Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on July 21, 2010, 09:42:13 AM

Title: Lollerskates!
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on July 21, 2010, 09:42:13 AM
Mike Bianchi...

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/sports_bianchi/2010/07/forget-southern-cal-alabama-is-ncaas-most-consistent-cheater.html/comment-page-1#comment-34719 (http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/sports_bianchi/2010/07/forget-southern-cal-alabama-is-ncaas-most-consistent-cheater.html/comment-page-1#comment-34719)

Quote
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — If you were the NCAA, at which football program would you have the most investigators?

    As I prepared to cover the annual Southeastern Conference Football Media Days, which begins today here in Birmingham, that was the question asked of me by one of bosses.

   Even with Southern Cal still dealing with the massive fallout from the Reggie Bush mess and Florida currently embroiled in a potential agent scandal involving  Maurkice Pouncey, Alabama still gets my vote as college football’s most consistently dirty program.

  If I were king of the NCAA, I would not only saturate Alabama with investigators, I would set up a branch office in Tuscaloosa.
  In Alabama, cheating is as much a part of the football lore as the houndstooth hat worn by Bear Bryant and that purty dress worn by Mike DuBose’s secretary.

 Alabama has seen it all over the last 20 years. Shady loans. Athletes illicitly accepting cash payments from agents and boosters. Multiple probations. Postseason bans. Scholarship reductions. Lack of institutional control. You name it, the Crimson Tide has done it.

  Welcome to Alabama, where the NCAA probations are nearly as prevalent as national championships. Actually, in the last decade, Alabama has recorded more NCAA probations (three) than it has national titles (one).

 It should also be noted that the iconic Bear Bryant may not have ever been caught cheating himself, but he tutored some of college football’s biggest outlaws.. Charley Pell, Pat Dye, Danny Ford and Jackie Sherrill all were Bear disciples who went on to provide some of the most unique interpretations of the NCAA rulebook in the history of college football.

  Roll Tide?

  Alabama’s rallying cry should be, “We Lied!”

  And maybe, too, Alabama should get rid of its elephant mascot and replace it with a pig.

  What better animal to symbolize the dirtiest, stinkiest program in recent NCAA history
.

Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Hogwally on July 21, 2010, 09:50:58 AM
     Well, I thought it was a great article until the last part.  Associating 'bama with pigs is an insult to the pigs.  I guess I'll have to find one of my "pigs smell good" buttons to send to this guy.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Snaggletiger on July 21, 2010, 09:53:55 AM
That's gonna' leave a big ole nasty welp.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: RWS on July 21, 2010, 10:02:00 AM
The institution didn't even do anything wrong in the whole Marcell Dareus thing. However, I'm not surprised that the sports editor from the Orlando Sentinal is taking an opportunity to take a swipe at the school anyway.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Snaggletiger on July 21, 2010, 10:03:46 AM
Paul Finebaum is the most powerful man in the SEC.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on July 21, 2010, 10:03:58 AM
The institution didn't even do anything wrong in the whole Marcell Dareus thing. However, I'm not surprised that the sports editor from the Orlando Sentinal is taking an opportunity to take a swipe at the school anyway.

Do you think it's possible that he thinks, or knows there's more to this, or more coming?  Maybe he's just got a hunch that when it comes to Alabama, it's not going to just be this easy?

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: GH2001 on July 21, 2010, 10:22:21 AM
Do you think it's possible that he thinks, or knows there's more to this, or more coming?  Maybe he's just got a hunch that when it comes to Alabama, it's not going to just be this easy?

Thoughts?

I like the way you think....but I would rather beat them on the field than in the papers/PR.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: No Huddle on July 21, 2010, 10:28:27 AM
If you ain't cheatin' you ain't tryin'.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Birmingham on July 21, 2010, 10:34:57 AM
I've always thought it was odd that I get so much shit as a Bama fan from Auburn fans about cheating.  Your fucking program is rotten.  You couldn't even play for a championship in an undefeated 1993 season because you cheated your brains out and were given a post season ban.  You weren't given a chance in an undefeated 2004 and I don't doubt it was because of being maybe the dirtiest program in college football.  Don't throw rocks if you live in glass houses you bunch of cheaters.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Snaggletiger on July 21, 2010, 10:38:38 AM
I've always thought it was odd that I get so much shit as a Bama fan from Auburn fans about cheating.  Your fucking program is rotten.  You couldn't even play for a championship in an undefeated 1993 season because you cheated your brains out and were given a post season ban.  You weren't given a chance in an undefeated 2004 and I don't doubt it was because of being maybe the dirtiest program in college football.  Don't throw rocks if you live in glass houses you bunch of cheaters.

See post directly above yours.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: RWS on July 21, 2010, 10:41:06 AM
Do you think it's possible that he thinks, or knows there's more to this, or more coming?  Maybe he's just got a hunch that when it comes to Alabama, it's not going to just be this easy?

Thoughts?
My thoughts are he has taken any opportunity possible to slam Saban and/or Alabama since Saban left Miami. I'm guessing pounding his alma mater in the SECCG probably didn't help matters either. Much like Prowler, I don't think he knows anything about it, other than what ESPN has reported.

