Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

The Library => The SGA => Topic started by: AUTailgatingRules on November 09, 2016, 02:38:30 PM

Title: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: AUTailgatingRules on November 09, 2016, 02:38:30 PM
I'll Start with some obvious ones:

Winner:  Sean Hannity
Loser:  Megan Kelly

Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Saniflush on November 09, 2016, 03:04:05 PM
Winner: The naughty thoughts I have about Megan Kelly
Loser: My sore dick
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: dallaswareagle on November 09, 2016, 03:05:29 PM
Winner:  True Americans

Loser:     Hollywood

LoserA:  Country's that the shitbags move too. ( I fully expect them not to leave)
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Kaos on November 09, 2016, 03:15:43 PM
Winner: Me
Loser: The ACLU's gonna stop Trump
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Snaggletiger on November 09, 2016, 03:43:19 PM
Winner: Fox News' giddy election coverage panel

Loser: Whoopi Goldberg said "We can impeach his ass."
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: dallaswareagle on November 09, 2016, 03:57:42 PM
Winner: Fox News' giddy election coverage panel

Loser: Whoopi Goldberg said "We can impeach his ass."


Will be hard for her to do from whatever country she moves too. whoever is stupid enough to let her in.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Kaos on November 09, 2016, 04:01:15 PM
Loser: Wolf Blitzer's increasingly panicked pleadings to "find democratic counties where this can be turned.."

Winner: Kellyanne Conway


Loser: Obama's "legacy"

Winner: Saturday Night Live


Loser: Saudi Arabian donors

Winner: Julian Assange
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 09, 2016, 04:13:32 PM
Losers - third party voters.


Winners - silent majority.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: The Prowler on November 09, 2016, 10:52:21 PM
Winners - The Americans that voted their conscience.

Losers - The Americans that party voted.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Kaos on November 09, 2016, 11:09:38 PM
Winners - The Americans that voted their conscience. Trump voters

Losers - The Americans that party voted. Democrats

Glad we can agree.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: The Prowler on November 09, 2016, 11:53:23 PM
Glad we can agree.
If you voted your conscience...you are a winner. If you voted strictly for the Party...you are a loser. That's just my opinion. I really wish I could've seen more of Evan McMullin. Trump is the POTUS and as crazy as this may sound to some here. I don't trash my Commander in Chief. I see no positives in doing so. I just wish a lot of other people would see it the same way. Don't get me wrong, I still don't like him, but I want to see what he does.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: GH2001 on November 10, 2016, 08:07:37 AM
If you voted your conscience...you are a winner. If you voted strictly for the Party...you are a loser. That's just my opinion. I really wish I could've seen more of Evan McMullin. Trump is the POTUS and as crazy as this may sound to some here. I don't trash my Commander in Chief. I see no positives in doing so. I just wish a lot of other people would see it the same way. Don't get me wrong, I still don't like him, but I want to see what he does.

Maybe he should have ran for president during the primaries like everyone else. He's an open borders shitbag. Fuck him and his swooping in at the last second bullshit. Stances like his are horrible for American jobs. Yes it provides cheap fruit pickers but it also takes good jobs away from our workers and lowers wages for the ones here who do have the jobs. It's a fact.

Listen when I tell you this prowler - real talk - he is probably going to benefit workers like you a lot more than workers like me - meaning blue collar/union/manufacturing vs white collar. It's his MO. Which is fine. I want the entire country to do good. It does best when everyone is elevated. We've lost way too many blue collar and manufacturing jobs the last 20 years. We need a lot of those jobs here. And the ones that are here like yours need to stay here.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Kaos on November 10, 2016, 08:15:23 AM
Listen when I tell you this prowler - real talk - he is probably going to benefit workers like you a lot more than workers like me - meaning blue collar/union/manufacturing vs white collar. It's his MO. Which is fine. I want the entire country to do good. It does best when everyone is elevated. We've lost way too many blue collar and manufacturing jobs the last 20 years. We need a lot of those jobs here. And the ones that are here like yours need to stay here.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/CepTYjGRbV1ba/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: GH2001 on November 10, 2016, 08:19:50 AM
Playing the game....



Winners:

The Outsiders - Trump, Bernie, Carson, Cruz, Breitbart

Kellyanne Conway - she has a job in DC wherever she wants now

The American Worker - no matter your beliefs, Hillary is a crony capitalist who favors big banks, uneven free trade and offshoring. Her husband passed nafta and China free trade and its effect has been devestating. She doesn't get to say she's against it now for convenience. The worker won out with her loss.

Mike Pence - love this guy. Class act. Prob helped Trump more than people realize esp in Wisconsin and Penn with his honest, rural, folksy low key approach. Whether you agree with him or not, it's hard not to like him.

Brett Baier - dark horse here but in an election cycle that showed Americas ugly side, Baier was one of only a handful of good journalists. We saw horrible sides of the media from Megan Kelly, to Rachel maddow to all the goons on major network. Baier was an even hand who was objective as it got. I enjoy watching his shows.




Losers:

Media - egg on face. Lots of eggs on faces. Their meltdown is fun to watch even if you dislike trump.

