Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports
The Library => The SGA => Topic started by: AUownsU on April 17, 2016, 09:22:01 PM
-
Grounds for treason imo. Should be hung.
http://nypost.com/2016/04/17/how-us-covered-up-saudi-role-in-911/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=site+buttons&utm_campaign=site+buttons
-
He did more than that. The entire Bush administration worked to cover for that failure. Slick Willie is involved too. Hopefully, we can shine sunlight and find out all of the details. The Saudi threats are laughable as the Zionist will influence the next president to take their shit.
-
Grounds for treason imo. Should be hung.
http://nypost.com/2016/04/17/how-us-covered-up-saudi-role-in-911/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=site+buttons&utm_campaign=site+buttons
(https://memecrunch.com/meme/3TVMY/this-is-horseshit/image.png?w=400&c=1)
-
(https://memecrunch.com/meme/3TVMY/this-is-horseshit/image.png?w=400&c=1)
You think the ny post isn't credible? Real question.
-
(https://memecrunch.com/meme/3TVMY/this-is-horseshit/image.png?w=400&c=1)
Faux News amirite.
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/04/17/lt-col-ralph-peters-saudi-arabia-potential-involvement-911-report-influence-us
-
You think the ny post isn't credible? Real question.
Real answer?
Year 8 of demonizing Bush. Liberal media -- yes, this rag and 60 minutes -- spent the last eight years throwing shade on Bush. This is an extension of that.
We have a Muslim terror sympathizing euro socialist in the White House. A true danger to this nation and its way of life. Yet everything is Bush's fault.
I don't know the particulars of what he did or didn't do. I don't know what maintaining at least one ally in that desert hellhole required him to do. We definitely had no friends in Libya, Iraq, Iran, Afghsnistan, Pakistan.... Maybe not destroying our relationship with the Saudi government over the actions of a few rogue assholes was a necessary evil.
The world isn't black and white. Obama and Clinton are far more evil and destructive than Bush could ever be.
-
So much for Newt's Contract With America. Accountable to no one, our political system has reached far beyond what our founders envisioned. I, for one, harbor continuous anger in response to the actions of both parties.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Contract+with+America
-
I don't know the particulars of what he did or didn't do. I don't know what maintaining at least one ally in that desert hellhole required him to do. We definitely had no friends in Libya, Iraq, Iran, Afghsnistan, Pakistan.... Maybe not destroying our relationship with the Saudi government over the actions of a few rogue assholes was a necessary evil.
Our covert funds had been slashed to nil. We needed some sort of ally for information on the ground. And unfortunately, they were it.
-
Our covert funds had been slashed to nil. We needed some sort of ally for information on the ground. And unfortunately, they were it.
Given the current state of the White House and given the possibilities that may follow this stuffed shirt Kenyan Muslim, I'm definitely not going to be on the "trash Bush" train. I've seen enough of that over the last eight years.
-
Real answer?
Year 8 of demonizing Bush. Liberal media -- yes, this rag and 60 minutes -- spent the last eight years throwing shade on Bush. This is an extension of that.
We have a Muslim terror sympathizing euro socialist in the White House. A true danger to this nation and its way of life. Yet everything is Bush's fault.
I don't know the particulars of what he did or didn't do. I don't know what maintaining at least one ally in that desert hellhole required him to do. We definitely had no friends in Libya, Iraq, Iran, Afghsnistan, Pakistan.... Maybe not destroying our relationship with the Saudi government over the actions of a few rogue assholes was a necessary evil.
The world isn't black and white. Obama and Clinton are far more evil and destructive than Bush could ever be.
Don't necessarily disagree but the ny post kind of gave the story some semi legit legs.
-
Here is a thought, read the article and look at the sources quoted in the story. Goes a long way in helping you not look like a dumbass. Seriously. If you write this off as nothing more than the liberal media throwing shade at W, you're a knuckle dragging, mouth breathing, retarded fucking idiot. With all due respect of course.
-
Here is a thought, read the article and look at the sources quoted in the story. Goes a long way in helping you not look like a dumbass. Seriously. If you write this off as nothing more than the liberal media throwing shade at W, you're a knuckle dragging, mouth breathing, retarded fucking idiot. With all due respect of course.
I'm saying I don't really care. That's what I'm saying.
