Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports
Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Buzz Killington on September 29, 2012, 09:32:45 PM
-
Ole Miss is determined to stop the run, it seems.
-
I think Ole Miss will be fairly pesky and hang around a little longer than I would like in this one.
-
I think Ole Miss will be fairly pesky and hang around a little longer than I would like in this one.
You need to be more patient.
-
You need to be more patient.
I heard its a virture?
-
You need to be more patient.
Teabaggers are at their best when it's 66-3 and they need another score. Row Tahd!
-
Wow...Ole Miss is sooooo fast!!!
-
Wow...Ole Miss is sooooo fast!!!
Them Mississippi boys sure fall in a hurry.
-
Good call on the replay. He never bobbled the ball and had one foot in bounds. That one side angle was a good shot. If he had bobbled it I would see them staying with the ruling on the field.
-
Announcer in LSU game just said Auburn's mike linebacker should consider another line of work after getting plowed constantly by Copeland.
:facepalm:
-
Announcer in LSU game just said Auburn's mike linebacker should consider another line of work after getting plowed constantly by Copeland.
:facepalm:
I thought his name was Jake?
-
I thought his name was Jake?
He goin' incognito.
-
Announcer in LSU game just said Auburn's mike linebacker should consider another line of work after getting plowed constantly by Copeland.
:facepalm:
He's improving
-
He's improving
At what?
-
At what?
Use of hair product
-
He's improving
Hell I might change my name too if the team can improve.
Just call me Mofo for the rest of this season. And try and exercize some fucking patience will ya?
-
At what?
Backpedaling for one
-
Ole Miss is playing pretty damn good right now. They're playing a little above their heads I think, but playing well nonetheless. With a new coach, new system and coordinators, and a starting QB that was a pro-style guy that now runs a HUNH. I'll be damned.
-
Nope no referee advantage....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ms-Y7wODwKQ&feature=colike
Notice, he checks the marker before placing the ball. SMH, not only do you have more talent on the field (HGH), better coaches, the announcers, but you need to have the refs too (just in case you have holding and/or blocking in the back on Punt or Int. returns, you need those extra hidden yards or have a called incomplete pass reviewed...just go ahead and make that a TD).
-
Ole Miss is playing pretty damn good right now. They're playing a little above their heads I think, but playing well nonetheless. With a new coach, new system and coordinators, and a starting QB that was a pro-style guy that now runs a HUNH. I'll be damned.
Too bad it doesn't work both ways...
-
Nope no referee advantage....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ms-Y7wODwKQ&fea%20ture=youtu.be
Notice, he checks the market before placing the ball. SMH, not only do you have more talent on the field (HGH), better coaches, the announcers, but you need to have the refs too (just in case you have holding and/or blocking in the back on Punt or Int. returns, you need those extra hidden yards or have a called incomplete pass reviewed...just go ahead and make that a TD).
Seriously? So, that's the only way Alabama is winning. Hidden yards. Gotcha. That TD was a TD. He had the ball in his hands, never bobbled it, and one foot was on the ground. I don't know what more you want.
Just curious.....what's your excuse going to be when Ole Miss beats AU? They have new coaches, new system, new head coach, and a pro-style QB that now runs a HUNH spread. They look 200% better than last year. How can Ole Miss possibly be playing well this season?
-
Bama was meh tonight. O line got their asses whipped. No calls to stretch the field. Running game was bottled up all night. Defense couldn't get off the field on two big drives. Unimpressive.
Really, I haven't seen a team that is unbeatable this season.
-
Seriously? So, that's the only way Alabama is winning. Hidden yards. Gotcha. That TD was a TD. He had the ball in his hands, never bobbled it, and one foot was on the ground. I don't know what more you want.
Just curious.....what's your excuse going to be when Ole Miss beats AU? They have new coaches, new system, new head coach, and a pro-style QB that now runs a HUNH spread. They look 200% better than last year. How can Ole Miss possibly be playing well this season?
They don't need patience?