MOST Pollsters and statistical modelers - Nate silver, Larry sabato and others who are usually very good failed epically. Enough to lose credibility for a while. IBD and the la times were the most accurate as they have been the last 3-4 elections. Good for them.

BIG BANKERS and offshoring firms - no more do they have a "mole" in the White House as they have since 1989. Every president since Reagan has allowed these shit bags to run amock. Those days may be over.

ACA - it's all but a formality that it will be scrapped now. As good as that is, it has to be done right as its tentacles reach far already.

Dems in the Senate - this was possibly as big of an upset as trump. But has been overshadowed by trump. The GOP only lost two seats and narrowly missed on one of those with ayotte in nh. Another senate candidate in Colorado also only lost by 2 points. Huge fail for the Dems there. Two weeks ago the Dems taking the senate was more of a sure thing than Hillary.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Kaos on November 10, 2016, 08:33:26 AM
Winner:  Whoever made this:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw0tnfhWIAMYTuk.jpg)

Loser:
The morons who did this:
(https://www.dailywire.com/sites/default/files/uploads/2016/11/cher_tweets.jpg)

(https://pmchollywoodlife.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/hillary-clinton-supporters-cry-tears-rex-lead.jpg?w=600)


Also loser:

Seth Meyers -- You can be conciliatory now, but I'm not about to forget your hateful diatribes.  Fuck you, clowno.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: GH2001 on November 10, 2016, 08:39:46 AM
Who cares what they think? No one.

Also don't care what mainland Europe thinks. F hollande and merkel. No One cares what they think.

The UK has some sense. Brexit was great. It did not tear them apart. Cher needs to get out of Hollywood. I work with the Brits everyday in my job. They were thrilled. Even the ones who weren't for it weren't strongly against it. They were ok with it after. And still are. It was not gloom and doom. F Cher.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 11, 2016, 08:56:31 AM
Winners - The Americans that voted their conscience.

Losers - The Americans that party voted.


You got ZERO electoral votes! Zero. The definition of your existence!
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: War Eagle!!! on November 11, 2016, 09:35:45 AM

You got ZERO electoral votes! Zero. The definition of you existence!

Dude...

If you are going to come on here and gloat, why the fuck do it like this? You are part of the problem. At least Kaos has reasons other than taking personal shots at people. Stop feeding the stereotype...
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Kaos on November 11, 2016, 10:57:20 AM
Dude...

If you are going to come on here and gloat, why the fuck do it like this? You are part of the problem. At least Kaos has reasons other than taking personal shots at people. Stop feeding the stereotype...

I'm only gloating because I was right.  About all of it.  Right about the way the vote would go (based on what I saw in my daughter's classroom as much as anything).  Right about him being the only one who could take down Hillary because he was the ONLY candidate who could connect with the working class in Michigan, PA, Wisconsin.  Right that he could deliver Florida and GA and Arizona when those weren't sure.  Right that the conservative majority was still there and just waiting for somebody, anybody to hear them.  Right that this majority has felt abandoned since GHWB said "read my lips, no new taxes" and then taxed them anyway.  Right that they've been ignoring elections because they've been ignored themselves.   

I saw every bit of it coming.  Yeah, the relentless media battering and the constant ridicule on this board and out in public made me doubt.  Even as i felt in my guts that I was right I started to doubt what I knew.  Same thing with Chizik, by the way.  I knew I was right but got confused by 2010. 

I knew I was right because I was hesitant to admit that I was going to vote for Trump in public. I didn't put signs in my yard like I have in past elections. I didn't volunteer.   I've campaigned for people in the past.  Back when I was fresh out of high school I was a county youth coordinator for George Wallace in his last gubernatorial campaign.  I worked on the Carter campaign when I wasn't even old enough to vote.  I volunteered for Reagan.  I even did a little work for Bill Clinton's second run.  I thought he'd done a fair job (was wrong) and wasn't impressed with Dole.  I volunteered for baby Bush.  I was part of the Rudy G campaign when there was one. I wanted to bed Sarah Palin and stay there for months.  I've always been a political animal. For a long time growing up my only ambition was to be governor.  I actually practiced being political, shaking hands with people, working the crowd.  Until I decided sex and alcohol were pretty important, I went about every day as if I were campaigning. But...   I went to the wrong college because of a girl and because I thought it would give me a political advantage when the time came to run.  Of course I screwed up my life, flunked out because I hated it, etc. and can never be governor now, but still.  I've always been interested in and involved in politics.  I didn't do anything for Trump.  I figure there were lots of folks like me who simply could NOT vote for her but due to the stigma didn't want to announce we were voting for Trump.

Whether you recognize this or not, Chiz, you were stereotypical of that response.  Say you're voting for Trump and it unleashed a lengthy screaming diatribe where you were branded racist, sexist, lycanthropic or castigated for liking the Xena tv show. 

That "how could you be so stupid" reaction only reinforced my determination to vote for Trump.  Apparently I wasn't alone. 

The protests this week?  The failure to comprehend the very basic reasons for her failure?  The blame being shoved at Gary Johnson, the Electoral College, the stupidity of women, the laziness of minorities, racism, etc.?  That only guarantees that Trump's movement will continue.  It's only going to get stronger.  The minority is the minority for a reason. 

