Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports
The Library => The SGA => Topic started by: AUTailgatingRules on June 22, 2016, 04:55:06 PM
-
Rut Row
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/7006105d422740f0b4b8675c90f9a154/emails-key-security-features-disabled-clintons-server
WASHINGTON (AP) — State Department staffers wrestled for weeks in December 2010 over a serious technical problem with then-Secretary Hillary Clinton's home email server, causing them to temporarily disable security features that left the server more vulnerable to hackers, according to emails released Wednesday.
Just weeks later, according to previously disclosed emails, hackers attacked the server, forcing Clinton's staff to shut it down. The next day, one of Clinton's closest aides, Huma Abedin, wrote to other high ranking staff: "Don't email hrc (Clinton) anything sensitive. I can explain more in person."
The emails were released under court order Wednesday to the conservative legal advocacy group Judicial Watch, which has sued the State Department over access to public records related to the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee's service as the nation's top diplomat between 2009 and 2013.
The emails, reviewed by The Associated Press, show that State Department technical staff disabled software intended to block phishing emails that could deliver dangerous viruses. They were trying urgently to resolve an apparent conflict between the server's built-in email delivery features with a version of "ScanMail for Exchange" security software from Trend Micro Inc. that had been installed on her server. Clinton has not previously described any security protections on her server.
Sponsored Links
If You Owe Less Than $300k, Use Obama's Once-In-A-Lifetime Mortgage Relief Program
Lower My Bills
Don't Want Trump in the White House? Support Hillary Here
Paid for by Hillary Victory Fund - hillaryclinton.com/go
"This should trump all other activities," a senior technical official, Ken LaVolpe, told IT employees in a Dec. 17, 2010, email. Another senior State Department official, Thomas W. Lawrence, wrote days later in an email that Abedin personally was asking for an update about the server repairs. Abedin and Clinton, who both used the private server, had complained that emails each sent to State Department employees were not being reliably received.
After technical staffers turned off some security features, Lawrence cautioned in an email, "We view this as a Band-Aid and fear it's not 100 percent fully effective."
Clinton has repeatedly denied there is any evidence her private email server ever was breached. Her campaign did not immediately provide comment Wednesday.
On Jan. 9, 2011, a State Department IT staffer was forced to shut down Clinton's server because he believed "someone was trying to hack us." Later that day, he wrote, "We were attacked again so I shut (the server) down for a few min." It was one of several occasions when email access to Clinton's BlackBerry smartphone was disrupted because her private server was down, according to the documents.
The AP reported last year that in the early morning hours of Aug. 3, 2011, Clinton received infected emails, disguised as speeding tickets from New York. The emails instructed recipients to print the attached tickets. Opening an attachment would have allowed hackers to take over control of a victim's computer.
In a blistering audit released last month, the State Department's inspector general concluded that Clinton and her team ignored clear internal guidance that her email setup broke federal standards and could leave sensitive material vulnerable to hackers. Her aides twice brushed aside concerns, in one case telling technical staff "the matter was not to be discussed further," the report said.
The State Department has released more than 52,000 pages of Clinton's work-related emails, including some that have since been classified. Clinton has withheld thousands of additional emails, saying they were personal. The emails released Wednesday were not made available until after the inspector general's office published its report, and Judicial Watch asked a federal judge to force the State Department to turn them over.
The case is one of about three dozen lawsuits over access to records related to Clinton's time as secretary, including one filed by the AP. As part of its ongoing suit, lawyers from Judicial Watch on Wednesday questioned Bryan Pagliano, a former IT staffer for Clinton who helped set up the server, under oath. According to the group, Pagliano repeatedly responded to questions by invoking his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, as he did last year before a congressional committee.
The FBI is also investigating whether Clinton's use of the private email server imperiled government secrets. It has recently interviewed Clinton's top aides, including former chief of staff Cheryl Mills and deputy chief of staff Abedin.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said in a speech Wednesday that Clinton's email server "was easily hacked by foreign governments." Trump cited no new evidence that hackers had successfully breached Clinton's server, but he said unspecified enemies of the United States were in possession of all her emails.
"So they probably now have a blackmail file over someone who wants to be President of the United States. This fact alone disqualifies her from the presidency," Trump said. "We can't hand over our government to someone whose deepest, darkest secrets may be in the hands of our enemies."
____
Follow Michael Biesecker on Twitter at https://twitter.com/mbieseck
-
I'm sorry but your link has been disallowed.