I don't know what his reasons were. I do know raining hell on Saudi isn't the smartest idea. They may have individual assholes, but as a whole they're about our only semi-friend in the region at that time. Whatever happened, whatever was done, there are times that it's not our place to second guess. In times of war, sometimes you have to make horrible decisions. I don't know if this is one or not, but it does happen.
I don't care if Reagan sold weapons to the Contras. Sometimes you do what you have to do. Sometimes you take a bitter pill in order to avoid a worse illness.
And yes, the liberal media, Hussein Obama and every democrat in America has been slinging mud at Bush for eight long years. The policies of Bill Clinton led to a large percentage of the struggles Bush endured -- and for that matter, some Obama is getting tagged with, too.
I'm tired of it. I'm tired of this entire cycle of liberals trashing people after the fact. They tried to drag Reagan through the mud for years. Still try. And they've been riding the Bush horse for almost a decade. Is it true that he didn't want the Saudis to become our enemies? Did he (or someone in his employ, perhaps Cheney or Powell or whoever) "protect" the Saudis so that entire region didn't blow up in our face? Maybe so.
If so? It's STILL less horrific or egregious than Hellary Clinton's decisions in regard to Libya or her callous disregard for our people in Benghazi. It's still less offensive than the decisions made by this stuffed shirt terror sympathizer in regard to Israel, Russia, Syria, Afghanistan, any of the middle east nations, or the US military.
-
I'm saying I don't really care. That's what I'm saying.
I don't know what his reasons were. I do know raining hell on Saudi isn't the smartest idea. They may have individual assholes, but as a whole they're about our only semi-friend in the region at that time. Whatever happened, whatever was done, there are times that it's not our place to second guess. In times of war, sometimes you have to make horrible decisions. I don't know if this is one or not, but it does happen.
I don't care if Reagan sold weapons to the Contras. Sometimes you do what you have to do. Sometimes you take a bitter pill in order to avoid a worse illness.
And yes, the liberal media, Hussein Obama and every democrat in America has been slinging mud at Bush for eight long years. The policies of Bill Clinton led to a large percentage of the struggles Bush endured -- and for that matter, some Obama is getting tagged with, too.
I'm tired of it. I'm tired of this entire cycle of liberals trashing people after the fact. They tried to drag Reagan through the mud for years. Still try. And they've been riding the Bush horse for almost a decade. Is it true that he didn't want the Saudis to become our enemies? Did he (or someone in his employ, perhaps Cheney or Powell or whoever) "protect" the Saudis so that entire region didn't blow up in our face? Maybe so.
If so? It's STILL less horrific or egregious than Hellary Clinton's decisions in regard to Libya or her callous disregard for our people in Benghazi. It's still less offensive than the decisions made by this stuffed shirt terror sympathizer in regard to Israel, Russia, Syria, Afghanistan, any of the middle east nations, or the US military.
The entire region has blown up since then. Its as bad as its ever been.
-
If so? It's STILL less horrific or egregious than Hellary Clinton's decisions in regard to Libya or her callous disregard for our people in Benghazi. It's still less offensive than the decisions made by this stuffed shirt terror sympathizer in regard to Israel, Russia, Syria, Afghanistan, any of the middle east nations, or the US military.
Yeah, no.
-
Yeah, no.
Yeah. Double infinity.
-
I'm just gonna throw this out there. Maybe. Just maybe if we cut off the supply of funding the terrorist get then maybe they can't afford to buy rockets to kill our troops with. The former FBI workers in the above article claim the Saudis are the ones funding the global jihad. I'm not saying turn that sandlot into glass but lets not pretend those fuck faces are our allies. I mean they are claiming the fucking ambassador's family, Prince Bandar, transferred $130k to one of the hijackers handlers pre 9/11 for crying out loud. No the day to bomb their ass passed almost 15 years ago when our oil tycoon president decided to share a cigar with that sob on the White House balcony 2 fucking days after 9/11 and told him not to worry, oil is thicker than blood. Instead we decide to go to war with a country that didn't have shit to do with 9/11, claim they were a threat cause they had weapons of mass destruction [which they didn't], and in turn cause the entire region to completely go to shit. All at the expense of thousands of our troops lives and over 2 trillion dollars to boot. Yet people really want to bitch about Obama and Hillary instead? Smfh. Fuck W. I'll say it again, the motherfucker should be tried for treason and hung on public T.V.