Am I delighted over a Trump presidency?  No.  I wish it were somebody stronger and more polished.  But I'm part of the majority he reached.  From this maybe we can begin to find people who don't cater to the fringes and instead speak to the true, compassionate heart of America. 
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 11, 2016, 03:53:46 PM
Dude...

If you are going to come on here and gloat, why the fuck do it like this? You are part of the problem. At least Kaos has reasons other than taking personal shots at people. Stop feeding the stereotype...
So they got more than zero?


I have always held the belief that a third party vote is wasted. Pointing out that fact is not gloating but enforcing the truth.





Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Ogre on November 11, 2016, 04:54:28 PM
So they got more than zero?


I have always held the belief that a third party vote is wasted. Pointing out that fact is not gloating but enforcing the truth.

"Enforcing the truth."  Give me a break.  Who died and appointed you to the Justice League? 

I voted third party and I'd do it again.  I am entitled to vote the way I choose, and I don't owe you or anyone else an explanation.  It's not like I expected Evan McMullin to pull off some shocking victory on Tuesday.  I voted the way I did because I will always vote for someone who most closely aligned with my values, both fiscally and socially.  He was that guy.  If a true conservative had been the Republican nominee then I would have voted for them. 

As I said, I'm glad Trump won.  I do believe he's infinitely better than Hillary.  I hope he is the best President we've ever had.  I truly mean that.  But no politician is entitled to my vote because they have a (R) behind their name. 

Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: The Prowler on November 11, 2016, 05:26:33 PM
"Enforcing the truth."  Give me a break.  Who died and appointed you to the Justice League? 

I voted third party and I'd do it again.  I am entitled to vote the way I choose, and I don't owe you or anyone else an explanation.  It's not like I expected Evan McMullin to pull off some shocking victory on Tuesday.  I voted the way I did because I will always vote for someone who most closely aligned with my values, both fiscally and socially.  He was that guy.  If a true conservative had been the Republican nominee then I would have voted for them. 

As I said, I'm glad Trump won.  I do believe he's infinitely better than Hillary.  I hope he is the best President we've ever had.  I truly mean that.  But no politician is entitled to my vote because they have a (R) behind their name.
Exactly.

I stand by what I said.

Winner - voted their conscience.

Loser - voted their party even if they didn't like the candidate.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: jmar on November 11, 2016, 06:06:23 PM
So they got more than zero?


I have always held the belief that a third party vote is wasted. Pointing out that fact is not gloating but enforcing the truth.
It is a waste and that doesn't make you any smarter so there is that. Happy Friday!
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: AUTailgatingRules on November 11, 2016, 06:56:19 PM
"Enforcing the truth."  Give me a break.  Who died and appointed you to the Justice League? 

I voted third party and I'd do it again.  I am entitled to vote the way I choose, and I don't owe you or anyone else an explanation.  It's not like I expected Evan McMullin to pull off some shocking victory on Tuesday.  I voted the way I did because I will always vote for someone who most closely aligned with my values, both fiscally and socially.  He was that guy.  If a true conservative had been the Republican nominee then I would have voted for them. 

As I said, I'm glad Trump won.  I do believe he's infinitely better than Hillary.  I hope he is the best President we've ever had.  I truly mean that.  But no politician is entitled to my vote because they have a (R) behind their name.

You know he wants to take government land and give it back to the people to drill baby drill
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Snaggletiger on November 11, 2016, 09:30:44 PM
You guys have some great insight and advice.  But I'm telling you I studied with the Maharishi for many years, and really didn't learn that much. But one thing that he taught me, I'll never forget: 'ALWAYS...' no, wait-- 'NEVER...' no, wait, it was 'ALWAYS carry a litter bag in your car. It doesn't take up much room, and if it gets full, you can toss it out the window."

Peace be with you.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Kaos on November 12, 2016, 02:01:52 AM
You know he wants to take government land and give it back to the people to drill baby drill

I thought we had agreed that drilling babies was wrong. 
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 12, 2016, 03:33:03 AM
It is a waste and that doesn't make you any smarter so there is that. Happy Friday!


All you good ole "good conscience" folks who pissed your vote away (TRUTH), but still ended up with Trump must be a bit perplexed. I mean now you don't get to stand up and thump your chest like you expected.


Bottom line is that the vote was wasted. It doesn't make me smarter to point it out. But it validates exactly what I said from the beginning. Those are the players just "happy to be on the team"! The ones that won't get in the game.


Third party candidates got ZERO EC votes.




There are only a few people on this board who backed the GOP candidate. We knew from the beginning that anything the GOP had was a better choice than hitlary. So we fought for him. Regardless of what was said, we stayed true to the mission, "No Hitlary"!


It doesn't make us smarter. But it does show who will stand up and fight. And who will not.


From the looks of things, we are not alone out there. But in here...



Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Ogre on November 12, 2016, 07:23:30 AM

All you good ole "good conscience" folks who pissed your vote away (TRUTH), but still ended up with Trump must be a bit perplexed. I mean now you don't get to stand up and thump your chest like you expected.


Bottom line is that the vote was wasted. It doesn't make me smarter to point it out. But it validates exactly what I said from the beginning. Those are the players just "happy to be on the team"! The ones that won't get in the game.


