Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports
Pat Dye Field => Signing Day => Topic started by: jadennis on January 19, 2010, 02:30:31 PM
-
Rumor is Eric Mack canceled his visit to Auburn? Skreets, skreets?
-
Rumor is Eric Mack canceled his visit to Auburn? Skreets, skreets?
True. According to Scout and Rivals.
-
Last I heard is that he would be visiting Auburn with a JR HS teammate during Junior Day at Auburn.
-
Excuse my sudden surge of stupidity, but who is Eric Mack?
-
Excuse my sudden surge of stupidity, but who is Eric Mack?
OL from SC.
-
But, the skreets said he should be visiting this weekend.
<Insert comment from Prowler saying "Yeah I never said he was absolutely going to, I just said he should!" here.>
The problem with Prowler is he never takes a stand. He talks out of both sides of his mouth so he can ultimately be "right" in his own mind, regardless of what happens.
-
But, the skreets said he should be visiting this weekend.
<Insert comment from Prowler saying "Yeah I never said he was absolutely going to, I just said he should!" here.>
The problem with Prowler is he never takes a stand. He talks out of both sides of his mouth so he can ultimately be "right" in his own mind, regardless of what happens.
It's a win win situation baby!
-
It's got french benefits.
-
But, the skreets said he should be visiting this weekend.
<Insert comment from Prowler saying "Yeah I never said he was absolutely going to, I just said he should!" here.>
The problem with Prowler is he never takes a stand. He talks out of both sides of his mouth so he can ultimately be "right" in his own mind, regardless of what happens.
Wow...you actually made yourself look retarded.
Should I set you straight, or should I just let it go to save yourself the embarASSment?
I think I'll set you straight:
Here was first post that I made about Eric Mack and his visit to Auburn.....
Calhoun County OL Eric Mack, who said after his official visit to USC Sunday he was firm with the Gamecocks and would not take any more visits, does plan to take an unofficial visit to Auburn next weekend with teammate ATH Shamier Jeffery who is going there for a junior day. Mack, who has been hotly pursued by the Tigers, made an official visit there in September. Mack has scratched his plans for an official visit to Florida.
That was a blog or whatever written by Mr. Kornhole a USCe writer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here was the second post that I made about Eric Mack and his visit to Auburn.....
One thing is for sure...If Eric Mack does come to Auburn on an unofficial with his friend for Junior Days or sometime before NSD, then Auburn will more than likely land him. If he decides not to...then that's a pretty good sign, he'll be inking with USCe. But, the Auburn Coaches will still be visiting him with their in-home visit...so, he could still be a possibility. I said this two years ago....those that have a weak heart, or just weak minded (kaos), should just step away from the recruiting talk until Feb. 4th, because this is the time of year that the Recruiting Season gets crazy and it will, more than likely, be all over the place.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here was my third post that I made about Eric Mack and his visit to Auburn.......
No, I don't just "wildly speculate" about recruiting. Plus the Auburn coaches will still have an inhome visit with him, so even if he doesn't make it down this weekend....it won't be over, until he signs ("I don't know what the word 'No' means" - Coach Troop regarding recruiting). Buy, hey...keep trying kaos, you'll get it one day :thumbsup:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here was my fourth post that I made about Eric Mack and his visit to Auburn, it was a response to Jumbo saying that he skipped over most of DJSimp's post about Eric Mack and his reported visit to Auburn.....
In layman's terms...Da Skreets are Legit. Also, Eric Mack should be coming in this weekend.
Never did I state that he would DEFINITELY be coming in for a visit to Auburn....I stated should he, Auburn would, more than likely, land him....
I'm not sure why you felt the need to say that I would try spinning it....It isn't spinning when someone can provide facts behind what they said or didn't say. What you or others take from what I or others say, is your problem.
-
Irony. It's a bitch.
-
Irony. It's a bitch.
I usually don't iron anything anymore...I just take a damp towel, throw the clothes that I was thinking about ironing into the dryer with the towel, then I dry it for about 10 minutes.
-
I tried to give warnings for those doubters to reconcile, but phuk it they wouldnt listen.
-
Wow...you actually made yourself look retarded.
Should I set you straight, or should I just let it go to save yourself the embarASSment?
I think I'll set you straight:
Here was first post that I made about Eric Mack and his visit to Auburn.....
That was a blog or whatever written by Mr. Kornhole a USCe writer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here was the second post that I made about Eric Mack and his visit to Auburn.....
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here was my third post that I made about Eric Mack and his visit to Auburn.......
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here was my fourth post that I made about Eric Mack and his visit to Auburn, it was a response to Jumbo saying that he skipped over most of DJSimp's post about Eric Mack and his reported visit to Auburn.....
Never did I state that he would DEFINITELY be coming in for a visit to Auburn....I stated should he, Auburn would, more than likely, land him....
I'm not sure why you felt the need to say that I would try spinning it....It isn't spinning when someone can provide facts behind what they said or didn't say. What you or others take from what I or others say, is your problem.
Right on time. I almost could have predicted this response, word for word.
-
Right on time. I almost could have predicted this response, word for word.
So could everyone else.....because it was there for everyone to see. You were the retarded 5 1/2 year old that made the statement about me.
-
So could everyone else.....because it was there for everyone to see. You were the retarded 5 1/2 year old that made the statement about me.
Please, for God's sake, stop making it easy for them, dude. Seriously.
-
Please, for God's sake, stop making it easy for them, dude. Seriously.
Seriously. dude. stop making it easy for me to keep bashing you on every topic about recruiting.
-
Prowler...for the record, I like the info you post, simply because I like reading about what may or may not be going on with recruits.