-
Bama was meh tonight. O line got their asses whipped. No calls to stretch the field. Running game was bottled up all night. Defense couldn't get off the field on two big drives. Unimpressive.
Really, I haven't seen a team that is unbeatable this season.
I think Ole Miss certainly played better than Alabama tonight; if that makes any sense.
-
Bama was meh tonight. O line got their asses whipped. No calls to stretch the field. Running game was bottled up all night. Defense couldn't get off the field on two big drives. Unimpressive.
Really, I haven't seen a team that is unbeatable this season.
Hard for even Alabama to play inspired football every week.
-
Hard for even Alabama to play inspired football every week.
This.
When uat doesn't play inspired football they beat a team, that treated the game as their Super Bowl, 33-14.
Btw, rws, Auburn will beat Ole Miss worse than 33-14.
-
This.
When uat doesn't play inspired football they beat a team, that treated the game as their Super Bowl, 33-14.
Btw, rws, Auburn will beat Ole Miss worse than 33-14.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Jesus, Prowler. Given the current state of the offense, it would take four years to get 33 points.
And I'll make a loser leaves the board for a week wager if OM scores 14 or less on AU. They're going to score in the high 20s.
-
Btw, rws, Auburn will beat Ole Miss worse than 33-14.
Yeah, I can't even take that seriously. I'm guessing you're hinging this on the performance against LSU? Towson (a 2-2 Div II team) scored twice as many points on LSU than AU did. In Death Valley. They gained more yards than AU did, and LSU only gained 50 more yards against them than against AU. LSU never even put in their backup QB. Played Mettenberger the whole game. LSU has issues.
I'm still wondering what your answer is about Ole Miss, though. They look way better than last season even after changing systems, head coaches, and coordinators. They went from a pro-style offense to HUNH spread. Their starting QB is a sophomore pro-style QB with a rating of 151.5, 717 yards, 64% completion rate, and averages over 8 yards a throw. And they don't even have the talent that half of the SEC does. How is it that Ole Miss has actually improved from last year while changing literally everything about their program? They will win more games this year than the previous two years combined. They've already won more games than all of last season.
-
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Jesus, Prowler. Given the current state of the offense, it would take four years to get 33 points.
And I'll make a loser leaves the board for a week wager if OM scores 14 or less on AU. They're going to score in the high 20s.
You got it.
-
:popcorn:
-
Yeah, I can't even take that seriously. I'm guessing you're hinging this on the performance against LSU? Towson (a 2-2 Div II team) scored twice as many points on LSU than AU did. In Death Valley. They gained more yards than AU did, and LSU only gained 50 more yards against them than against AU. LSU never even put in their backup QB. Played Mettenberger the whole game. LSU has issues.
I'm still wondering what your answer is about Ole Miss, though. They look way better than last season even after changing systems, head coaches, and coordinators. They went from a pro-style offense to HUNH spread. Their starting QB is a sophomore pro-style QB with a rating of 151.5, 717 yards, 64% completion rate, and averages over 8 yards a throw. And they don't even have the talent that half of the SEC does. How is it that Ole Miss has actually improved from last year while changing literally everything about their program? They will win more games this year than the previous two years combined. They've already won more games than all of last season.
Yes LSU has issues, but your gump ass is in for a rude awakening when UAT visits the land of corndogs.
-
Yes LSU has issues, but your gump ass is in for a rude awakening when UAT visits the land of corndogs.
I'm curious to see how McFondles reacts to finally getting his jersey dirty this year. LSU will bring the heat.
-
I'm curious to see how McFondles reacts to finally getting his jersey dirty this year. LSU will bring the heat.
Just hope Miles and Chavis are smart enough to get their d-linemen to grease their jerseys before the game. The UAT o-linemen will have a harder time tackleing them that way.
-
Yes LSU has issues, but your gump ass is in for a rude awakening when UAT visits the land of corndogs.
Is Alabama beatable? Absolutely. No question about it. But I don't think LSU will be the team to do it. I'm not sure what exactly is going on with LSU. Maybe they're all smoking spice. Maybe it's because their QB looks like a child molester. Maybe they changed the fertilizer used on their field and Miles isn't getting all the nutrients he needs from eating the grass. I don't know. But this isn't an LSU team like the years past.
