Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

The Library => The SGA => Topic started by: Kaos on January 28, 2018, 10:11:11 PM

Title: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Kaos on January 28, 2018, 10:11:11 PM
So, this child in Florida was diagnosed with "gender dysphoria" at age fucking FOUR.  His moronic parents "supported" his female gender identity and started treating him like a girl by age 5.  The parents have allowed the kid to have hormone treatments so it gets boobs, but it's still got a wanker swinging in the fruity looms.  Hasn't had that cut off, but the parents are all for it.

Now that it's finally beginning to hit puberty, the thing realizes it is actually attracted to girls. 

 :facepalm:

I think the parents should be gassed and then baked in an easy bake oven. 
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Snaggletiger on January 28, 2018, 11:13:37 PM
 A Fucking Men/Women.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: The Prowler on January 29, 2018, 12:30:10 AM
So, this child in Florida was diagnosed with "gender dysphoria" at age fucking FOUR.  His moronic parents "supported" his female gender identity and started treating him like a girl by age 5.  The parents have allowed the kid to have hormone treatments so it gets boobs, but it's still got a wanker swinging in the fruity looms.  Hasn't had that cut off, but the parents are all for it.

Now that it's finally beginning to hit puberty, the thing realizes it is actually attracted to girls. 

 :facepalm:

I think the parents should be gassed and then baked in an easy bake oven.
^^^^
(http://i.imgur.com/E6FD2ni.gif)
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: wesfau2 on January 29, 2018, 08:12:46 AM
Gender selection (and hormone therapy) at that young age is problematic.

That said, I don't see the contradiction here.  If the kid feels she's a girl/woman then she's not automatically disqualified from an attraction to women.

Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Kaos on January 29, 2018, 08:18:30 AM
Gender selection (and hormone therapy) at that young age is problematic.

That said, I don't see the contradiction here.  If the kid feels she's a girl/woman then she's not automatically disqualified from an attraction to women.

Insanity. 

Hey, let's cut my whooner off, build me a sleestack, grow me some boobs so I can be a "woman" so I can be a lesbian. 

I'm sorry, but that's the sort of idiotic thinking that should be eradicated. 
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: wesfau2 on January 29, 2018, 09:00:42 AM
Insanity. 

Hey, let's cut my whooner off, build me a sleestack, grow me some boobs so I can be a "woman" so I can be a lesbian. 

I'm sorry, but that's the sort of idiotic thinking that should be eradicated.

Thanks for letting the world know how it should be living so as to cause as little discomfort to Kaos as possible.  Shall we adjust our broadcast schedule to only show Andy and Bea?
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Kaos on January 29, 2018, 09:18:29 AM
Thanks for letting the world know how it should be living so as to cause as little discomfort to Kaos as possible.  Shall we adjust our broadcast schedule to only show Andy and Bea?

No.  Not Bea.  I don’t like that sow.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Buzz Killington on January 29, 2018, 09:38:21 AM
Thanks for letting the world know how it should be living so as to cause as little discomfort to Kaos as possible.  Shall we adjust our broadcast schedule to only show Andy and Bea?
You really should run everything through Checkpoint Chickie.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Token on January 29, 2018, 09:49:54 AM
Regardless of what the person is attracted to now, a 4 year old child doesn't know shit about shit.  Those parents should be shot in the face for allowing that bullshit to happen and so should any medical personnel who went along with it. 

I think 13 is too young for a child to decide that for him/her self but at least by that age they know what makes their crotch tingle.  A 4 year old child is a damn toddler.  Jesus Christ.  In 2005 my 4 year old child identified with clifford the big red dog.  Because he was a fucking 4 year old and thought it was entertaining. 

Jesus people are stupid beyond belief.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Buzz Killington on January 29, 2018, 09:58:39 AM
Regardless of what the person is attracted to now, a 4 year old child doesn't know shoot about shoot.  Those parents should be shot in the face for allowing that bullshoot to happen and so should any medical personnel who went along with it. 

I think 13 is too young for a child to decide that for him/her self but at least by that age they know what makes their crotch tingle.  A 4 year old child is a damn toddler.  Jesus Christ.  In 2005 my 4 year old child identified with clifford the big red dog. Because he was a fudgeing 4 year old and thought it was entertaining. 

