Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: The Prowler on March 07, 2011, 03:42:44 AM

Title: Am I the only one that caught this little GEM?
Post by: The Prowler on March 07, 2011, 03:42:44 AM
In the Schlabach/Schad article about Oregon and the street agents...

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=6179423

Quote
The NCAA's renewed efforts come about four months after it was revealed that Kenny Rogers,
a former Mississippi State player, was involved in Heisman Trophy winner Cameron Newton recruiting.
The NCAA ruled that Cecil Newton, the player's father, was aware of Rogers' pay-for-play scheme to solicit
$180,000 from Mississippi State boosters before his son signed with Auburn.

I'm guessing that they'd hope that it would go unnoticed that they were going to have a BIG plate of Crow Shit served to them with that statement.
Title: Re: Am I the only one that caught this little GEM?
Post by: JR4AU on March 07, 2011, 08:08:39 AM
In the Schlabach/Schad article about Oregon and the street agents...

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=6179423

I'm guessing that they'd hope that it would go unnoticed that they were going to have a BIG plate of Crow Shit served to them with that statement.

What's your point?
Title: Re: Am I the only one that caught this little GEM?
Post by: The Prowler on March 07, 2011, 02:08:53 PM
What's your point?
My point?  Are you fucking serious?  Schad and Schlabach were two people that first "reported" on the issue.  Notice how they're saying that the NCAA stated that Rogers was the one that had the pay-for-play scheme not that Cecil was the one begging Universities to pay.  I think that's a pretty fucking important statement.
Title: Re: Am I the only one that caught this little GEM?
Post by: djsimp on March 07, 2011, 02:27:07 PM
My point?  Are you fucking serious?  Schad and Schlabach were two people that first "reported" on the issue.  Notice how they're saying that the NCAA stated that Rogers was the one that had the pay-for-play scheme not that Cecil was the one begging Universities to pay.  I think that's a pretty fucking important statement.

Thats true. They seem to have re-invented their statement.
Title: Re: Am I the only one that caught this little GEM?
Post by: JR4AU on March 07, 2011, 02:30:31 PM
My point?  Are you fucking serious?  Schad and Schlabach were two people that first "reported" on the issue.  Notice how they're saying that the NCAA stated that Rogers was the one that had the pay-for-play scheme not that Cecil was the one begging Universities to pay.  I think that's a pretty fucking important statement.

I asked YOUR point, not Schads.  I wasn't unaware of the difference, but am aware also that Schad's reporting is so haphazzard that it doesn't surprise me to see him seemingly shift gears, or forget the shit he made up 6 months ago.
Title: Re: Am I the only one that caught this little GEM?
Post by: GH2001 on March 07, 2011, 02:33:29 PM
My point?  Are you fucking serious?  Schad and Schlabach were two people that first "reported" on the issue.  Notice how they're saying that the NCAA stated that Rogers was the one that had the pay-for-play scheme not that Cecil was the one begging Universities to pay.  I think that's a pretty fucking important statement.

Good point. Thanks for posting that Harry.