But, I feel that the stuff you just posted (your old posts) about Eric Mack are kind of exactly what Kaos gives you a hard time about.
You see, you said Mack is likely going to visit AU before NSD, and if he does, then mostly likely that means AU lands him. If he doesn't, then that is a pretty good sign that he signs with SC.
Then you said that the AU coaches are still going to visit him, so he's still a possibility even if he doesn't visit.
Then you said even if he doesn't make it down it's not over until he signs.
Don't you see what you did? You started with a theory that went like this: if he visits AU, he likely to sign with us. And if he doesn't, he is likely to sign with SC.
But then you followed it with: but if it doesn't turn out that way, he could still be a possibility.
And finally with: it isn't over until he signs.
So what you did was pitch a guess, then follow it with all other possibilities that cover any scenario in which he signs with us or doesn't.
As it turns out, looks like we will land him, even though he didn't visit and even before the in-home visit. So the only thing you got right was "it isn't over until he signs"....which pretty much goes for every recruit there is.
I'm not saying you're wrong on things, per se, but that you did kind of do an all encompassing string of comments that almost any scenario would fit into.
See, had you stuck with only the original statement about him visiting = AU landing him, and him not visiting = him staying with SC, it would have turned out that you were wrong. But since you added all the vague "catch all" follow ups, you can say you told us all along that it was a possibility....which we all knew.
-
I like reading about what may or may not be going on with recruits.
But, I feel that the stuff you just posted (your old posts) about Eric Mack are kind of exactly what Kaos gives you a hard time about.
You see, you said Mack is likely going to visit AU before NSD, and if he does, then mostly likely that means AU lands him. If he doesn't, then that is a pretty good sign that he signs with SC.
Then you said that the AU coaches are still going to visit him, so he's still a possibility even if he doesn't visit.
Then you said even if he doesn't make it down it's not over until he signs.
Don't you see what you did? You started with a theory that went like this: if he visits AU, he likely to sign with us. And if he doesn't, he is likely to sign with SC.
But then you followed it with: but if it doesn't turn out that way, he could still be a possibility.
And finally with: it isn't over until he signs.
So what you did was pitch a guess, then follow it with all other possibilities that cover any scenario in which he signs with us or doesn't.
As it turns out, looks like we will land him, even though he didn't visit and even before the in-home visit. So the only thing you got right was "it isn't over until he signs"....which pretty much goes for every recruit there is.
I'm not saying you're wrong on things, per se, but that you did kind of do an all encompassing string of comments that almost any scenario would fit into.
See, had you stuck with only the original statement about him visiting = AU landing him, and him not visiting = him staying with SC, it would have turned out that you were wrong. But since you added all the vague "catch all" follow ups, you can say you told us all along that it was a possibility....which we all knew.
This!!!
-
I believe some people have close ties to recruits and may actually have inside info. I believe so, because I knew Dre K was Bama bound before Jerrell signed with Bama.
Thing is, Prowler's skreets aren't crowded with insiders. No, it's a collection of opinions on some premium website formed by the interviews with recruits. I realize that kids change their minds which sometimes changes information, but Prowler's skreets have an out with every phuking recruit. Seriously, his skreets don't give any information that is 100% soild. It's always "there's a good chance, unless". Holy poop!!! That can be said about every single recruit. They'll sign here, unless they don't.
That's all I've ever tried to say.
At one time, I really thought prowler was simply trying to get a rise out of Kaos. But when questioned, dude seriously gets defensive and starts claiming that his "inside guy" hits him up with text messages.
It doesn't sound like someone just fucking around. No, it sounds like someone who really believes they have an "inside guy".
-
I believe some people have close ties to recruits and may actually have inside info. I believe so, because I knew Dre K was Bama bound before Jerrell signed with Bama.
Thing is, Prowler's skreets aren't crowded with insiders. No, it's a collection of opinions on some premium website formed by the interviews with recruits. I realize that kids change their minds which sometimes changes information, but Prowler's skreets have an out with every phuking recruit. Seriously, his skreets don't give any information that is 100% soild. It's always "there's a good chance, unless". Holy poop!!! That can be said about every single recruit. They'll sign here, unless they don't.
That's all I've ever tried to say.
At one time, I really thought prowler was simply trying to get a rise out of Kaos. But when questioned, dude seriously gets defensive and starts claiming that his "inside guy" hits him up with text messages.
It doesn't sound like someone just fucking around. No, it sounds like someone who really believes they have an "inside guy".
I do have an "inside guy", actually, I have four of them. Two of those are very close to the recruits.
-
I do have an "inside guy", actually, I have four of them. Two of those are very close to the recruits.
(http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/20/281160490921c2b1c98f9cb8914c43db61226fe1.gif) (http://www.threadbombing.com/details.php?image_id=4469)
-
Not saying Prowler does or doesn't have skreets directly. I have no idea. But I do know that if you are making an accusation against him, the burden of proof is on you to prove he doesn't have skreets.
I do know I have a contact or two close to the Athletic Dept. Every now and then I will get some good info (whether true or not) that I like to pass along. If nothing else, its interesting. I think if Prowler is guilty of anything, it may be in how he words his posts, and not so much the intent or the content. I think he means well and most probably get way too worked up over his posts. When you get any kind of heresay or 'skreets' you really just need to take it with a grain of salt. Its called the 'rumor mill' for a reason.
-
(http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/20/281160490921c2b1c98f9cb8914c43db61226fe1.gif) (http://www.threadbombing.com/details.php?image_id=4469)
Matthews, Lee, Murphy, and Marshall?
-
Matthews, Lee, Murphy, and Marshall?
Nope....
BTW, I'm not going to name names, but two are Auburn player's dads. One is a very close friend of a Auburn player and the other is a former player.