Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
The SGA / Re: What would it take?
« Last post by War Damn Six on Today at 05:05:48 PM »
We need better choices than these two.  Biden can’t cobble together a coherent sentence without being hopped up on something and Trump cobbles together insanity. 

This election is a nightmare.   
12
War Damn Eagle / Re: Did The Seat Just Go To Full Scorch?
« Last post by wesfau2 on Today at 04:59:52 PM »
I don't see much merit in it either; however, I'm looking at it more from the standpoint of Florida potentially having an out on Napier. Even if the suit fails, if they "investigate" and find Napier was involved, they can cut the chord, which I don't think they'd get much push back for from the fans.

Oh, sure.  There's some mud that they can throw on his contract now and force a mediated settlement.
13
The SGA / Re: What would it take?
« Last post by wesfau2 on Today at 04:59:08 PM »
None whatsoever. The hysterical beta left will scream over any idea. Trump is showing you the absurdity of the liberal controlled media. Your kind laps it up like dogs at the feet of your lord and savior barrack hussein obama. And I will gladly allow him to run for a third term IF he can change the constitution. I wish any candidate good luck with that.   

The close he gets to winning, the more desperate you look.

Weird.  Use of explicit Nazi language and a confirmed defiance of Constitutional constraints doesn't bother you?

I'm sorry to say that you guys have lost the plot.  This is Anti-American shit.
14
War Damn Eagle / Re: Did The Seat Just Go To Full Scorch?
« Last post by Snaggletiger on Today at 04:41:14 PM »
So, a non-enforceable commitment (the athlete's) was broken because the $$ (UF offer) didn't manifest?

Not seeing any contractual claims here.  Kid ended up with a DI scholly (unless he's going to make the really fun argument that a UF football scholly is worth that much more than a Pac 10/12...in some sort of detrimental reliance argument which would be really fun for CFB fans).

I don't see much merit in it either; however, I'm looking at it more from the standpoint of Florida potentially having an out on Napier. Even if the suit fails, if they "investigate" and find Napier was involved, they can cut the chord, which I don't think they'd get much push back for from the fans.
15
The SGA / Re: What would it take?
« Last post by CCTAU on Today at 04:37:01 PM »
"Unified Reich"?

Floating a 3rd term?

Still no concern?
None whatsoever. The hysterical beta left will scream over any idea. Trump is showing you the absurdity of the liberal controlled media. Your kind laps it up like dogs at the feet of your lord and savior barrack hussein obama. And I will gladly allow him to run for a third term IF he can change the constitution. I wish any candidate good luck with that.   

The close he gets to winning, the more desperate you look.
16
War Damn Eagle / Re: Did The Seat Just Go To Full Scorch?
« Last post by Snaggletiger on Today at 04:32:26 PM »
17
The SGA / Re: What would it take?
« Last post by wesfau2 on Today at 04:16:49 PM »
"Unified Reich"?

Floating a 3rd term?

Still no concern?
18
War Damn Eagle / Re: Did The Seat Just Go To Full Scorch?
« Last post by wesfau2 on Today at 03:52:04 PM »
Everything I post is from Fox News. I just make up source names to cover up my man love for DJT.

I love you, buddy.
19
War Damn Eagle / Re: Did The Seat Just Go To Full Scorch?
« Last post by wesfau2 on Today at 03:51:48 PM »
As it is against the rules for a coach to promise money, unless Napier DID promise the money in writing or on tape, I’m not sure there is a case against him.
He said, she said.

I read an analysis that said the timing of the case was predicated on the NCAA being neutified (Sherrill-style).  I haven't read enough to know if that's a valid take, but it's...a take.
20
War Damn Eagle / Re: Did The Seat Just Go To Full Scorch?
« Last post by wesfau2 on Today at 03:50:33 PM »

The controversy stems from accusations that Napier and his associates lured Rashada with promises of a highly lucrative NIL deal, only to renege on their commitment. This breach of trust reportedly led to Rashada withdrawing his commitment to UF, subsequently joining Arizona State University (ASU) before transferring yet again to Georgia, where he is expected to play backup to Carson Beck in 2024, with a view to becoming the starting quarterback the following year.


So, a non-enforceable commitment (the athlete's) was broken because the $$ (UF offer) didn't manifest?

Not seeing any contractual claims here.  Kid ended up with a DI scholly (unless he's going to make the really fun argument that a UF football scholly is worth that much more than a Pac 10/12...in some sort of detrimental reliance argument which would be really fun for CFB fans).

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10