Third party candidates got ZERO EC votes.




There are only a few people on this board who backed the GOP candidate. We knew from the beginning that anything the GOP had was a better choice than hitlary. So we fought for him. Regardless of what was said, we stayed true to the mission, "No Hitlary"!


It doesn't make us smarter. But it does show who will stand up and fight. And who will not.


From the looks of things, we are not alone out there. But in here...

Will you stand up and fight if Trump, say, orders the military to commit war crimes?  Will you stand up and fight if he tries to intimidate or threaten the rights of people who disagree with him?  Will you stand up and fight if he usurps his Constitutional powers and starts issuing executive orders that should've been passed through Congress?  Or will it be ok because Obama did it too?

If it comes down to it (and I hope it doesn't), will you fight for Trump or America?   
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: GH2001 on November 12, 2016, 07:24:57 AM
You know he wants to take government land and give it back to the people to drill baby drill

And that's not all. He has some bad bad stances on other things. And was too much of a pussy to run the gauntlet of a primary. At least Gary Johnson did that and was on the ballots. McMullin was nothing but a protest candidate propped up at the last min by never trumpers.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: GH2001 on November 12, 2016, 07:26:20 AM
Will you stand up and fight if Trump, say, orders the military to commit war crimes?  Will you stand up and fight if he tries to intimidate or threaten the rights of people who disagree with him?  Will you stand up and fight if he usurps his Constitutional powers and starts issuing executive orders that should've been passed through Congress?  Or will it be ok because Obama did it too?

If it comes down to it (and I hope it doesn't), will you fight for Trump or America?

Consider for a min that the guy hasn't served one day in office. Consider for a min that candidate trump and president trump may be two different people.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 12, 2016, 07:35:56 AM
Will you stand up and fight if Trump, say, orders the military to commit war crimes?  Will you stand up and fight if he tries to intimidate or threaten the rights of people who disagree with him?  Will you stand up and fight if he usurps his Constitutional powers and starts issuing executive orders that should've been passed through Congress?  Or will it be ok because Obama did it too?

If it comes down to it (and I hope it doesn't), will you fight for Trump or America?


Damn prowler, you know, I just want snort cocaine and rape 12 year olds with him. I don't want commit war crimes!
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Ogre on November 12, 2016, 08:29:56 AM
Consider for a min that the guy hasn't served one day in office. Consider for a min that candidate trump and president trump may be two different people.

I fully expect them to be. But let's not pretend that he didn't mention those scenarios during his campaign. The man has an authoritarian streak in him. None of them are outside the realm of possibility. I just wonder who CCTAU and his ilk would fight for, hypothetically speaking.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: The Prowler on November 12, 2016, 08:42:57 AM

All you good ole "good conscience" folks who pissed your vote away (TRUTH), but still ended up with Trump must be a bit perplexed. I mean now you don't get to stand up and thump your chest like you expected.


Bottom line is that the vote was wasted. It doesn't make me smarter to point it out. But it validates exactly what I said from the beginning. Those are the players just "happy to be on the team"! The ones that won't get in the game.


Third party candidates got ZERO EC votes.




There are only a few people on this board who backed the GOP candidate. We knew from the beginning that anything the GOP had was a better choice than hitlary. So we fought for him. Regardless of what was said, we stayed true to the mission, "No Hitlary"!


It doesn't make us smarter. But it does show who will stand up and fight. And who will not.


From the looks of things, we are not alone out there. But in here...
Ummm, Republican & Democrats candidates got ZERO EC votes too. They received promises. They vote for the President and Vice President separately on Dec. 19th.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 12, 2016, 09:31:40 AM
I fully expect them to be. But let's not pretend that he didn't mention those scenarios during his campaign. The man has an authoritarian streak in him. None of them are outside the realm of possibility. I just wonder who CCTAU and his ilk would fight for, hypothetically speaking.


"Ilk"?
Damn, sucks being lumped into the loser pile with prowler, huh?
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Ogre on November 12, 2016, 10:13:50 AM

"Ilk"?
Damn, sucks being lumped into the loser pile with prowler, huh?

And by avoiding the question twice now I think I have my answer. You are a mirror image of the Obama cultists you've despised for 8 years.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: WiregrassTiger on November 12, 2016, 11:07:27 AM

All you good ole "good conscience" folks who pissed your vote away (TRUTH), but still ended up with Trump must be a bit perplexed. I mean now you don't get to stand up and thump your chest like you expected.


Bottom line is that the vote was wasted. It doesn't make me smarter to point it out. But it validates exactly what I said from the beginning. Those are the players just "happy to be on the team"! The ones that won't get in the game.


Third party candidates got ZERO EC votes.




There are only a few people on this board who backed the GOP candidate. We knew from the beginning that anything the GOP had was a better choice than hitlary. So we fought for him. Regardless of what was said, we stayed true to the mission, "No Hitlary"!


It doesn't make us smarter. But it does show who will stand up and fight. And who will not.


From the looks of things, we are not alone out there. But in here...
Uhhh, dude, I'm pretty sure Trump won the popular vote on the x, if we'd had one. Maybe most weren't as enthusiastic as you were but I think several of us were " never Hillary" voters.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 12, 2016, 03:50:54 PM
And by avoiding the question twice now I think I have my answer. You are a mirror image of the Obama cultists you've despised for 8 years.