Sure, even though the school had nothing to do with this, it still reflects poorly on the school. It's kind of the same deal when a player gets arrested. It's just bad to have your school's name associated with bad press. Still, going apeshit on the school itself because of this is a little misdirected.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: JR4AU on July 21, 2010, 10:46:50 AM
I've always thought it was odd that I get so much shit as a Bama fan from Auburn fans about cheating.  Your fucking program is rotten.  You couldn't even play for a championship in an undefeated 1993 season because you cheated your brains out and were given a post season ban.  You weren't given a chance in an undefeated 2004 and I don't doubt it was because of being maybe the dirtiest program in college football.  Don't throw rocks if you live in glass houses you bunch of cheaters.

^^^^ = vvvvvv

(http://home.deds.nl/~stygmata/forumspam/retard.jpg)
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: JR4AU on July 21, 2010, 10:50:03 AM
I've always thought it was odd that I get so much shit as a Bama fan from Auburn fans about cheating.  Your fucking program is rotten.  You couldn't even play for a championship in an undefeated 1993 season because you cheated your brains out and were given a post season ban.  You weren't given a chance in an undefeated 2004 and I don't doubt it was because of being maybe the dirtiest program in college football.  Don't throw rocks if you live in glass houses you bunch of cheaters.

BTW you stupid fucktard...it's "dammit" not "damnit"

http://www.tigersx.com/forum/index.php?topic=10010.0 (http://www.tigersx.com/forum/index.php?topic=10010.0)
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Snaggletiger on July 21, 2010, 11:10:28 AM
BTW you stupid fucktard...it's "dammit" not "damnit"

http://www.tigersx.com/forum/index.php?topic=10010.0 (http://www.tigersx.com/forum/index.php?topic=10010.0)


This question has always intrigued me.  If it's DAMN, then why change the spelling if you're simply adding an IT?  Technically, aren't you damning (or damming) a particular situation, issue or thing and if so, shouldn't the two be separated, as in DAMN IT?  (or damm it)

Example: If the NCAA decided not to punish Bama for its latest transgressions, you would appropriately use the term "Dammit" or "Damnit" or "Damn it" (Of course the usage in this instance would also be accompanied by "Dammit, Damnit or Damn it all to hell you cock sucking mother fuckers")

Which brings up another query.  Is mother fucker (motherfucker) a compound word?
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: AWK on July 21, 2010, 11:11:23 AM
I've always thought it was odd that I get so much shit as a Bama fan from Auburn fans about cheating.  Your fucking program is rotten.  You couldn't even play for a championship in an undefeated 1993 season because you cheated your brains out and were given a post season ban.  You weren't given a chance in an undefeated 2004 and I don't doubt it was because of being maybe the dirtiest program in college football.  Don't throw rocks if you live in glass houses you bunch of cheaters.
I ride my Lollerskates down the Lolcano!  Then I catch a ride on my roflcopter!

(http://i31.tinypic.com/29li5y0.gif)
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: JR4AU on July 21, 2010, 11:18:20 AM

This question has always intrigued me.  If it's DAMN, then why change the spelling if you're simply adding an IT?  Technically, aren't you damning (or damming) a particular situation, issue or thing and if so, shouldn't the two be separated, as in DAMN IT?  (or damm it)

Example: If the NCAA decided not to punish Bama for its latest transgressions, you would appropriately use the term "Dammit" or "Damnit" or "Damn it" (Of course the usage in this instance would also be accompanied by "Dammit, Damnit or Damn it all to hell you cock sucking mother fuckers")

Which brings up another query.  Is mother fucker (motherfucker) a compound word?

Words are some crazy ass shit! 
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Tiger Wench on July 21, 2010, 11:26:48 AM
I see the word "Dammit" as more of a Southernism - kind of like y'all and ain't.  That is jes how we sez it.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Buzz Killington on July 21, 2010, 11:29:05 AM
While we're on the grammar swing, I hate it when people misuse the word ironic.  Coincidence is not irony peoples.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Saniflush on July 21, 2010, 11:32:21 AM
While we're on the grammar swing, I hate it when people misuse the word ironic.  Coincidence is not irony peoples.

And while we are on a spelling kick I am tired of seeing Wien spelled Vienna and Praha spelled Prague.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Tiger Wench on July 21, 2010, 11:33:17 AM
And while we are on a spelling kick I am tired of seeing Wien spelled Vienna and Praha spelled Prague.
Take a deep breath, baby.  You're back among your own kind now.  Relax! No Frenchies here...
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: GH2001 on July 21, 2010, 11:39:45 AM
  That is jes how we sez it.

Thats not southern. Just ghetto.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Tiger Wench on July 21, 2010, 11:41:29 AM
Thats not southern. Just ghetto.
You have obviously never met any of my kinfolk from Sand Mountain...
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Saniflush on July 21, 2010, 11:45:31 AM
And while we are on a spelling kick I am tired of seeing Wien spelled Vienna and Praha spelled Prague.