-
Is Alabama beatable? Absolutely. No question about it. But I don't think LSU will be the team to do it. I'm not sure what exactly is going on with LSU. Maybe they're all smoking spice. Maybe it's because their QB looks like a child molester. Maybe they changed the fertilizer used on their field and Miles isn't getting all the nutrients he needs from eating the grass. I don't know. But this isn't an LSU team like the years past.
Maybe, maybe not. Yet a couple of things I've noticed and think will be important..
1. People sure as hell didn't have this feeling you talk about before the Auburn game. Also I think people put way to much credence into that game. LSU has never been that succesful in JH. That was their 4th win in 30 years there (with 2 of those over lameduck coaches), it was a night game, and Auburn was kinda pissed and needed to prove their manhood (thank you DA LSU FB)
2. The game with Harvey U will depend on LSU's attitude. If those boys are as pissed off as I think they will be due to last years showing Uat is gonna be in for a hell of a time. Honestly, I don't see ya'lls running game breaking loose and if that happens I don't chest tat beating LSU by himself. Not on the road.
-
Maybe, maybe not. Yet a couple of things I've noticed and think will be important..
1. People sure as hell didn't have this feeling you talk about before the Auburn game. Also I think people put way to much credence into that game. LSU has never been that succesful in JH. That was their 4th win in 30 years there (with 2 of those over lameduck coaches), it was a night game, and Auburn was kinda pissed and needed to prove their manhood (thank you DA LSU FB)
2. The game with Harvey U will depend on LSU's attitude. If those boys are as pissed off as I think they will be due to last years showing Uat is gonna be in for a hell of a time. Honestly, I don't see ya'lls running game breaking loose and if that happens I don't chest tat beating LSU by himself. Not on the road.
LSU had only played North Texas, Idaho, and Washington prior to playing AU, and they looked fairly sharp doing it. While those results should be taken with a grain of salt, that's all anybody had to go with. LSU looked pretty bad against AU. Granted, AU's defense certainly caused some of that. But from a fundamental standpoint, you know Mettenberger is not very good. Then the week after that LSU struggles with Towson. I think LSU will lose to UF next week. I was in the camp that thought LSU may be unstoppable. The past few games, they have shown that they are just waiting to be beaten.
-
LSU had only played North Texas, Idaho, and Washington prior to playing AU, and they looked fairly sharp doing it. While those results should be taken with a grain of salt, that's all anybody had to go with. LSU looked pretty bad against AU. Granted, AU's defense certainly caused some of that. But from a fundamental standpoint, you know Mettenberger is not very good. Then the week after that LSU struggles with Towson. I think LSU will lose to UF next week. I was in the camp that thought LSU may be unstoppable. The past few games, they have shown that they are just waiting to be beaten.
Lsu will smash UF, don't let that Townsen game twist your thinking, I know you're a inbred bammer so you're already behind the 8 ball in the thinking department. If you think, for a second, that they actually spent a fare amount of time on practicing for Townsen, then you obviously have no clue (they worked on themselves and prepared for UF, it's called a look ahead game for a reason).
uat has their letdown game (emotional letdown game comes after playing a heated/hated rival) & look ahead game (looking ahead to the bigger game) when they play MSU.
-
Lsu will smash UF, don't let that Townsen game twist your thinking, I know you're a inbred bammer so you're already behind the 8 ball in the thinking department. If you think, for a second, that they actually spent a fare amount of time on practicing for Townsen, then you obviously have no clue (they worked on themselves and prepared for UF, it's called a look ahead game for a reason).
uat has their letdown game (emotional letdown game comes after playing a heated/hated rival) & look ahead game (looking ahead to the bigger game) when they play MSU.