Jesus people are stupid beyond belief.
Then why didn't you let Zhe get a tail?  People these days.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: AUChizad on January 29, 2018, 10:49:02 AM
You have to be 18 to get a tattoo. Afterall, before that you're not old enough to make permanent alterations to your body that you may later regret.

Give a four month old a pussy if he thinks he wants to grow up to be a woman though. What could go wrong?

A slightly different side of the coin Wes was speaking to. Not only could the kid completely grow out of whatever "phase" makes him think he should be a girl, maybe if he plays with dolls and prefers to wear pink tutus and shit, maybe he's just gay? Or even just an effeminate man? Is there no room for that anymore? I don't understand why these parents think they immediately have to jump to such a radical conclusion at such a young age.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: GH2001 on January 29, 2018, 10:57:55 AM
You really should run everything through Checkpoint Chickie.

You give em 30 they'll take 35.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Kaos on January 29, 2018, 01:03:38 PM
You have to be 18 to get a tattoo. Afterall, before that you're not old enough to make permanent alterations to your body that you may later regret.

Give a four month old a pussy if he thinks he wants to grow up to be a woman though. What could go wrong?

A slightly different side of the coin Wes was speaking to. Not only could the kid completely grow out of whatever "phase" makes him think he should be a girl, maybe if he plays with dolls and prefers to wear pink tutus and shit, maybe he's just gay? Or even just an effeminate man? Is there no room for that anymore? I don't understand why these parents think they immediately have to jump to such a radical conclusion at such a young age.

I find myself siding with you more and more often. The hell is going on?
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: CCTAU on January 29, 2018, 01:18:00 PM
I find myself siding with you more and more often. The hell is going on?

Our baby liberal is growing up?
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: GH2001 on January 29, 2018, 01:28:01 PM
Our baby liberal is growing up?

He's a millennial.

But not sure he's ever been a liberal.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: AUChizad on January 29, 2018, 01:29:50 PM
Climate change is still real, pot is still relatively harmless and should be legal, I still have no issue with gays, Roy Moore is still a scumbag piece of shit, and Trump is still a buffoon.

And my stance on this topic hasn't changed either.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: AUChizad on January 29, 2018, 01:30:40 PM
He's a millennial.

But not sure he's ever been a liberal.
I am a liberal. I'm not a leftist or a Democrat or a progressive.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Buzz Killington on January 29, 2018, 01:36:11 PM
Why do you hate Flo so much?
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Kaos on January 29, 2018, 01:51:30 PM
Climate change is still real, pot is still relatively harmless and should be legal, I still have no issue with gays, Roy Moore is still a scumbag piece of shit, and Trump is still a buffoon.

And my stance on this topic hasn't changed either.

Climate change exists. We didn’t cause it.

Weed is relatively harmless. Less so than alcohol most likely.

Roy Moore is cheesy.  He was wrong for this state. But neither Luther nor Doug were any better. Big Lute is corrupt to the core.  Jones is a leftist wolf pretending to be a sheep. Roy was excluded based on 40 year old trumped up bullshit.  Not because of how he might have performed but on some mob-based hysteria (and double standard). He wouldn’t have been my first, second or third choice.  Jones wasn’t in my top 20. I felt and still feel that Roy was wrongfully crucified. 

Trump?  He could use some edge polishing.  The kick ass results are pretty much what I expected and hoped for. You can’t deny the clear and pervasive positives in everything that matters. Well, you could but that would make you look petty.  As successful as his first year had been can you imagine how much more we could have accomplished without fools like McCain and obstructionist assholes like Schumer and pelosi standing in the way?
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: GH2001 on January 29, 2018, 02:08:24 PM
I am a liberal. I'm not a leftist or a Democrat or a progressive.

Not to get into semantics but in today's political climate those are all pretty much the same policy wise.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: AUChizad on January 29, 2018, 02:17:43 PM
Not to get into semantics but in today's political climate those are all pretty much the same policy wise.
It's a distinction that matters to me. Especially in a discussion about pinning down my ideology.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: wesfau2 on January 29, 2018, 02:18:08 PM
Not to get into semantics but in today's political climate those are all pretty much the same policy wise.

Nooooope.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: CCTAU on January 29, 2018, 02:50:32 PM
Not to get into semantics but in today's political climate those are all pretty much the same policy wise.


Yeeeepp!
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Kaos on January 29, 2018, 03:03:06 PM
It's a distinction that matters to me. Especially in a discussion about pinning down my ideology.