That may be one of the only things they did right.  When a native of Praha or Wien spells it this way then that is all I need to know.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Snaggletiger on July 21, 2010, 11:48:09 AM
You have obviously never met any of my kinfolk from Sand Mountain...


There are no black folk on Sand Mountain.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: GH2001 on July 21, 2010, 11:49:51 AM

There are no black folk on Sand Mountain.

wench aint black?
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Tiger Wench on July 21, 2010, 11:52:15 AM
wench aint black?
I just play one on TV.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Snaggletiger on July 21, 2010, 11:52:31 AM
wench aint black?

She shortened her real name..Shawenchisha
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: GH2001 on July 21, 2010, 11:56:19 AM
Shawenchkrica Naitakipeshwia Jones
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Tiger Wench on July 21, 2010, 11:58:28 AM
Shawenchkrica Naitakipeshwia Jones
But you can call me Passionette.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: JR4AU on July 21, 2010, 12:02:09 PM
I see the word "Dammit" as more of a Southernism - kind of like y'all and ain't.  That is jes how we sez it.

Maybe...but it's a word.

http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/dammit (http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/dammit)
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: JR4AU on July 21, 2010, 12:03:16 PM

There are no black folk on Sand Mountain.

buncha brown folks though
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Snaggletiger on July 21, 2010, 02:14:39 PM
BTDub...our local sports talk guy was talking about the Marcel Derrier situation and he said, "Auburn fans can thank Tommy Tuberville for not being involved in this mess....because he didn't recruit anyone good enough to get invited to the party."

I have to admit, I chortled briefly.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: boartitz on July 21, 2010, 02:18:19 PM
BTDub...our local sports talk guy was talking about the Marcel Derrier situation and he said, "Auburn fans can thank Tommy Tuberville for not being involved in this mess....because he didn't recruit anyone good enough to get invited to the party."

I have to admit, I chortled briefly.
We heard the same joke. Just substitute Nutt for Tubby.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Tiger Six on July 21, 2010, 04:52:27 PM
I've always thought it was odd that I get so much poop as a Bama fan from Auburn fans about cheating.  Your phuking program is rotten.  You couldn't even play for a championship in an undefeated 1993 season because you cheated your brains out and were given a post season ban.  You weren't given a chance in an undefeated 2004 and I don't doubt it was because of being maybe the dirtiest program in college football.  Don't throw rocks if you live in glass houses you bunch of cheaters.

Ladies and gentlemen, I'll be brief. The issue here is not whether we broke a few rules, or took a few liberties with our recruits - we did.

But you can't hold a whole football team responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted coachs. For if you do, then shouldn't we blame the whole college football system? And if the whole college football system is guilty, then isn't this an indictment of our educational institutions in general? I put it to you, Greg - isn't this an indictment of our entire American society? Well, you can do whatever you want to us, but we're not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America. Gentlemen!
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Snaggletiger on July 21, 2010, 04:56:41 PM
Ladies and gentlemen, I'll be brief. The issue here is not whether we broke a few rules, or took a few liberties with our recruits - we did.

But you can't hold a whole football team responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted coachs. For if you do, then shouldn't we blame the whole college football system? And if the whole college football system is guilty, then isn't this an indictment of our educational institutions in general? I put it to you, Greg - isn't this an indictment of our entire American society? Well, you can do whatever you want to us, but we're not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America. Gentlemen!



You're through.  Finished at Faber.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Godfather on July 21, 2010, 05:08:38 PM
Ladies and gentlemen, I'll be brief. The issue here is not whether we broke a few rules, or took a few liberties with our recruits - we did.

But you can't hold a whole football team responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted coachs. For if you do, then shouldn't we blame the whole college football system? And if the whole college football system is guilty, then isn't this an indictment of our educational institutions in general? I put it to you, Greg - isn't this an indictment of our entire American society? Well, you can do whatever you want to us, but we're not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America. Gentlemen!


He knows. He's Pre-Law
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Pell City Tiger on July 21, 2010, 07:15:28 PM
He knows. He's Pre-Law
I thought he was pre-med
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Godfather on July 22, 2010, 10:26:31 AM
I thought he was pre-med
Whats the difference
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: JR4AU on July 22, 2010, 10:27:29 AM
Whats the difference

Pre Med is for the smart kids.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Saniflush on July 22, 2010, 10:32:22 AM
Pre Med is for the smart kids.

Fail
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: JR4AU on July 22, 2010, 10:33:14 AM
Fail

That's why I was pre law.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Buzz Killington on July 22, 2010, 10:34:34 AM
That's why I was pre law.
Don't screw around, they're serious this time!
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: JR4AU on July 22, 2010, 10:43:11 AM
Don't screw around, they're serious this time!

Take it easy, I'm pre law.
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Godfather on July 22, 2010, 01:35:23 PM
Well this fuckin thread just went to hell
Title: Re: Lollerskates!
Post by: Snaggletiger on July 22, 2010, 02:11:47 PM
Well this fuckin thread just went to hell

Just like my mama said