Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
The SGA / Re: What would it take?
« Last post by Snaggletiger on April 25, 2024, 02:23:21 PM »
Are you actually trying to convey that striking a potential juror based on race is evidence of institutional racism? Seriously?

Because, I realize that I have brain damage and am very likely misunderstanding this. I actually hope that I am misunderstanding this and that I am the dumbass in this case. It certainly wouldn’t be the first time.

But if I am not mistaken and you actually are using this as evidence of institutional racism, you are the one with major problems. I mean as in, you should be disbarred for being a fucking idiot kind of problems.

If it’s the case, I would beat your ass so bad in a court case it would look like Snags vs Matlock. And I’d be Matlock.

You’d need that fat ass NY D.A. Bragg as the judge to have a shot.

That’s so fucking stupid that it actually doesn’t deserve a response. And I really have always thought you were fairly book smart and stuff. But, now? Fuck man.

Have you ever been checked for an aneurysm?

Matlock is dead, so I think I'd have a pretty good shot.
12
The SGA / Re: What would it take?
« Last post by WiregrassTiger on April 25, 2024, 01:34:15 PM »
Here's a timely, relevant example (from librul Cali, no less):

In an order issued today, U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria said that the hand-written notes of prosecutors from a 31-year-old murder case “constitute strong evidence that, in prior decades, prosecutors from the [Alameda County District Attorney’s] office were engaged in a pattern of serious misconduct, automatically excluding Jewish and African American jurors in death penalty cases.”

...

The apparent attempts to exclude Black and Jewish people from juries in homicide cases may have been based upon the belief that these groups would be less likely to convict someone if a death sentence was possible. Any exclusion of potential jurors because of their race or religion would have been unconstitutional.

Price said this behavior was not limited to one or two prosecutors but involved “a variety of prosecutors.” Price added that people who were identified in this manner did not end up on juries.


...

Price’s office is reviewing 35 active death penalty cases, and will potentially review matters dating to 1977. She said the review is starting with death penalty cases but other cases may be implicated.


https://oaklandside.org/2024/04/22/alameda-county-prosecutors-allegedly-excluded-black-people-and-jews-from-death-penalty-juries/
Are you actually trying to convey that striking a potential juror based on race is evidence of institutional racism? Seriously?

Because, I realize that I have brain damage and am very likely misunderstanding this. I actually hope that I am misunderstanding this and that I am the dumbass in this case. It certainly wouldn’t be the first time.

But if I am not mistaken and you actually are using this as evidence of institutional racism, you are the one with major problems. I mean as in, you should be disbarred for being a fucking idiot kind of problems.

If it’s the case, I would beat your ass so bad in a court case it would look like Snags vs Matlock. And I’d be Matlock.

You’d need that fat ass NY D.A. Bragg as the judge to have a shot.

That’s so fucking stupid that it actually doesn’t deserve a response. And I really have always thought you were fairly book smart and stuff. But, now? Fuck man.

Have you ever been checked for an aneurysm?
13
The SGA / Re: What would it take?
« Last post by WiregrassTiger on April 25, 2024, 01:05:01 PM »
Only one word in that entire diversion from the truths beating Wes in the face…
:pearl: :monkey: :monkey: :monkey: :monkey: :pb: :pb: :sadm:

I came in to put the emoji of the guy being beaten in the face with dicks because it is one of my favorites. Not because I like being beaten in the face with dicks, motherfucker. GFY.

But it’s gone. I think it would have been great in response to this post as Wes really does like it.

I guess it’s one more thing the weird guy who used to run this place did before he bought the farm. He was a true motherfucker. And he fucked this place entirely up before departing. Piss on his grave.
14
Broun Hall / Re: Stolen but worth examining: Movies It Is Okay To Cry Over
« Last post by CCTAU on April 25, 2024, 12:23:51 PM »
I can’t believe the old standard wasn't pulled out for this: Old Yeller.

And if you didn’t cry when Harry Stamper told his little girl goodbye, you’re a commie bastage!
15
War Damn Eagle / Re: Portal Time Again
« Last post by Snaggletiger on April 25, 2024, 11:12:58 AM »
I love our local Bammer sports talk show.  ARN Alabama Radio Network

Their take this morning.  Lambert-Smith only had 2 catches in his last 4 games.  Something was wrong there. Maybe he's the problem.  I guess we'll find out.