It did not come from the monkey cage, which is of the utmost integrity. Therefore.
Also, how can this possibly be an issue when Trump has bad hair and watches Xena the Warrior Phobe when he isn't making Misty ogling commentaries.
-
I'm sorry but your link has been disallowed.
It did not come from the monkey cage, which is of the utmost integrity. Therefore.
Also, how can this possibly be an issue when Trump has bad hair and watches Xena the Warrior Phobe when he isn't making Misty ogling commentaries.
Stop this dipshittery.
I've never ever ever ever ever excused her for this shit and agree it is a huge problem. And have expressed it clearly hundreds of times on TigersX.com.
Here is case # 5,937,652 in the last month of you pants-shitting at the opportunity to hurl idiotic, needless insults, and I AGREE WITH YOU ON THIS, even though you want to build another goddamn strawman because THAT IS ALL YOU ARE FUCKING CAPABLE OF in discussion.
You are so goddamn pathetic with this shit, it is humiliating to watch. Just fucking stop being such a goddamn baby.
Point to the "Monkey Cage" article so I can point you to the same information in a mainstream media article so you can quit your idiotic false equivalence horseshit that whatever site I used to post FACTS in graph form is not the same thing as CCTAU's dipshit memes or Redliberty.mediafire.biz articles equivocating a hate group with a group of lawyers.
Have a conversation like a goddamn adult for once in your fucking life.
-
Stop this dipshittery.
I've never ever ever ever ever excused her for this shit and agree it is a huge problem. And have expressed it clearly hundreds of times on TigersX.com.
Here is case # 5,937,652 in the last month of you pants-shitting at the opportunity to hurl idiotic, needless insults, and I AGREE WITH YOU ON THIS, even though you want to build another goddamn strawman because THAT IS ALL YOU ARE FUCKING CAPABLE OF in discussion.
You are so goddamn pathetic with this shit, it is humiliating to watch. Just fucking stop being such a goddamn baby.
Point to the "Monkey Cage" article so I can point you to the same information in a mainstream media article so you can quit your idiotic false equivalence horseshit that whatever site I used to post FACTS in graph form is not the same thing as CCTAU's dipshit memes or Redliberty.mediafire.biz articles equivocating a hate group with a group of lawyers.
Have a conversation like a goddamn adult for once in your fucking life.
She is going to be your president if you and enough people vote for the pro marijuana Gary Johnson.
Just saying
-
Stop this dipshittery.
I've never ever ever ever ever excused her for this shit and agree it is a huge problem. And have expressed it clearly hundreds of times on TigersX.com.
Here is case # 5,937,652 in the last month of you pants-shitting at the opportunity to hurl idiotic, needless insults, and I AGREE WITH YOU ON THIS, even though you want to build another goddamn strawman because THAT IS ALL YOU ARE FUCKING CAPABLE OF in discussion.
You are so goddamn pathetic with this shit, it is humiliating to watch. Just fucking stop being such a goddamn baby.
Point to the "Monkey Cage" article so I can point you to the same information in a mainstream media article so you can quit your idiotic false equivalence horseshit that whatever site I used to post FACTS in graph form is not the same thing as CCTAU's dipshit memes or Redliberty.mediafire.biz articles equivocating a hate group with a group of lawyers.
Have a conversation like a goddamn adult for once in your fucking life.
It's after 5. You can start drinking now.
Keep doing it until you mellow out a bit. The Internet is not serious business.
You are so goddamn pathetic with this shit, it is humiliating to watch. Just fucking stop being such a goddamn baby.
Might I also suggest a shiny mirror? Or a shoe that fits?
-
She is going to be your president if you and enough people vote for the pro marijuana Gary Johnson.
Just saying
Not if he wins. Not if others get on board, which I think is perfectly reasonable given the choices the two parties have offered as a result in this unprecedented, completely insane 2016 election cycle.
By the way, there is NO (read "N-O") study or poll that shows Johnson is taking more votes from Trump than he is Hillary. I'm a perfect anecdotal example. If I was FORCED to vote for one of these fucks, it would be Hillary. Sorry. But I'm not. You should be happy. He is pulling 3% from Hillary, 3% from Trump, 3% from "Other" and 1% from "Not voting". (http://reason.com/blog/2016/06/16/gary-johnson-taking-the-same-support-fro)
I think her compulsive lying is repulsive, but not any worse than Trump's and still think she is capable of cognitive thought and Trump is a drooling fucking idiot.