I don't think that UF will beat LSU based on the Towson game. I think they will beat LSU based on what I have seen from the two teams recently. UF is getting better and better each game, they have a top 20 defense, and they will be at home. LSU is struggling, their OL is porous, and their QB has issues. Given LSU's performances the past few weeks, and the fact that they had to go to the wire against AU to win in Jordan-Hare, I just don't see how you can rationally assume this will be a blood bath in Gainesville. I'm not saying there is no way in hell that LSU will win, I'm just saying personally I find it more likely that UF will win.
As far as MSU is concerned, Alabama routinely stomps their shit by 3 scores on average. Nothing has really changed with them. The game will be in Tuscaloosa. Not worried about it. Alabama usually has Tennessee before LSU anyway, and it hasn't really seemed to change anything.
Also, are you going to answer my question about Ole Miss from page 2 of the thread?
-
Lsu will smash UF,
I'll be picking UF in Battle for The Crown.
-
I'll be picking UF in Battle for The Crown.
I'm going to put 2 or 3 points on them as well. I don't think UF is going to kill LSU, but I can see them pulling away late in the 4th quarter and winning by a TD. That game really is a pick 'em and give the edge to UF because of defense and being at home.
-
I'll be picking UF in Battle for The Crown.
I see what you did there. :bugs:
-
Lsu-uf game will be over by the middle of the 3rd qtr. in Lsu's favor.
-
Seriously? So, that's the only way Alabama is winning. Hidden yards. Gotcha. That TD was a TD. He had the ball in his hands, never bobbled it, and one foot was on the ground. I don't know what more you want.
Just curious.....what's your excuse going to be when Ole Miss beats AU? They have new coaches, new system, new head coach, and a pro-style QB that now runs a HUNH spread. They look 200% better than last year. How can Ole Miss possibly be playing well this season?
Damn, you really have trouble comprehending what you read.
Also, might want to check and see who Ole Miss has played so far, before you say that they're 200% better:
Central Arkansas (W 49-27)
UTEP (W 28-10)
Texas (L Ass Raping)
@Tulane (W 39-0)
@uat (L Never had a chance)
-
Damn, you really have trouble comprehending what you read.
Also, might want to check and see who Ole Miss has played so far, before you say that they're 200% better:
Central Arkansas (W 49-27)
UTEP (W 28-10)
Texas (L Ass Raping)
@Tulane (W 39-0)
@uat (L Never had a chance)
If you watch how they play, they are 200% improved over last season. I would argue that their offense certainly looks better than Auburn's during this transition. And when you factor in that they will win 6-7 games this season, that beats the shit out of winning only 6 the past two seasons combined while getting your shit pushed in by Kentucky and Louisiana Tech and losing in OT to Jacksonville State. While 6 or 7 wins isn't where I would want Alabama to be, given the dumpster fire that Ole Miss was the past few seasons, .500 or better will be considered damn good progress for them. For comparisons sake, AU runs the risk of being a 6-7 win team in year 4 of it's HC with a fuckton of talent. Ole Miss is going to be a 6-7 win team in year one of a new HC from the Sun Belt conference with talent comparable to Vanderbilt.
-
If you watch how they play, they are 200% improved over last season. I would argue that their offense certainly looks better than Auburn's during this transition. And when you factor in that they will win 6-7 games this season, that beats the shit out of winning only 6 the past two seasons combined while getting your shit pushed in by Kentucky and Louisiana Tech and losing in OT to Jacksonville State. While 6 or 7 wins isn't where I would want Alabama to be, given the dumpster fire that Ole Miss was the past few seasons, .500 or better will be considered damn good progress for them. For comparisons sake, AU runs the risk of being a 6-7 win team in year 4 of it's HC with a fuckton of talent. Ole Miss is going to be a 6-7 win team in year one of a new HC from the Sun Belt conference with talent comparable to Vanderbilt.
You got all that from watching them go against a team that didn't realize it was playing a real game...and still got beat 33-14 by the sleep walking team? LMAO. Ole Miss might win 1 more game...MIGHT (Vandy), so your 2000000% theory will amount to nothing.
