Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: AUownsU on September 06, 2015, 10:56:14 AM

Title: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: AUownsU on September 06, 2015, 10:56:14 AM
How does the X chalk up JJ's performance? Was it an aberration or something more? Some seem to think Gus could've done a better job easing him into the game. Don't think we threw any bubble screen's. However as much as we've been hearing how JJ gives the chance to run all of the playbook and can identify all the coverages, should we really have to ease him into the game?
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: dallaswareagle on September 06, 2015, 12:13:10 PM
Lets hope it was first game jitters. That team that played yesterday loses at least 3 games this year,
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: Jumbo on September 06, 2015, 12:16:56 PM
I think 2 of our 3 running back going down in the first half caused Jounson to force the ball.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: jmar on September 06, 2015, 03:27:34 PM
How does the X chalk up JJ's performance? Was it an aberration or something more? Some seem to think Gus could've done a better job easing him into the game. Don't think we threw any bubble screen's. However as much as we've been hearing how JJ gives the chance to run all of the playbook and can identify all the coverages, should we really have to ease him into the game?
Yeah the word from Gus was that he'd mastered the playbook and based on what we saw last season he could find the open man. I agree w Dallas too about three loses. But we know the corrections will have us playing much better.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: CCTAU on September 06, 2015, 03:46:03 PM
I saw greedy play calling. For the most part, JJ made a lot of the quick throws. The issue was when we wanted to go for broke. There never seemed to be that one guy floating across the middle. In 2010, Cam hit Darvin many times on those types of plays. Which brings us back to the middle I the field. Out passes consisted of deep posts or deep slants. There was never that dig route that allows Duke to cross in front of the safety. Those are the routes that NM could not see. Those are the ones that JJ is supposed to be best at.
This looked like mug and play without NM. Thu changed to iffense more for the firs half of the Arky game last year than they did the whole off season.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: jmar on September 06, 2015, 04:34:23 PM
Replay of game at 6:30- SEC network.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: chinook on September 06, 2015, 04:59:17 PM
Replay of game at 6:30- SEC network.

Pacific?
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: WiregrassTiger on September 06, 2015, 05:58:30 PM
I give him a D-. The only thing that stopped an F is that he didn't quit.

He's better than he played and we need to stop making excuses for him, IMO.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: jmar on September 06, 2015, 07:48:46 PM
Pacific?
Sorry I failed to add zone. I thought it CST bc it was on my Spectrum program log thingy.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: jmar on September 06, 2015, 08:21:28 PM
I give him a D-. The only thing that stopped an F is that he didn't quit.

He's better than he played and we need to stop making excuses for him, IMO.
Meanwhile Shaky Jake Coker has vaulted to the head of the class among Heisman would be's.
The surprise starter trotted cooly onto the scene that is Jerry's World and signaled to all of the Bama faithful,
" I got this, Roh Tahd!"
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: Snaggletiger on September 06, 2015, 08:38:16 PM
He had some really bad throws.  He had some great throws.  A couple were full tard on his part.  A couple were horrible calls from Malzahn/Lashlee.  Several were "Yeah baby". 

I face palmed on a couple of throws but I'm not even close to pushing a panic button.  JJ has been hyped like a mofo by the press for no apparent reason.  Nothing to base it on.  We were hoping he'd come out and go 24-29  350 yards and 3 TD's.  This was a damn good D and he was hot and cold against them on a HUGE stage.  I'm a JJ man all the way.  I also think Malzahn/Lashlee have some look in the mirror moments coming up this week.  That was as bad a game as I've seen called since they arrived.  Now Muschamp...pay the man his money.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: ssgaufan on September 06, 2015, 08:46:51 PM
The deep ball for a TD that got called back was a thing of beauty.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: jmar on September 06, 2015, 08:47:13 PM
He had some really bad throws.  He had some great throws.  A couple were full tard on his part.  A couple were horrible calls from Malzahn/Lashlee.  Several were "Yeah baby". 