Like your vote,  it was a worthless meaningless question!
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: AUTiger1 on November 12, 2016, 10:15:05 PM

Like your vote,  it was a worthless meaningless question!

Your arrogance and know it is showing here too.  Quit being a giant, gaping pussy and answer the man's question.

Oh, you won't, you're worse than those liberal elitist you love to hate.  Btw, fuck you again...I voted Trump.  So take your fucking ridicule elsewhere when you come at me about your beat male opinions you dick.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Token on November 12, 2016, 10:33:57 PM

All you good ole "good conscience" folks who pissed your vote away (TRUTH), but still ended up with Trump must be a bit perplexed. I mean now you don't get to stand up and thump your chest like you expected.


Bottom line is that the vote was wasted. It doesn't make me smarter to point it out. But it validates exactly what I said from the beginning. Those are the players just "happy to be on the team"! The ones that won't get in the game.


Third party candidates got ZERO EC votes.




There are only a few people on this board who backed the GOP candidate. We knew from the beginning that anything the GOP had was a better choice than hitlary. So we fought for him. Regardless of what was said, we stayed true to the mission, "No Hitlary"!


It doesn't make us smarter. But it does show who will stand up and fight. And who will not.


From the looks of things, we are not alone out there. But in here...


How would the election look if all of those Gary Johnson, Jill Stein and Evan McMullin votes had went Hillary's way?  Have you considered that?  I mean I think there were nearly 6 million 3rd party votes. 

The 3rd party got zero EC votes, but don't be a dumbass and pretend they didn't have an impact on the election. 

Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Ogre on November 12, 2016, 10:53:51 PM

Like your vote,  it was a worthless meaningless question!

Ok, SSTAU
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 13, 2016, 09:35:31 AM
Whiny ass turds. The lot of you.


Trump won, with or without your help.


Bottom line is if you didn't vote for him, you were a surrogate for her. And that is plain sad.


And you, whiney bitch. You know who you are. If you ever try to get in my face and call me that, WT will look like a lightweight when he's slapping down chizzy!
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Ogre on November 13, 2016, 10:06:31 AM
Settle down there, tough guy.  I haven't seen one person whining.  Hell, I was the first to eat crow and the first to say I'll support President Trump.  Since I'm not the best at putting pen to paper, my favorite Senator did it for me.  He sums up my feelings nicely here:

Quote
Ben Sasse: Everyone’s duty is to hope for Trump, work for America

Americans sent an unmistakable message Tuesday: Washington is broken and needs disruption. I hear that and agree.

In recent days, Nebraskans who voted for Donald Trump, or Hillary Clinton, or none of the above, have all asked me this question: “Now what? For over a year, you were concerned about Donald Trump’s character and about whether he recognizes the Constitution’s limits on presidential power. So are you going to oppose him now, or will you get on the Trump train?”

I get why folks are asking but, humbly, this shouldn’t be an either-or question.

If you voted for our president-elect, you should not now become an uncritical follower. And if you voted against Mr. Trump, you should not now be a knee-jerk critic. (As has been reported, I voted for Mike Pence on my presidential ballot.)

Now that the people have spoken, every American has two patriotic duties regarding our president-elect and the policy agenda he will outline:

First, we root for him, and especially for his steady hand as commander in chief. We pray that God grants him wisdom and discernment in his new calling. (My family has prayed for him for weeks at our breakfast table and will do so every morning.)

Second, even as we hope for his personal effectiveness and success, we should all still argue for principles we believe in. In the American system, the vast majority of policy is to be made by the people’s legislative representatives — not by the executive branch or by unelected judges. And thus the Congress needs to hear from the people on the issues.

There will be disagreements — between neighbors, between the executive and legislative branches, between political parties. This is a good thing. This is an intentional feature of our system, not a bug.

The marketplace of ideas should be civil, but it should also be contested. We should disagree respectfully. Reflexive tribalism and reflexive partisanship are signs of a sick republic, not a healthy one. And so we should argue about Mr. Trump’s coming proposals.

Millions of Americans — many inspired by Trump, but also a great many who are skeptical of him yet still reluctantly voted for him — understandably want Washington disrupted. We’re demanding an end to self-dealing and the one-size-fits-all answers of that city’s elite. Frankly, that’s why I ran two years ago.

Yes, there are absolutely some things that worry me — from his comments surrounding our First Amendment freedoms to his trade agenda, which would make it harder for Nebraska’s farming families — but while we won’t agree on everything, I am also encouraged by the policies that he appears now to be prioritizing with a Republican Congress.

These include many items conservatives have long championed:

» Nominating judges who reject lawmaking from the bench.

» Ending cronyism with an ethics package that starts with term limits.

» Repealing Obamacare and replacing it with a system that empowers families and patients over bureaucrats.

» Securing our borders as a prerequisite to any rational national security policy.

» Passing big tax reform, aimed not chiefly at the marginal rates of the wealthiest but at lowering the cost of trying and succeeding in America.

» Repealing large portions of the Dodd-Frank Act that make it especially difficult for small banks to lend in Nebraska.