Texas A&M - L
Auburn - L
Bye Week
@Arkansas - L
@Georgia - L
Vandy - Tossup
@LSU - L
MSU - L
-
You got all that from watching them go against a team that didn't realize it was playing a real game...and still got beat 33-14 by the sleep walking team? LMAO. Ole Miss might win 1 more game...MIGHT (Vandy), so your 2000000% theory will amount to nothing.
Texas A&M - L
Auburn - L
Bye Week
@Arkansas - L
@Georgia - L
Vandy - Tossup
@LSU - L
MSU - L
No, it comes from watching a few of their games this season. It's called looking at the whole body of work and not just one game. You should try that sometime. Fuck, even if they only win 1 more game this year, they will have won twice as many as last year. An improvement, nonetheless.
I think that Ole Miss beats AU, Arky, Vandy, and MSU. If I had to pick a game I was least confident in, it would be MSU. But something tells me they're going to be fired up to win the Egg Bowl after all of these years.
-
No, it comes from watching a few of their games this season. It's called looking at the whole body of work and not just one game. You should try that sometime. Fuck, even if they only win 1 more game this year, they will have won twice as many as last year. An improvement, nonetheless.
I think that Ole Miss beats AU, Arky, Vandy, and MSU. If I had to pick a game I was least confident in, it would be MSU. But something tells me they're going to be fired up to win the Egg Bowl after all of these years.
The fact that this is not sarcasm is a clear sign of :facepalm:
Losing to the Rebs unless a Manning is at QB is some Armageddonish shit IMO.
-
Won't happen.
-
No, it comes from watching a few of their games this season. It's called looking at the whole body of work and not just one game. You should try that sometime. fudge, even if they only win 1 more game this year, they will have won twice as many as last year. An improvement, nonetheless.
I think that Ole Miss beats AU, Arky, Vandy, and MSU. If I had to pick a game I was least confident in, it would be MSU. But something tells me they're going to be fired up to win the Egg Bowl after all of these years.
I'm calling bullshit. You say your opinion of Ole Miss comes from watching a few games this year. I'd like to know which of those games you watched. Central Arky? Tulane? UTEP? The ass raping by Texas? Was that where you saw such dramatic improvement you come to the conclusion Ole Miss will win 7 games?
-
The fact that this is not sarcasm is a clear sign of :facepalm:
Losing to the Rebs unless a Manning is at QB is some Armageddonish shit IMO.
Jeavon Snead, says hello.
This is the first time in my life that I actually have to wonder if we beat Ole Miss and Vandy. Even in 2008 when we looked like dogshit against UT, I knew we would go to Nashville and beat the piss out of Vandy and I was wrong. I have to agree with the Nutless Sanggled one. Until we prove that we can put more than 20 points on the board against a non SunBelt opponent, then I have zero confidence that we can win a conference game this year.
-
I'm calling bullshit. You say your opinion of Ole Miss comes from watching a few games this year. I'd like to know which of those games you watched. Central Arky? Tulane? UTEP? The ass raping by Texas? Was that where you saw such dramatic improvement you come to the conclusion Ole Miss will win 7 games?
I watched their game against Texas and the Alabama game. Even though they got the shit beat out of them by Texas, they were playing alot better than last year. Texas is averaging close to 50 points a game, so that result doesn't surprise me. Ole Miss is not on the verge of competing for a championship or anything. But given the situation, they're better than most expected. Fuck, they have two more wins than AU at this point. Year one of a new everything, going from pro-style to HUNH, with a sophomore pro-style QB.
I'm not trying to be a dickfaced bammer with the comparison. Simply wondering how a program in shambles like Ole Miss can make the transition and show signs of improvement after making the change, but a program that appeared to be in it's prime like AU is sputtering. Especially with the likes of Prowler running around calling everybody morons because they're able to make the same connection to Ole Miss and other programs the same as I.
-
Fuck, they have two more wins than AU at this point.
I'll spare you the embarrassment of posting the two schedules side-by-side, dumbass.
-
I'll spare you the embarrassment of posting the two schedules side-by-side, dumbass.