You aren’t consistently dumb enough to truly qualify as a liberal democrat.

There are areas where you lean left of center.  But you’re smart enough to see that true socialism is a failed philosophy. You get the value of a capital economy.  You’ve got undeserved white guilt BUT that was drummed into you at a much earlier age than it was me.

You’re not a true liberal.  Sorry if that triggers you.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: AUChizad on January 29, 2018, 05:18:22 PM
You aren’t consistently dumb enough to truly qualify as a liberal democrat.

There are areas where you lean left of center.  But you’re smart enough to see that true socialism is a failed philosophy. You get the value of a capital economy.  You’ve got undeserved white guilt BUT that was drummed into you at a much earlier age than it was me.

You’re not a true liberal.  Sorry if that triggers you.
Liberalism, in the classical economic sense, is the opposite of socialism.

Liberalism means favoring individual liberty, being open minded about things and cultures even if they're not your own. Laizzes fair, live and let live, whatever floats your boat.

Not your definition.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Kaos on January 29, 2018, 06:13:46 PM
Liberalism, in the classical economic sense, is the opposite of socialism.

Liberalism means favoring individual liberty, being open minded about things and cultures even if they're not your own. Laizzes fair, live and let live, whatever floats your boat.

Not your definition.

And your definition doesn’t mesh with the national narrative. 

It’s completely different, actually. 

Come up with something else so you stop misidentifying yourself.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Snaggletiger on January 29, 2018, 10:03:02 PM
Climate change is still real, (Yep, always has been since the beginning of time) pot is still relatively harmless and should be legal, (100% agree) I still have no issue with gays, (100% agree) Roy Moore is still a scumbag piece of shit, (100% agree) and Trump is still a buffoon. (On policy, 100% disagree.  On the Twatter and thin-skinned responses to any and all criticizim, 100% agree.))

And my stance on this topic hasn't changed either.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: GH2001 on January 30, 2018, 10:42:35 AM
Liberalism, in the classical economic sense, is the opposite of socialism.

Liberalism means favoring individual liberty, being open minded about things and cultures even if they're not your own. Laizzes fair, live and let live, whatever floats your boat.

Not your definition.

Classic liberalism yes. You are correct.

That's just not what it means today politically. Not totally anyway. Classic liberalism is what we know now as libertarians.

And no wes in today's climate they are no different. Other than the occasional joe manchin/joe lieberman types. And dare I say it, Doug jones. Liberals and progressives are used interchangeably to describe someone who sits on the left end of the spectrum. Most democrats fit this bill now. 20 years ago? No but today yes. Without blatant cheating, a far left loon would have been the democrat nominee.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: CCTAU on January 30, 2018, 10:59:43 AM
Classic liberalism yes. You are correct.

That's just not what it means today politically. Not totally anyway. Classic liberalism is what we know now as libertarians.

And no wes in today's climate they are no different. Other than the occasional joe manchin/joe lieberman types. And dare I say it, Doug jones. Liberals and progressives are used interchangeably to describe someone who sits on the left end of the spectrum. Most democrats fit this bill now. 20 years ago? No but today yes. Without blatant cheating, a far left loon would have been the democrat nominee.

Wait. you mean its OK to redefine something like "white nationalism" but not liberalism. Gasp!
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Kaos on January 30, 2018, 11:03:08 AM
Wait. you mean its OK to redefine something like "white nationalism" but not liberalism. Gasp!

BAD Whitey! 
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: wesfau2 on January 30, 2018, 04:42:10 PM
Wait. you mean its OK to redefine something like "white nationalism" but not liberalism. Gasp!

Is this really the position you want to argue?
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Kaos on January 30, 2018, 05:01:11 PM
Is this really the position you want to argue?

Can I count on your support in 2028?
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: wesfau2 on January 30, 2018, 05:17:16 PM
Can I count on your support in 2028?

Probably not, but I may have gone totally batshit insane by then so...who knows?
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: chinook on January 30, 2018, 05:26:38 PM
Probably not, but I may have gone totally batshit insane by then so...who knows?

Bo?
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: wesfau2 on January 30, 2018, 05:29:41 PM
Bo?

He ain't sayin.
Title: Re: No, you are NOT Jazz
Post by: Kaos on January 30, 2018, 08:52:50 PM
Probably not, but I may have gone totally batshit insane by then so...who knows?

I’ll take that as a yes.  I’m building bridges.