I am delighted there is a moment of opportunity to advance a conservative agenda. And President-Elect Trump has an opportunity to make that conservative agenda his own.

Some Nebraskans will be less zealous about parts of this agenda. That’s OK. No voter — whether thrilled or worried about our new president — should uncritically join his “train” or uncritically hope for his failure. All or nothing isn’t how Americans think about government.

We are not North Koreans, swearing a loyalty oath to the “Dear Leader.” Nor are we the French Resistance, plotting against the new regime from day one. Rather, we should hope for his personal flourishing and his wisdom, and we should simultaneously vigorously debate his ideas.

Senators should not be reflexive antagonists. Nor should senators go along to get along. Rather, I’m there to do what Nebraskans hired me to do: Uphold my oath to defend the Constitution regardless of partisan politics, hear and represent their concerns in Washington, fight for limited government and for the limitless potential of every American and look for big solutions that create more opportunity for all.

I am going to be looking for places where we share common ground with the president. Yes, there will also be times when Congress and the White House disagree — that is part of our system. That’s why the founders created different branches of government.

Let’s get to work. Let’s look for common ground. Let’s reaffirm a Constitution that checks and balances the three branches of government.

And let’s all hope for our president’s success.

Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: AUTiger1 on November 13, 2016, 12:38:03 PM
Whiny ass turds. The lot of you.


Trump won, with or without your help.


Bottom line is if you didn't vote for him, you were a surrogate for her. And that is plain sad.


And you, whiney bitch. You know who you are. If you ever try to get in my face and call me that, WT will look like a lightweight when he's slapping down chizzy!

And you can't read.  I voted for Trump you arrogant prick.  You still didn't answer his question.  Btw, those 6 million 3rd party votes helped Trump.  He loses without them. 

Oh, and I'm solo scared.  Maybe you should just out a meme and put me in my rightful place.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 13, 2016, 01:37:38 PM
And you can't read.  I voted for Trump you arrogant prick.  You still didn't answer his question.  Btw, those 6 million 3rd party votes helped Trump.  He loses without them. 

Oh, and I'm solo scared.  Maybe you should just out a meme and put me in my rightful place.


Chill before that alligator mouth of yours gets  that hummingbird ass smacked.
Try reading above mister education. I specifically said IF you voted for Trump.


And what your misguided ass takes as arrogance is a lifetime of confidence!


You were not even addressed by me yet you come out bitching like the pansy you are. I am starting to feel like WT, time to smack some sissy fag ass!



Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: AUTiger1 on November 13, 2016, 04:15:51 PM

Chill before that alligator mouth of yours gets  that hummingbird ass smacked.
Try reading above mister education. I specifically said IF you voted for Trump.


And what your misguided ass takes as arrogance is a lifetime of confidence!


You were not even addressed by me yet you come out bitching like the pansy you are. I am starting to feel like WT, time to smack some sissy fag ass!

I think WT would have a better shot than you and he would defiantly go down after smack to the back of the head.

All that talk and you still haven't answered Ogre's question or admitted that the third party vote actually had an influence and won Trump the election.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Kaos on November 13, 2016, 11:06:59 PM
....admitted that the third party vote actually had an influence and won Trump the election.

I don't want to get in the middle of WWE Smackdown here, because I'm really only at this wrestling match to gloat from the sidelines.  BUT...

Your hypothesis only holds true if almost every voter who went third party voted for Clinton instead. 

Let's take Wisconsin's critical 10 Electoral Votes as an example primarily because Wisconsin was the closest of the "surprise" states. 

Here's how the voting broke down:

Donald Trump  1,409,467

Hillary Clinton  1,382,210

Gary Johnson  106,442

Jill Stein  30,980

Darrell Castle  12,179

Monica Moorehead  1,781

Rocky De La Fuente  1,561

Every third party vote in Wisc came up to 152,943.   Trump led by 27,247 in the final count. 

So for Clinton to win Wisconsin's Electoral Votes, she would have to capture 103,718 of the third party votes. (Half + 27,248).  That's 68%.   Even at 68% she wins by only a single vote.

Of every county in the entire state,  Clinton topped 55% in just two and 65% in just one.  She wasn't getting 68% of the third party vote. 

It might have been closer, but the wasted third party votes didn't hand Trump the election.  They were just wasted.  He would have won with or without them.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: GH2001 on November 14, 2016, 12:00:24 AM
I don't want to get in the middle of WWE Smackdown here, because I'm really only at this wrestling match to gloat from the sidelines.  BUT...

Your hypothesis only holds true if almost every voter who went third party voted for Clinton instead. 

Let's take Wisconsin's critical 10 Electoral Votes as an example primarily because Wisconsin was the closest of the "surprise" states. 

Here's how the voting broke down:

Donald Trump  1,409,467

Hillary Clinton  1,382,210

Gary Johnson  106,442

Jill Stein  30,980

Darrell Castle  12,179

Monica Moorehead  1,781

Rocky De La Fuente  1,561

Every third party vote in Wisc came up to 152,943.   Trump led by 27,247 in the final count. 

So for Clinton to win Wisconsin's Electoral Votes, she would have to capture 103,718 of the third party votes. (Half + 27,248).  That's 68%.   Even at 68% she wins by only a single vote.