I face palmed on a couple of throws but I'm not even close to pushing a panic button.  JJ has been hyped like a mofo by the press for no apparent reason.  Nothing to base it on.  We were hoping he'd come out and go 24-29  350 yards and 3 TD's.  This was a damn good D and he was hot and cold against them on a HUGE stage.  I'm a JJ man all the way.  I also think Malzahn/Lashlee have some look in the mirror moments coming up this week.  That was as bad a game as I've seen called since they arrived.  Now Muschamp...pay the man his money.
He's not the second coming people!
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: jmar on September 06, 2015, 08:49:08 PM
The deep ball for a TD that got called back was a thing of beauty.
Yessir...yes it was.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: Snaggletiger on September 06, 2015, 08:53:31 PM
The deep ball for a TD that got called back was a thing of beauty.

This. Don't lose any faith, folks.  Name a QB who hasn't flourished under Malzahn.  Wait...Barrett Tro....okay...hold on.  Seriously...patience.  This kid is going to do some awesome things.  Totally fine with Jeremy Johnson running the show.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: The Six on September 06, 2015, 09:46:05 PM
How soon y'all forget it could have been A LOT worse.

(https://nbccollegefootballtalk.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/clint-moseley1.jpg?w=250)
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: AUownsU on September 06, 2015, 09:57:57 PM
The thing that concerns me most is how plain awful some of those throws were. We're are talking multiple throws into triple coverage and 2 ints thrown right to the defender. As in the mfer didn't even have to move. QB is as much mental as anything else and I wonder where Johnson is mentally right now.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: jmar on September 06, 2015, 10:14:25 PM
This. Don't lose any faith, folks.  Name a QB who hasn't flourished under Malzahn.  Wait...Barrett Tro....okay...hold on.  Seriously...patience.  This kid is going to do some awesome things.  Totally fine with Jeremy Johnson running the show.
I haven't lost faith, will show more patience and look forward to awesomeness.
WDS!
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: WiregrassTiger on September 06, 2015, 10:23:40 PM
I watched JJ on SECN tonight and he really didn't look any better against Louisville than in the game last night. Is this the best of 3? I did not know that they started scheduling football like baseball but I like that. There was a good crowd in the dome tonight too.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: djsimp on September 07, 2015, 12:18:38 AM
I'm not concerned with JJ, just want him to take this as a motivational tool. There is no doubt this was not his norm. The half glass full side of me says this bad game will reap great benefits for him and AU the rest of the season. Likeemtioned, this RB Corp is bad ass and will remove some of the pressures of his shoulders. Not to mention, our D is mo betta than the last several years.
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: chinook on September 07, 2015, 12:25:23 AM
I watched JJ on SECN tonight and he really didn't look any better against Louisville than in the game last night. Is this the best of 3? I did not know that they started scheduling football like baseball but I like that. There was a good crowd in the dome tonight too.

It gets worse the more you read watch it...
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: Jumbo on September 07, 2015, 03:48:03 AM
It gets worse the more you read watch it...
#twss
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: jmar on September 07, 2015, 06:54:28 AM
I'm not concerned with JJ, just want him to take this as a motivational tool. There is no doubt this was not his norm. The half glass full side of me says this bad game will reap great benefits for him and AU the rest of the season. Likeemtioned, this RB Corp is bad ass and will remove some of the pressures of his shoulders. Not to mention, our D is mo betta than the last several years.
If there's a silver lining for the fan it's that one more awful display will likely deter thoughts of a Junior exit for a bigger contract.
I'll admit that I had visions of sugar plums after seeing JJ work the intermediate stuff last season. Don't know if Grantham was baiting us but our dynamic duo on the sidelines has to show some restraint as well. Love that our offense has that go for broke element. Can only wonder what Muschamp must be thinking.   
Title: Re: Jeremy Johnson
Post by: jmar on September 08, 2015, 12:11:27 PM
JJ is a better comparison to Jason Campbell, quicker release  maybe. Remains to be seen but it's a bit different having Carnell and Ronnie to lean on as opposed to our unproven run game. Just gonna take time to gel. He might have to run more I just hope it doesn't become a necessity. Why? Because this is a tough league, it's hard to stay healthy and I want him to be at his best toward the season's end.