The reward of a possible Johnson presidency is completely worth the "risk" of not letting Forrest Trump wreck the country to me.
Speaking of, watch CNN tonight at 8pm for a Townhall with Johnson.
-
I call bullshit on this bullshit. State Department knew about it? And now, @wishes to cover billary's ass. LAME.
http://www.theonion.com/video/breaking-news-some-bullshit-happening-somewhere-16928
-
Not if he wins. Not if others get on board, which I think is perfectly reasonable given the choices the two parties have offered as a result in this unprecedented, completely insane 2016 election cycle.
By the way, there is NO (read "N-O") study or poll that shows Johnson is taking more votes from Trump than he is Hillary. I'm a perfect anecdotal example. If I was FORCED to vote for one of these fucks, it would be Hillary. Sorry. But I'm not. You should be happy. He is pulling 3% from Hillary, 3% from Trump, 3% from "Other" and 1% from "Not voting". (http://reason.com/blog/2016/06/16/gary-johnson-taking-the-same-support-fro)
I think her compulsive lying is repulsive, but not any worse than Trump's and still think she is capable of cognitive thought and Trump is a drooling fucking idiot.
The reward of a possible Johnson presidency is completely worth the "risk" of not letting Forrest Trump wreck the country to me.
Speaking of, watch CNN tonight at 8pm for a Townhall with Johnson.
I'm sorry, this is not the University of Alabama athletic department.
3 + 3 + 3 + 1 does not equal diddly shit. If you honestly think this fruitbat is coming close to drawing 10% of the vote you've been to Colorado, bought out half the cannabis stores there and then smoked it all.
Kanye West would get more votes.
There is NO possible Johnson presidency, unless you're talking Andrew or Lyndon (either of which are currently drawing more votes than Gary).
This is Jerry Brown, Ralph Nader, Pat Paulsen, Breckenridge, Lester Maddox, John Anderson, Pat Buchanan shit all over again. We've seen it a million times and it always comes to the same result.
The ONLY third party candidate that EVER had a chance to make noise was George Corley Wallace. I'd vote for him today before I'd wad up my vote and shove it up a wild hog's ass by voting for Gary "No Chance in Hell" Johnson.
Are you even aware that this rip van winkle in a bad suit ran in 2012? Well, he did. And when the votes were in, he failed to capture 1%. He really rocked his home fucking state, though. Got a whopping 3.5% there.
Why don't you just write in a vote for Batman? Have a better chance with that.
BTW: Your futile Johnson screed has absolutely ZERO to do with Hillary Clinton lying to the American public about sensitive and classified information being exposed or any of the other fraudulent, self-serving statements she's made.
So please stop building scarecrows and get back to the topic at hand.
-
I'm sorry, this is not the University of Alabama athletic department.
3 + 3 + 3 + 1 does not equal diddly shit. If you honestly think this fruitbat is coming close to drawing 10% of the vote you've been to Colorado, bought out half the cannabis stores there and then smoked it all.
Kanye West would get more votes.
There is NO possible Johnson presidency, unless you're talking Andrew or Lyndon (either of which are currently drawing more votes than Gary).
This is Jerry Brown, Ralph Nader, Pat Paulsen, Breckenridge, Lester Maddox, John Anderson, Pat Buchanan shit all over again. We've seen it a million times and it always comes to the same result.
The ONLY third party candidate that EVER had a chance to make noise was George Corley Wallace. I'd vote for him today before I'd wad up my vote and shove it up a wild hog's ass by voting for Gary "No Chance in Hell" Johnson.
Are you even aware that this rip van winkle in a bad suit ran in 2012? Well, he did. And when the votes were in, he failed to capture 1%. He really rocked his home fucking state, though. Got a whopping 3.5% there.
Why don't you just write in a vote for Batman? Have a better chance with that.
BTW: Your futile Johnson screed has absolutely ZERO to do with Hillary Clinton lying to the American public about sensitive and classified information being exposed or any of the other fraudulent, self-serving statements she's made.
So please stop building scarecrows and get back to the topic at hand.
I voted for him then when I knew he had no chance and was OK with Obama and kinda liked Romney.
I sure as shit am voting for him now that I despise both candidates, along with the majority of the country, and he actually has a chance to at least make a dent, lending legitimacy to the Libertarian party.