Of every county in the entire state,  Clinton topped 55% in just two and 65% in just one.  She wasn't getting 68% of the third party vote. 

It might have been closer, but the wasted third party votes didn't hand Trump the election.  They were just wasted.  He would have won with or without them.

Im all about some Rocky De La Fuente.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 14, 2016, 05:35:59 AM

I think WT would have a better shot than you and he would defiantly go down after smack to the back of the head.

All that talk and you still haven't answered Ogre's question or admitted that the third party vote actually had an influence and won Trump the election.

Dude. I'm all about a bitch slap. You would never even touch my head.

But I digress. Here are my feelings below on the wasted votes. And I fight for America. Trump is only a president. America is much more. For that question to be asked means people still don't get Trump supports!

Your hypothesis only holds true if almost every voter who went third party voted for Clinton instead.  Let's take Wisconsin's critical 10 Electoral Votes as an example primarily because Wisconsin was the closest of the "surprise" states.  Here's how the voting broke down: Donald Trump  1,409,467Hillary Clinton  1,382,210Gary Johnson  106,442Jill Stein  30,980Darrell Castle  12,179Monica Moorehead  1,781Rocky De La Fuente  1,561Every third party vote in Wisc came up to 152,943.   Trump led by 27,247 in the final count.  So for Clinton to win Wisconsin's Electoral Votes, she would have to capture 103,718 of the third party votes. (Half + 27,248).  That's 68%.   Even at 68% she wins by only a single vote. Of every county in the entire state,  Clinton topped 55% in just two and 65% in just one.  She wasn't getting 68% of the third party vote. It might have been closer, but the wasted third party votes didn't hand Trump the election.  They were just wasted.  He would have won with or without them.

The above borriwed from a political ally who all but beat into you what was about to happen. Yet several on this board still wasted their vote.

Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: WiregrassTiger on November 14, 2016, 08:02:09 AM
I think WT would have a better shot than you and he would defiantly go down after smack to the back of the head.

All that talk and you still haven't answered Ogre's question or admitted that the third party vote actually had an influence and won Trump the election.
All hat, no cattle is my bet. Your talk is big but not very convincing Sparky.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: GH2001 on November 14, 2016, 09:05:01 AM

Chill before that alligator mouth of yours gets  that hummingbird ass smacked.
Try reading above mister education. I specifically said IF you voted for Trump.


And what your misguided ass takes as arrogance is a lifetime of confidence!


You were not even addressed by me yet you come out bitching like the pansy you are. I am starting to feel like WT, time to smack some sissy fag ass!

You live in your own little world. Little dude.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 14, 2016, 09:21:41 AM
You live in your own little world. Little dude.


I only addressed those who wasted their vote, and junior comes out windmilling like a 7th grade girl.


I wish I was a little dude. I'm damn tired of running and not getting smaller!
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: GH2001 on November 14, 2016, 10:00:52 AM

I only addressed those who wasted their vote, and junior comes out windmilling like a 7th grade girl.


I wish I was a little dude. I'm damn tired of running and not getting smaller!

Your last couple of pages of posts are ridiculous and you know it. Maybe everyone just needs to the chill the F out for a min.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: WiregrassTiger on November 14, 2016, 10:23:35 AM
Your last couple of pages of posts are ridiculous and you know it. Maybe everyone just needs to the chill the F out for a min.
Maybe they could just meet up and take care of this like real men. Maybe, tomorrow behind the Dollar General, where they both probably buy their dress work shirts.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 14, 2016, 10:49:51 AM
Maybe they could just meet up and take care of this like real men. Maybe, tomorrow behind the Dollar General, where they both probably buy their dress work shirts.


Alas. I cannot. I'm too far away. And I'll need a few months to get back into fighting shape.


Basketball game maybe?
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: AUTiger1 on November 14, 2016, 10:56:40 AM
Maybe they could just meet up and take care of this like real men. Maybe, tomorrow behind the Dollar General, where they both probably buy their dress work shirts.

I prefer the Publix...

EDIT:.....Wait a damn minute.  What's wrong with buying my dress work shirts at the DG?  I'll have you know I buy my dress work shirts at the local consignment shop.  That way they can double as my Sunday best.


Alas. I cannot. I'm too far away. And I'll need a few months to get back into fighting shape.


Basketball game maybe?

You damn sure don't want to challenge me in hoops, especially if it's going to take you a few months to get into shape.  I float like Jordan, handle the ball and shoot like Curry and play D like Bird. 
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 14, 2016, 10:58:11 AM
I prefer the Publix...

You damn sure don't want to challenge me in hoops, especially if it's going to take you a few months to get into shape.  I float like Jordan, handle the ball and shoot like Curry and play D like Bird.


I got a jump shot like Bird...minus the accuracy!
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: War Eagle!!! on November 14, 2016, 11:01:33 AM
Did yall just kiss and make up? I think yall did just kiss and make up.

Pussies...
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Snaggletiger on November 14, 2016, 11:05:12 AM
 :cheers:
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: GH2001 on November 14, 2016, 11:08:55 AM
Did yall just kiss and make up? I think yall did just kiss and make up.

