Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

The Library => The SGA => Topic started by: Vladimir on November 14, 2017, 02:30:10 PM

Title: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: Vladimir on November 14, 2017, 02:30:10 PM
Serious inquires only, please.
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: The Prowler on November 14, 2017, 04:36:46 PM
As of right now, we have 4 people here riding with a known Pedophile.
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: Buzz Killington on November 14, 2017, 04:38:55 PM
As of right now, we have 4 people here riding with a known Pedophile.
I have not seen anybody throw their support behind Bill Clinton yet.
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: Kaos on November 14, 2017, 04:56:08 PM
As of right now, we have 4 people here riding with a known Pedophile.

No. Read it again. Nobody is riding with you. 
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: The Prowler on November 14, 2017, 05:09:27 PM
Again, Roy Moore is a known Pedophile and atleast 4 on this message board are riding with him.
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: Kaos on November 14, 2017, 05:22:43 PM
Again, Roy Moore is a known Pedophile and atleast 4 on this message board are riding with him.

I was told you finger banged a gecko.  I have in my possession a 1990 high school annual signed by you with the inscription “fuck that lizard.” 

You are a geckofile.  Nasty bastard. 
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: chinook on November 14, 2017, 05:54:33 PM
I was told you finger banged a gecko.  I have in my possession a 1990 high school annual signed by you with the inscription “fuck that lizard.” 

You are a geckofile.  Nasty bastard.

yes, but he saved 15 percent on his automobile insurance. 
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: CCTAU on November 14, 2017, 09:26:45 PM
Again, Roy Moore is a known Pedophile and atleast 4 on this message board are riding with him.


"Known"?


Of course you side with guilty until proven innocent!


You asshats need to learn to be more "consistent" like jizzy!
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: AUTiger1 on November 14, 2017, 11:39:36 PM
After Chowler and Chizzy has said guilty until proven innocent, instead of innocent until proven guilty....I'm voting Roy.


Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: AUChizad on November 15, 2017, 11:03:21 AM
Same with Hillary Clinton, right guys? She hasn't been indicted for anything. She's clean as a whistle. Weird that you didn't vote for her to prove the haters accusing her of things that were never proven wrong!!!

It's almost like you lack moral principles and are complete hypocrites who will stoop to literally defending and making excuses child molesters if they have the right letter in parentheses behind their names.

Have fun embarrassing Alabama.
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: Kaos on November 15, 2017, 11:22:59 AM
Same with Hillary Clinton, right guys? She hasn't been indicted for anything. She's clean as a whistle. Weird that you didn't vote for her to prove the haters accusing her of things that were never proven wrong!!!

It's almost like you lack moral principles and are complete hypocrites who will stoop to literally defending and making excuses child molesters if they have the right letter in parentheses behind their names.

Have fun embarrassing Alabama.

How can you -- someone I consider relatively intelligent -- be this blazingly befuddled?

Hillary lied under oath. 
She lied about Benghazi.  There is actual evidence there.  Not some 60-year old caterwauling whore.

She lied about the contributions to her foundation and campaign.  Actual evidence exists, not Gloria Allredass.

She lied about the servers, lied about what was on them.  Evidence proves this.  Not some faded, innocuous inscription in a 40-year old annual.

She led the personal attacks on Bill's accusers.  Good for her.  Except he did it.  DNA, bitch.

She lied about Whitewater.  Evidence.

She strongarmed the Democratic party and stole the nomination from Bernie.  Evidence, dammit.


There's a VAST difference between the mounds of evidence that points to her complete and total corruption and the tongue wagging of a handful of hillbilly whores from a town in Alabama.

This is simply a matter of you being offended by a person's religious views.  And you live in Louisiana so it's none of your business anyway.  I'll vote for Roy and think of you when I do.  I win again.
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: WiregrassTiger on November 15, 2017, 12:20:03 PM
How can you -- someone I consider relatively intelligent -- be this blazingly befuddled?

Hillary lied under oath. 
She lied about Benghazi.  There is actual evidence there.  Not some 60-year old caterwauling whore.

She lied about the contributions to her foundation and campaign.  Actual evidence exists, not Gloria Allredass.

She lied about the servers, lied about what was on them.  Evidence proves this.  Not some faded, innocuous inscription in a 40-year old annual.

She led the personal attacks on Bill's accusers.  Good for her.  Except he did it.  DNA, bitch.

She lied about Whitewater.  Evidence.

She strongarmed the Democratic party and stole the nomination from Bernie.  Evidence, dammit.


There's a VAST difference between the mounds of evidence that points to her complete and total corruption and the tongue wagging of a handful of hillbilly whores from a town in Alabama.

This is simply a matter of you being offended by a person's religious views.  And you live in Louisiana so it's none of your business anyway.  I'll vote for Roy and think of you when I do.  I win again.
The most concerning thing to me is that you consider Chizzy “relatively intelligent”.

Do you really feel this way or are you just trying to be nice?
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: dallaswareagle on November 15, 2017, 01:08:38 PM
Again, Roy Moore is a known Pedophile and atleast 4 on this message board are riding with him.
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: Kaos on November 15, 2017, 01:18:37 PM


Dude, if Malzahn stepped up his game as much as you have the last year?  This state would be checking Saban’s hotseat, melting his statue down to make shoehorns, ripping down all the Bryant street signs, renaming all the schools named Bryant and carving a likeness of Gus in the side of Red Mountain.
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: AUChizad on November 16, 2017, 10:18:07 AM
I'll bet more than a few of you fell for this #FakeNews.

https://youtu.be/tb3ZL0-qkng

Bernie Bernstein? A Yankee Joo!?!?
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: Kaos on November 16, 2017, 10:25:15 AM
I'll bet more than a few of you fell for this #FakeNews.

https://youtu.be/tb3ZL0-qkng

Bernie Bernstein? A Yankee Joo!?!?

