to ad-lib an in-character message to his fans (and I’m one). If that scene doesn’t kick you in the feels? You’re a monster.
So yes. If you like the premise of the Final Destination movies, this is definitely worth your time.
Max
I’m a fan of the FD series overall. Final Destination 1 was clever and different (hello Ali Larter). 2 expanded the concept and took it a step further in a good way (hello AJ Cook). It lost the beam a little in the sub-par 3 and 4 (one filmed right here in Mobile) but returned to form in 5, a stellar full-circle that resurrected the series and sent it out on a high note.
Until….
It’s been 14 years since 5 provided the perfect bookend to 1 and closed the loop. When I heard another FD was in the works I rolled my eyes at what I assumed was just a cash grab retread. Didn’t go see it in theaters. Only caught it last night due to some insomnia. I was wrong. It’s true to the spirit of the franchise and is as good an entry as any, save the OG.
Creatively gory kills? Yep. Preposterous - but maybe it could happen - chain of events? Absolutely. Red herrings and fake outs that pay off in unexpected ways? You bet. Humor? Tension? Gleeful carnage? You betcha.
The best part to me was the loving and bittersweet send off the film gave Tony Todd (Candyman). He’s was a peripheral player in all five previous installments. Here he was deathly ill (obviously, he weighed about 90 lbs) and the movie not only gave him a backstory, but it allowed him to ad-lib an in-character message to his fans (and I’m one). If that scene doesn’t kick you in the feels? You’re a monster.
So yes. If you like the premise of the Final Destination movies, this is definitely worth your time.
28
Haley Center Basement / Re: Всеобъемлющая дезинфекция объектов: ключевой элемент санитарного порядка
« Last post by Kaos on August 02, 2025, 03:44:26 PM »Thanks Hillary.
29
Haley Center Basement / Всеобъемлющая дезинфекция объектов: ключевой элемент санитарного порядка
« Last post by samdezKix on August 02, 2025, 03:00:06 AM »Комплекс мер по обеспечению гигиены: основа гигиенической стабильности
Мероприятия по дезинсекции, дератизации и дезинфекции в нынешних реалиях становятся важной составляющей эпидемиологической профилактики в домах, квартирах и организациях. Проведение санитарных работ ориентированы на ликвидацию вредителей и возбудителей болезней. Применение современных методик обеспечивает санитарную чистоту с минимальным риском заражения.
Защита жилья от вредителей и болезней
В жилых помещениях, независимо от того, квартира это, городская квартира или деревенская изба, санитарные меры по борьбе с вредителями обеспечивают ликвидацию опасных организмов. Это критически необходимо в периоды активизации вредителей. Обработка участков и придомовых территорий помогает повторное проникновение паразитов. С использованием передовых методик, все процедуры проводятся безопасно для человека, домашних животных и окружающей среды.
Обработка офисов, ЖК и административных зданий
Административные управляющие прибегают к услугам по санитарному контролю на объектах. Периодическое обслуживание по поддержанию гигиены на общедомовых пространствах предотвращают возможность заражения. Офисы, банки, бизнес-центры и госучреждения тоже обращаются за дезинфекцией и дезинсекцией. Обязательные и дополнительные мероприятия предотвращают заражения сотрудников и посетителей. Профилактика и дезинфекция не только обезопасят среду для здоровья, но и укрепляют репутацию компании.
Общественное питание и детские учреждения под особым контролем
Заведения с приготовлением еды требуют гигиенической ответственности. В данных заведениях санитарная обработка должна осуществляться систематически в соответствии с требованиями Роспотребнадзора. Контроль кухни, зала и склада удаляет источники болезней. Профессиональная обработка устраняет источники заражений и обеспечивает гигиену. Заведения, где находятся дети обязаны соблюдать максимальные меры безопасности. Любое отклонение опасно для здоровья воспитанников. Дезинфекция школ и садов должна осуществляться только профессионалами.
https://www.ntsr.info/forum/user/123544/
https://alliancetrade.ru/forum/index.php?PAGE_NAME=profile_view&UID=2709
https://tokaido-nsk.com/forum/index.php?PAGE_NAME=profile_view&UID=18937
https://tajfood.tj/forum/index.php?PAGE_NAME=profile_view&UID=2680
https://tokaido-nsk.com/forum/index.php?PAGE_NAME=profile_view&UID=18935
Мероприятия по дезинсекции, дератизации и дезинфекции в нынешних реалиях становятся важной составляющей эпидемиологической профилактики в домах, квартирах и организациях. Проведение санитарных работ ориентированы на ликвидацию вредителей и возбудителей болезней. Применение современных методик обеспечивает санитарную чистоту с минимальным риском заражения.