Alabama center, Brockemeyer, leaving.  There's a ton of centers in the portal and every one of them would walk barefoot over hot coals to play for the Tide.
16
War Damn Eagle / Re: Portal Time Again
« Last post by Buzz Killington on April 25, 2024, 11:06:58 AM »
Tyler Scott pulls the jake brake and is staying with AU...
All brakes, no gas?
17
Broun Hall / Re: Stolen but worth examining: Movies It Is Okay To Cry Over
« Last post by Snaggletiger on April 25, 2024, 11:04:57 AM »
Passion of the Christ is a different animal.  That was pain.  I watched it once and it hurt so much I haven’t been able to do it again. 

Little mermaid is just me and my own daughters.  Knowing you have to let them go. 

I can get a little dusty at the end of Planes, Trains, and Automobiles too.  And sometimes at the end of Christmas Vacation when Clark says he did it.  Because my family stuff is always wrecked too and I’d like to have that finish.

Every time you go away.
18
War Damn Eagle / Re: Portal Time Again
« Last post by CCTAU on April 25, 2024, 10:39:28 AM »
Tyler Scott pulls the jake brake and is staying with AU...

He just wanted to get rid of Hood?
19
The SGA / Re: What would it take?
« Last post by Kaos on April 25, 2024, 10:37:39 AM »
Here's a timely, relevant example (from librul Cali, no less):

In an order issued today, U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria said that the hand-written notes of prosecutors from a 31-year-old murder case “constitute strong evidence that, in prior decades, prosecutors from the [Alameda County District Attorney’s] office were engaged in a pattern of serious misconduct, automatically excluding Jewish and African American jurors in death penalty cases.”

...

The apparent attempts to exclude Black and Jewish people from juries in homicide cases may have been based upon the belief that these groups would be less likely to convict someone if a death sentence was possible. Any exclusion of potential jurors because of their race or religion would have been unconstitutional.

Price said this behavior was not limited to one or two prosecutors but involved “a variety of prosecutors.” Price added that people who were identified in this manner did not end up on juries.


...

Price’s office is reviewing 35 active death penalty cases, and will potentially review matters dating to 1977. She said the review is starting with death penalty cases but other cases may be implicated.


https://oaklandside.org/2024/04/22/alameda-county-prosecutors-allegedly-excluded-black-people-and-jews-from-death-penalty-juries/

Only one word in that entire diversion from the truths beating Wes in the face has any significance.  The word “may”

“Apparent” attempt “may”.   

Like every other liberal babbling point where feelings take precedence and facts are manipulated to fit a feeling-based narrative. 

Garbage. 

And also not germane to any rational discussion. 
20
The SGA / Re: What would it take?
« Last post by CCTAU on April 25, 2024, 10:30:18 AM »
Here's a timely, relevant example (from librul Cali, no less):

In an order issued today, U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria said that the hand-written notes of prosecutors from a 31-year-old murder case “constitute strong evidence that, in prior decades, prosecutors from the [Alameda County District Attorney’s] office were engaged in a pattern of serious misconduct, automatically excluding Jewish and African American jurors in death penalty cases.”

...

The apparent attempts to exclude Black and Jewish people from juries in homicide cases may have been based upon the belief that these groups would be less likely to convict someone if a death sentence was possible. Any exclusion of potential jurors because of their race or religion would have been unconstitutional.

Price said this behavior was not limited to one or two prosecutors but involved “a variety of prosecutors.” Price added that people who were identified in this manner did not end up on juries.


...

Price’s office is reviewing 35 active death penalty cases, and will potentially review matters dating to 1977. She said the review is starting with death penalty cases but other cases may be implicated.


https://oaklandside.org/2024/04/22/alameda-county-prosecutors-allegedly-excluded-black-people-and-jews-from-death-penalty-juries/

Wait. So we care about Jews NOW?

I thought the voir dire process allowed each side a set number of strikes with no explanation?

And these notes don't sound like they targeting anyone "JUST BECAUSE":

One undated note referred to a potential juror as a “short, fat, troll.” Another describing a prospective Black female juror reads, “says race no issue but I don’t believe her.”

That would be like us looking at you and saying, "Says he can be impartial about Trump, but I don't believe him."

Maybe there was an issue. Maybe there wasn't. But doesn't the prosecutors get a chance to try and choose the jury they think will help them best? Same as the defense?

Not anywhere near the evidence of systemic racism you think it is in current society. 30 years was a long time ago.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10