Pussies...

Virtual rubbing of the tips.
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: CCTAU on November 14, 2016, 11:13:13 AM
Oh Kiss my ass you bunch wasted voters. Y'all try to ruin everything!
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: AUTiger1 on November 14, 2016, 11:43:53 AM
I don't want to get in the middle of WWE Smackdown here, because I'm really only at this wrestling match to gloat from the sidelines.  BUT...

Your hypothesis only holds true if almost every voter who went third party voted for Clinton instead. 

Let's take Wisconsin's critical 10 Electoral Votes as an example primarily because Wisconsin was the closest of the "surprise" states. 

Here's how the voting broke down:

Donald Trump  1,409,467

Hillary Clinton  1,382,210

Gary Johnson  106,442

Jill Stein  30,980

Darrell Castle  12,179

Monica Moorehead  1,781

Rocky De La Fuente  1,561

Every third party vote in Wisc came up to 152,943.   Trump led by 27,247 in the final count. 

So for Clinton to win Wisconsin's Electoral Votes, she would have to capture 103,718 of the third party votes. (Half + 27,248).  That's 68%.   Even at 68% she wins by only a single vote.

Of every county in the entire state,  Clinton topped 55% in just two and 65% in just one.  She wasn't getting 68% of the third party vote. 

It might have been closer, but the wasted third party votes didn't hand Trump the election.  They were just wasted.  He would have won with or without them.

In Michigan she lost buy 11, 837 votes.  There was 242,867 third party votes.  Not to hard to think that she could pull 11K plus half in what has been a blue state strong hold since 1988.  She very easily could have won Michigan.  She needs 54% of that vote.  You stated that she only topped 55% in jut two times and 65% just one time.  Not true.

Washington - 55%
Vermont - 61%
RI - 55%
NY - 59%
NJ - 55%
Maryland - 61%
Massachusetts - 61%
Ill - 55%
HW - 62%
DC - 93%
Connecticut - 55%
Cali - 62%

With Wisconsin, which hasn't went red since 1994, it's not hard to believe that she could pull that many (68%) 3rd party votes.  Lot's of Independent and Bernie supporters did vote Johnson.  It's hard to estimate what those that decide to vote third party are going to do.  2000, what happens if Nader isn't running on the Green ticket in FL?  Chances are Gore wins.  I know that the pollsters were wrong.  Rasmussen and the LA Times nailed it.  They showed Trump with a 2+ lead in one and the other showed tied.  Once they added in the third party he took a higher lead and took the lead in the other. 

Not making a case for Hillary, but making a case that the third party vote does count and influences elections.  In the end it doesn't matter.  He won and hopefully he will make some decent Supreme Court Justices.  Only reason he got my vote and I know several more that voted for him the same reason I did.

You also forgot that Nick Saban got a vote in Alabama and Harambe got votes too. 


 
Title: Re: Winners and Losers ( Let's play a game )
Post by: Kaos on November 14, 2016, 12:17:56 PM
In Michigan she lost buy 11, 837 votes.  There was 242,867 third party votes.  Not to hard to think that she could pull 11K plus half in what has been a blue state strong hold since 1988.  She very easily could have won Michigan.  She needs 54% of that vote.   As of the last last time I checked, Michigan wasn't called or considered in the total.  So she can even have that state and it won't change anything.


You stated that she only topped 55% in jut two times and 65% just one time.  Not true.
I was looking at every county in Wisconsin only.  How she polled in other states was irrelevant to my point.  In Wisconsin, where she would have needed 68% of the independent votes to go ahead by just one?  Wasn't going to happen.

Washington - 55%
Vermont - 61%
RI - 55%
NY - 59%
NJ - 55%
Maryland - 61%
Massachusetts - 61%
Ill - 55%
HW - 62%
DC - 93%
Connecticut - 55%
Cali - 62%
^^ Bunch of places that went to Clinton and don't matter in terms of their percentages

With Wisconsin, which hasn't went red since 1994, it's not hard to believe that she could pull that many (68%) 3rd party votes.  Lot's of Independent and Bernie supporters did vote Johnson.  Yes, it is hard to believe.  I think it's impossible actually when you consider the few counties that went blue and the majority that didn't

It's hard to estimate what those that decide to vote third party are going to do.  2000, what happens if Nader isn't running on the Green ticket in FL?  Chances are Gore wins.  I know that the pollsters were wrong.  Rasmussen and the LA Times nailed it.  They showed Trump with a 2+ lead in one and the other showed tied.  Once they added in the third party he took a higher lead and took the lead in the other. 

Not making a case for Hillary, but making a case that the third party vote does count and influences elections.  In the end it doesn't matter.  He won and hopefully he will make some decent Supreme Court Justices.  Only reason he got my vote and I know several more that voted for him the same reason I did.
I still contend that third party doesn't make much of a difference.  The only time I think it really did is when Perot pulled Bush voters and Bill took office.  I was wrong to characterize it as a wasted vote, but voting third party to me is sort of like being a South Alabama fan. What's the point?  You're going to have a good game or two and maybe fool yourself into thinking you can compete.  And then you get the reality. Why bother? 

You also forgot that Nick Saban got a vote in Alabama and Harambe got votes too.