I understand your point, and I can go with that. I think my point on that will be a little better made later on in the season, though. Part of the overall point is that they lost to the same type teams over the past two seasons. Jacksonville State, Louisiana Tech, etc. They looked absolutely hapless. They don't have the talent right now, but in year one, they appear to be executing fairly well even though they are losing. Their main problem right now is talent. And that's a good place to be right now if you're Hugh Freeze in year one. Not saying they're going to win a national championship next year with a good class. But you can watch them play and tell what's what.
-
Admittedly, the OM/Bama game was the first I had watched of either team this year. Kept switching back and forth during the UA/Meatchicken game just to catch the score but didn't really watch.
Impressions: Bama looked bored and uninterested. Like they knew it was in control and not a lot of fire. I do think they're missing a legitimate threat to rush the passer and while the O-line is one of the biggest and baddest on paper, they look suspect in giving solid protection to McTattoo. I knew WKU had a bunch of sacks and I wrote that off to again, being uninterested in who was lining up on the other side of the ball. And not that OM was exactly pounding McHeismanTalk, they still got through enough times to keep him from getting set.
OM does look better. How much better, I have no clue. They certainly got after it on defense and the offense looked, at times, quick and efficient. I believe they have A&M this weekend if I'm not mistaken.
-
Won't happen.
I'll reserve judgement on that until after I see us play Ark. Their Soph, JC t'fer QB seems, unlike Frazier, to grasp the system he is in for the first time ever. They'll score on our Defense.
-
I watched their game against Texas and the Alabama game. Even though they got the shit beat out of them by Texas, they were playing alot better than last year. Texas is averaging close to 50 points a game, so that result doesn't surprise me. Ole Miss is not on the verge of competing for a championship or anything. But given the situation, they're better than most expected. Fuck, they have two more wins than AU at this point. Year one of a new everything, going from pro-style to HUNH, with a sophomore pro-style QB.
I'm not trying to be a dickfaced bammer with the comparison. Simply wondering how a program in shambles like Ole Miss can make the transition and show signs of improvement after making the change, but a program that appeared to be in it's prime like AU is sputtering. Especially with the likes of Prowler running around calling everybody morons because they're able to make the same connection to Ole Miss and other programs the same as I.
â€A few of their games†means that you've seen more than two, which you apparently haven't. Next time, try not to sound like the babbling retard that everyone here thinks you are.
I thank alabamuh gets beat by everyone else on their schedule, every team that they play done gotten better 476% from last year.
Then a bama fan that hates the coaching staff along with everyone in the Ath. Dept. says, â€the fact that a Auburn fan posts that means something terrible is happening at bama.â€
-
Next time, try not to sound like the babbling retard that everyone here thinks you are.
Then I guess everyone here also smells the stench of red hot irony with a flaming touch of oblivious emanating from that pot/kettle statement.
-
â€A few of their games†means that you've seen more than two, which you apparently haven't. Next time, try not to sound like the babbling retard that everyone here thinks you are.
Fuck me. It's the pretty good vs. really good argument.
I thank alabamuh gets beat by everyone else on their schedule, every team that they play done gotten better 476% from last year.
Then a bama fan that hates the coaching staff along with everyone in the Ath. Dept. says, â€the fact that a Auburn fan posts that means something terrible is happening at bama.â€
I could attempt to further explain why you're a moron and missed the point totally, but it wouldn't do a bit of good. It just wouldn't. I will spare everybody reading this thread.
-
I understand your point, and I can go with that. I think my point on that will be a little better made later on in the season, though. Part of the overall point is that they lost to the same type teams over the past two seasons. Jacksonville State, Louisiana Tech, etc. They looked absolutely hapless. They don't have the talent right now, but in year one, they appear to be executing fairly well even though they are losing. Their main problem right now is talent. And that's a good place to be right now if you're Hugh Freeze in year one. Not saying they're going to win a national championship next year with a good class. But you can watch them play and tell what's what.
Oh no, rws, you're already stating that in the TWO games that you've watched them (both games where they got Donkey Punched), that they're 200% better.
-
Then I guess everyone here also smells the stench of red hot irony with a flaming touch of oblivious emanating from that pot/kettle statement.