As for the part you just tacked on at the end, which is it? Stupid or liar? You are one or the other.
I replied FUCKING DIRECTLY to this post. Not to you.
She is going to be your president if you and enough people vote for the pro marijuana Gary Johnson.
Just saying
-
I voted for him then when I knew her had no chance and was OK with Obama and kinda liked Romney.
I sure as shit am voting for him now that I despise both candidates, along with the majority of the country, and he actually has a chance to at least make a dent, lending legitimacy to the Libertarian party.
As for the part you just tacked on at the end, which is it? Stupid or liar? You are one or the other.
I replied FUCKING DIRECTLY to this post. Not to you.
You're an angry elf.
-
You're an angry elf.
You're an idiot and/or liar.
I'm done sugar coating it.
-
Do you see no irony here that you posted this earlier in the thread, despite the fact that I have NEVER said a goddamn thing about his physical appearance or any other such petty shit:
Also, how can this possibly be an issue when Trump has bad hair and watches Xena the Warrior Phobe when he isn't making Misty ogling commentaries.
And then a few posts later, your primary issue with Johnson is:
Are you even aware that this rip van winkle in a bad suit ran in 2012?
Stupid or liar?
-
You're an idiot and/or liar.
I'm done sugar coating it.
Good, I'm cutting back on sugar these days.
Since you happen to know that I'm neither of those things, perhaps you better check yourself as you've wrecked yourself.
-
I sincerely apologize to AuTailgatingRules for strewing bait in his serious thread. I knew it would lure poo flingers and it did.
I promise to try to keep from provoking the poo flings from this point forward.
But I must bash Hillary, her awful stained teeth (with blood maybe?), her hideous hairdo and her Kim Jong IlUn pants suits. She's abominable.
She's lying without any reservation, changing her story as it suits her and proving that she does not have the integrity or self-awareness to be a city councilman, much less the president.
The woman is evil. And if she is elected, I figure I'll regret saying this because she's going to badly use the resources at her disposal to extract petty retribution against everyone who spoke against her withered ass. Because that's who she is. She's vindictive and petty.
That's the topic, not Doobie Johnson's rumpled, sleepy, straw-haired appearance.
-
Good, I'm cutting back on sugar these days.
Since you happen to know that I'm neither of those things, perhaps you better check yourself as you've wrecked yourself.
Did you see that my first mention of Johnson cake was after I was directly addressed about him, and then lied that I brought it up first, or are you fucking illiterate and were unable to read and process what transpired?
Stupid or liar? A or B?
Do you not recognize your hypocrisy in accusing me of superficial complaints about Trump (feel free to copy and paste where I ever did) and yet a couple posts later, express petty superficial complaints about Johnson? Or are you gonna deny the hypocrisy?
Stupid or liar? A or B?
-
Johnson cake
I THOUGHT we were cutting back on sugar. And then you come up with cake.
Wait, is it one of those nasty sugar free ones? I tried those and they don't taste right.
-
If I ever reaches the point where I would vote for hitlary in any election. Or I was ever "OK" with obama, I would hope I have the balls to kill myself!
-
I sincerely apologize to AuTailgatingRules for strewing bait in his serious thread. I knew it would lure poo flingers and it did.
(http://pre13.deviantart.net/1dee/th/pre/f/2008/263/e/2/trolls_by_whynne.png)
-
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/13494866_10208761751875244_8784371201246412439_n.jpg?oh=11657a4f9c21bdc0ab0cd482cc8c5ae9&oe=57EFDCBC)
-
She's crooked Hillary for a reason folks! Most corrupt politician in our lifetimes.
-
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/284481-clinton-it-specialist-invokes-the-fifth-100-times (http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/284481-clinton-it-specialist-invokes-the-fifth-100-times)
The man believed to have set up and maintained the private server in the basement of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s New York home invoked his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination more than 125 times during a deposition as part of a civil court case on Wednesday.
Fox News reported that Bryan Pagliano’s sworn testimony with conservative organization Judicial Watch lasted roughly 90 minutes, during which the IT expert repeatedly read a carefully worded statement off of an index card while refusing to answer questions.
Pagliano’s deposition on Wednesday was originally scheduled to occur more than two weeks ago but was postponed when his lawyers notified the court that the former State Department employee would be pleading the Fifth.
The IT official could have provided important information in the case, which might have resolved lingering questions about the state of Clinton’s private server, how information was preserved and the security protocols used to protect her data.