This is your worst trait. 

You ascribe positions to others based on your own biases, neuroses, hangups and proclivities.  You assume up front that you know how others think, feel, react, believe and then rage non-stop based on those (often hilariously incorrect) assumptions.

You make the mistake of thinking that you are the sole arbiter of logic and sanity and that anyone who doesn't believe the way you do is inferior, less urbane, less cultured, less able to think etc. 

You.  And Hitler. 
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: AUChizad on November 16, 2017, 10:36:03 AM
This is your worst trait. 

You ascribe positions to others based on your own biases, neuroses, hangups and proclivities.  You assume up front that you know how others think, feel, react, believe and then rage non-stop based on those (often hilariously incorrect) assumptions.

You make the mistake of thinking that you are the sole arbiter of logic and sanity and that anyone who doesn't believe the way you do is inferior, less urbane, less cultured, less able to think etc. 

You.  And Hitler.
Me?

Clearly, a Moore operative thinks Alabamians are susceptible to this kind of manipulation. Clearly, they thought it was worthwhile to plant these fake robocalls to elicit the exact type of responses about DIRTY LAMESTREAM MEDIA that you've already espoused in this discussion. Making the fake guy sound like a bad Woody Allen impression and naming him Bernie Bernstein would have been less subtle if they would have just called him Jewy McJewberg.

How many Alabamians do YOU think believed it was real? You haven't even explicitly stated, but do YOU think it was real?
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: WiregrassTiger on November 16, 2017, 10:39:04 AM
This is your worst trait. 

You ascribe positions to others based on your own biases, neuroses, hangups and proclivities.  You assume up front that you know how others think, feel, react, believe and then rage non-stop based on those (often hilariously incorrect) assumptions.

You make the mistake of thinking that you are the sole arbiter of logic and sanity and that anyone who doesn't believe the way you do is inferior, less urbane, less cultured, less able to think etc. 

You.  And Hitler.
Not to mention his homosexuality. And racism.
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: Buzz Killington on November 16, 2017, 10:43:40 AM
I'll bet more than a few of you fell for this #FakeNews.

https://youtu.be/tb3ZL0-qkng

Bernie Bernstein? A Yankee Joo!?!?
I told him about that time at summer camp when Mary Jane Simetski grabbed my crotch.  I expect to get a huge check any day now.
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: Kaos on November 16, 2017, 10:52:19 AM
Me?

Clearly, a Moore operative thinks Alabamians are susceptible to this kind of manipulation. Clearly, they thought it was worthwhile to plant these fake robocalls to elicit the exact type of responses about DIRTY LAMESTREAM MEDIA that you've already espoused in this discussion. Making the fake guy sound like a bad Woody Allen impression and naming him Bernie Bernstein would have been less subtle if they would have just called him Jewy McJewberg.

How many Alabamians do YOU think believed it was real? You haven't even explicitly stated, but do YOU think it was real?

Clearly a Moore operative?  Please prove this. 

I don't even know what it is (nor do I care).   I hang up on all robocalls. None of them are real.

My takes on mainstream media are always correct. 

My issue with your response is the overtly arrogant "I bet more than a few of you fell for..."

Riiiiight.  I did that right after I sent this month's installment to Nigeria.  Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to let "Abe from the Internet Company" install some software on my computer remotely so I can be protected.  He's on the line waiting for me now.
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: AUChizad on November 16, 2017, 11:46:43 AM
Clearly a Moore operative?  Please prove this. 
Who do YOU think did this?

Some random person with no affiliation whatsoever with either party in the election?
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: Kaos on November 16, 2017, 12:01:46 PM
Who do YOU think did this?

Some random person with no affiliation whatsoever with either party in the election?

You stated it was “clear” without any credible information as to the source. Who I think did it (not Roy’s campaign) doesn’t matter. 

You are the one speaking in frenzied absolutes. 

For the record?  This is ONE call. No evidence anyone else received one, no evidence it was a “robo call”’.

For all you know this was one guy getting his prank on. 

Shit, Chizad, I used to prank call preachers when I was like 12 or 13 to ask them if the Pope shit in the woods.  I don’t know why.  We just thought it was funny because Steve Martin said it. I’m hoping the Vatican will come out any day now and issue a statement that it did not use phone surveys in the 70s to gather information on papal excretory habits. 
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: WiregrassTiger on November 16, 2017, 12:11:19 PM
You stated it was “clear” without any credible information as to the source. Who I think did it (not Roy’s campaign) doesn’t matter. 

You are the one speaking in frenzied absolutes.
Look, he’s a little uptight over this senate campaign. And some of you people act as if you don’t even care.

Don’t get pissed at me when somebody triggers Chizzy, Wes and Prowler and one or all of them end up whipping somebody’s ass at the iron bowl.

Can’t say WT didn’t warn you.
Title: Re: Roy Moore vs AUChizad
Post by: Vladimir on November 16, 2017, 12:23:40 PM
Look, he’s a little uptight over this senate campaign. And some of you people act as if you don’t even care.

Don’t get pissed at me when somebody triggers Chizzy, Wes and Prowler and one or all of them end up whipping somebody’s ass at the iron bowl.

Can’t say WT didn’t warn you.
Would be overhand slap fight, no?