:haha:
-
Oh no, rws, you're already stating that in the TWO games that you've watched them (both games where they got Donkey Punched), that they're 200% better.
Fuck me like a goat.
If you can't tell that Ole Miss is improved over last year, I can't help you. There's nothing that I'm going to be able to show you to prove it otherwise in your mind, regardless of how obvious it is. What games of theirs did you watch this season to decide that they are still a dumpster fire? They may have lost by 19 in Tuscaloosa, but if you watched it, I wouldn't exactly consider it a donkey punching. I would consider it an improvement over the Texas game. Not that Alabama is the greatest, but Ole Miss gave them fits on both sides of the ball. They were physical, looked confident in what they were doing, looked disciplined and well coached. Relatively speaking, they actually looked OK versus Texas also. Certainly better than last year. Also keep in mind that in the two deep on both sides of the ball, they have like 6 four star players. No bullshit. 6. No talent, new coaches, new systems, but improved over last year.
Why is it Auburn can improve while losing according to you, but NOBODY else can?
-
Fuck me like a goat.
If you can't tell that Ole Miss is improved over last year, I can't help you. There's nothing that I'm going to be able to show you to prove it otherwise in your mind, regardless of how obvious it is. What games of theirs did you watch this season to decide that they are still a dumpster fire? They may have lost by 19 in Tuscaloosa, but if you watched it, I wouldn't exactly consider it a donkey punching. I would consider it an improvement over the Texas game. Not that Alabama is the greatest, but Ole Miss gave them fits on both sides of the ball. They were physical, looked confident in what they were doing, looked disciplined and well coached. Relatively speaking, they actually looked OK versus Texas also. Certainly better than last year. Also keep in mind that in the two deep on both sides of the ball, they have like 6 four star players. No bullshit. 6. No talent, new coaches, new systems, but improved over last year.
Why is it Auburn can improve while losing according to you, but NOBODY else can?
Donkey punched is what State did to Auburn. Auburn stammered around in a daze and had a wake up call against Monroe. And there is no shame in losing to LSU although Kragthorpe and Malzahn must have both had time contraints working with the newbies but I'm sure our resident X coordinator can shed some light on the subject.
Although off to a slow start, I still say Frazier comes around and becomes a very good Auburn QB. No I do not think he can put up the gaudy numbers of Campbell or the comp. pcts. of Cox but I do think he will be a winner, better than serviceable. I do not have anything to back it up but I do think Loeffler will work with him on his mechanics to where the decision making on the field will come more naturally. And I only mention Frazier because so many have harped on the kid as if he was supposed to be ready to take the torch from Moseley, uh Trotter or was it...anyway I think the Malzahn's revolving QB cluster fuck slowed the progress or at least hurt the confidence of our RS Fr. And no I don't expect anyone to understand.
I did mention after last season that I hoped that someone would see fit to employ Cam's QB coach (Whitfield) or another to help hone the kid into something beyond a shotgun QB master of the four yard draw, or read option if you must. And you can go on with comparisons with others and I'm not going to put up much of an argument because I haven't seen enough of Frazier to proclaim him a total bust just because the A&M kid hit the scene like Tyler Wilson did against Auburn in 2010. But only time will tell and we have to take it game by game. We might even have to deal with another type of slowdown in growth to where he isn't allowed to progress due to the decisions of Chizik playing too conservative in far too many close games. But I think when Chiz talks about learning to win he is using the 2010 formula which was Cam saves the day, all fine and dandy when you have a cast of upperclassmen surrounding you but not so much when you are considered a veteran because you sprinted out on the field for half a season to help run the clock in an effort to keep the other team from scoring fifty.
And we all agreed that wasn't Auburn football and now we want it back immediately. But I can't hang the lack of development on the players when it seems to be across the board. And to think all along it must have been the lack of tutors. Huh! Go figure.
DEFENSE RESTS.
-
Fuck me like a goat.