Защита жилья от вредителей и болезней
В жилых помещениях, независимо от того, квартира это, городская квартира или деревенская изба, санитарные меры по борьбе с вредителями обеспечивают ликвидацию опасных организмов. Это критически необходимо в периоды активизации вредителей. Обработка участков и придомовых территорий помогает повторное проникновение паразитов. С использованием передовых методик, все процедуры проводятся безопасно для человека, домашних животных и окружающей среды.
Обработка офисов, ЖК и административных зданий
Административные управляющие прибегают к услугам по санитарному контролю на объектах. Периодическое обслуживание по поддержанию гигиены на общедомовых пространствах предотвращают возможность заражения. Офисы, банки, бизнес-центры и госучреждения тоже обращаются за дезинфекцией и дезинсекцией. Обязательные и дополнительные мероприятия предотвращают заражения сотрудников и посетителей. Профилактика и дезинфекция не только обезопасят среду для здоровья, но и укрепляют репутацию компании.
Общественное питание и детские учреждения под особым контролем
Заведения с приготовлением еды требуют гигиенической ответственности. В данных заведениях санитарная обработка должна осуществляться систематически в соответствии с требованиями Роспотребнадзора. Контроль кухни, зала и склада удаляет источники болезней. Профессиональная обработка устраняет источники заражений и обеспечивает гигиену. Заведения, где находятся дети обязаны соблюдать максимальные меры безопасности. Любое отклонение опасно для здоровья воспитанников. Дезинфекция школ и садов должна осуществляться только профессионалами.
https://www.ntsr.info/forum/user/123544/
https://alliancetrade.ru/forum/index.php?PAGE_NAME=profile_view&UID=2709
https://tokaido-nsk.com/forum/index.php?PAGE_NAME=profile_view&UID=18937
https://tajfood.tj/forum/index.php?PAGE_NAME=profile_view&UID=2680
https://tokaido-nsk.com/forum/index.php?PAGE_NAME=profile_view&UID=18935
30
Haley Center Basement / Re: Kaos' way behind movie reviews
« Last post by Kaos on August 01, 2025, 09:09:36 PM »Deep Cover
Orlando Bloom, Opie’s daughter, and a mild mannered Indian are struggling improv comedians/actors recruited by a detective (Sean Bean) to help him do some minor undercover work - essentially purchasing black market cigarettes. Due to their own inability to stop improvising as the scene unfolds they get pulled into a deeper undercover project that infiltrates the London mob.
It’s never laugh out loud funny, but it moves at an entertaining clip. The performances are at the edge of over the top, but they fit this fluffy action romp.
Opies girl is pretty good. Bloom is way better than I expected. The Indian nerd has some funny moments.
It’s cute. That’s the best description I can come up with.
It deserves better treatment than disappearing into streaming oblivion. It’s a decent movie that I enjoyed watching.
Orlando Bloom, Opie’s daughter, and a mild mannered Indian are struggling improv comedians/actors recruited by a detective (Sean Bean) to help him do some minor undercover work - essentially purchasing black market cigarettes. Due to their own inability to stop improvising as the scene unfolds they get pulled into a deeper undercover project that infiltrates the London mob.
It’s never laugh out loud funny, but it moves at an entertaining clip. The performances are at the edge of over the top, but they fit this fluffy action romp.
Opies girl is pretty good. Bloom is way better than I expected. The Indian nerd has some funny moments.
It’s cute. That’s the best description I can come up with.
It deserves better treatment than disappearing into streaming oblivion. It’s a decent movie that I enjoyed watching.