If you can't tell that Ole Miss is improved over last year, I can't help you. There's nothing that I'm going to be able to show you to prove it otherwise in your mind, regardless of how obvious it is. What games of theirs did you watch this season to decide that they are still a dumpster fire? They may have lost by 19 in Tuscaloosa, but if you watched it, I wouldn't exactly consider it a donkey punching. I would consider it an improvement over the Texas game. Not that Alabama is the greatest, but Ole Miss gave them fits on both sides of the ball. They were physical, looked confident in what they were doing, looked disciplined and well coached. Relatively speaking, they actually looked OK versus Texas also. Certainly better than last year. Also keep in mind that in the two deep on both sides of the ball, they have like 6 four star players. No bullshit. 6. No talent, new coaches, new systems, but improved over last year.
Why is it Auburn can improve while losing according to you, but NOBODY else can?
Ole Miss has improved, I'm not saying that they haven't...just not your 200% bullshit. They've improved just like when Auburn brought in their new staff in 2009 (with one of the most hated QB in Auburn's history, Chris Todd). Which btw, I stated then to have some patience with him and see what he could do, eventhough a few here were already writing off the season and then even more in 2010.
-
Really what I have heard in all of this is the Alabama = Ole Miss.
Got it.
-
Really what I have heard in all of this is the Alabama = Ole Miss.
Got it.
And I got Texas>Bama, as well.
-
And I got Texas>Bama, as well.
So really what we have here is Texas>Ole Miss=UAT
-
So really what we have here is Texas>Ole Miss=UAT
Black Bears = Elephants?
-
Black Bears = Elephants?
Rebels = The Machine
-
Donkey punched is what State did to Auburn. Auburn stammered around in a daze and had a wake up call against Monroe. And there is no shame in losing to LSU although Kragthorpe and Malzahn must have both had time contraints working with the newbies but I'm sure our resident X coordinator can shed some light on the subject.
Although off to a slow start, I still say Frazier comes around and becomes a very good Auburn QB. No I do not think he can put up the gaudy numbers of Campbell or the comp. pcts. of Cox but I do think he will be a winner, better than serviceable. I do not have anything to back it up but I do think Loeffler will work with him on his mechanics to where the decision making on the field will come more naturally. And I only mention Frazier because so many have harped on the kid as if he was supposed to be ready to take the torch from Moseley, uh Trotter or was it...anyway I think the Malzahn's revolving QB cluster fuck slowed the progress or at least hurt the confidence of our RS Fr. And no I don't expect anyone to understand.
I did mention after last season that I hoped that someone would see fit to employ Cam's QB coach (Whitfield) or another to help hone the kid into something beyond a shotgun QB master of the four yard draw, or read option if you must. And you can go on with comparisons with others and I'm not going to put up much of an argument because I haven't seen enough of Frazier to proclaim him a total bust just because the A&M kid hit the scene like Tyler Wilson did against Auburn in 2010. But only time will tell and we have to take it game by game. We might even have to deal with another type of slowdown in growth to where he isn't allowed to progress due to the decisions of Chizik playing too conservative in far too many close games. But I think when Chiz talks about learning to win he is using the 2010 formula which was Cam saves the day, all fine and dandy when you have a cast of upperclassmen surrounding you but not so much when you are considered a veteran because you sprinted out on the field for half a season to help run the clock in an effort to keep the other team from scoring fifty.
And we all agreed that wasn't Auburn football and now we want it back immediately. But I can't hang the lack of development on the players when it seems to be across the board. And to think all along it must have been the lack of tutors. Huh! Go figure.
DEFENSE RESTS.
Maybe the most cognizant and coherent thing you've ever written.
-
Rebels = The Machine
Dmac = Ewok
-
Dmac = Ewok
and Christy is the bimbo.
-
and Christy is the bimbo.
Christy isn't the bimbo I was screwing...it's an entirely different bimbo.
-
Christy isn't the bimbo I was screwing...it's an entirely different bimbo.
How many bimbos would you say there were?
-
How many bimbos would you say there were?
I misspoke myself. There weren't any bimbos at all.
-
Rebels = The Machine
The Grove > Tornado ravaged ghetto