But he declined to answer questions, his lawyers said, in part due to the federal government’s decision to grant him limited immunity as part of its ongoing criminal probe related to the server and the possibility that classified information was mishandled.
After a back-and-forth between the two legal teams, Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled this month that the details of that immunity deal could remain secret.
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said the “astounding†number of times Pagliano pled the Fifth “is another reminder of how much she has to hide and how serious the FBI’s criminal investigation really is.â€
“Clinton’s extraordinarily reckless conduct and dishonest attempts to avoid accountability do not fit the profile of someone worthy of the highest office in the land,†Priebus added in a statement. “Clinton’s actions in this case alone are disqualifying and her aide’s stonewalling today is just a prelude to the kind of White House she would run.â€
Despite his resistance to giving up any possible incriminating information, Pagliano’s appearance in the deposition with Judicial Watch might reflect poorly on Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.
Unlike in criminal cases, judges in civil suits are allowed to draw inferences from a witness’s decision not to answer questions, potentially increasing the likelihood that Clinton herself is asked to testify as part of the Judicial Watch lawsuit. Clinton’s campaign would surely vigorously oppose any request for her to appear, and the event could dramatically shake up the presidential race.
Judicial Watch has filed multiple open records lawsuits related to Clinton’s exclusive use of a private email account and server while serving as the nation’s top diplomat. Depositions have been granted in two of those cases, and the decision in a third was this week put on hold pending the outcomes of those two other cases.
Two other former aides are scheduled to be interviewed before the end of the month: longtime deputy Huma Abedin and Patrick Kennedy, former undersecretary for management.
-
(http://pre13.deviantart.net/1dee/th/pre/f/2008/263/e/2/trolls_by_whynne.png)
You just may be the least self aware person I've encountered in quite a while.
Your perception of what's happening here is so out of whack it defies belief. You are the only person unaware that you are dancing like a drunk sorority girl at a Dave Matthews concert with every button I push. I even graciously gave you opportunities to step off the rage ledge and scale back. But you rejected even that.
You're the only one who can't see it. And you keep digging the hole ever deeper.
Step back. Laugh at yourself. Put down the handfuls of feces. You really need to.
-
You just may be the least self aware person I've encountered in quite a while.
Your perception of what's happening here is so out of whack it defies belief. You are the only person unaware that you are dancing like a drunk sorority girl at a Dave Matthews concert with every button I push. I even graciously gave you opportunities to step off the rage ledge and scale back. But you rejected even that.
You're the only one who can't see it. And you keep digging the hole ever deeper.
Step back. Laugh at yourself. Put down the handfuls of feces. You really need to.
Take what you said. Flip it. Then you're right.
-
Take what you said. Flip it. Then you're right.
You need help. And are the only one who doesn't see it.
:facepalm:
-
You need help. And are the only one who doesn't see it.
:facepalm:
Take what you said. Flip it. Then you're right.
-
^^^The equivalent of "I know you are, but what am I"! ^^^^
Just waiting for the neener, neener, neener!
-
^^^The equivalent of "I know you are, but what am I"! ^^^^
Just waiting for the neener, neener, neener!
Take what you said. Flip it. Then you're right.
-
^^^The equivalent of "I know you are, but what am I"! ^^^^
Just waiting for the neener, neener, neener!
(https://media.giphy.com/media/GjMtX3BPF8UqA/giphy-facebook_s.jpg)
^
C'zad
-
(https://media.giphy.com/media/GjMtX3BPF8UqA/giphy-facebook_s.jpg)
^
C'zad
Take what you said. Flip it. Then you're right.
-
You forgot neener, neener, neener!
-
Here is case # 5,937,652 in the last month of you pants-shitting at the opportunity to hurl idiotic, needless insults, and I AGREE WITH YOU ON THIS, even though you want to build another goddamn strawman because THAT IS ALL YOU ARE FUCKING CAPABLE OF in discussion.
Here is case # 5,937,652 of you swallowing the bait whole.
-
Here is case # 5,937,652 of you swallowing the bait whole.
I think maybe. Just maybe....K is being half serious at best. And chad is being much greater than half serious at minimum. Just maybe. That is the disconnect.
-
I think maybe. Just maybe....K is being half serious at best. And chad is being much greater than half serious at minimum. Just maybe. That is the disconnect.
Probably. Once Chizad understands that Kaos is just an asshole and you can't change that fact, these conversations will probably be much more civil.
-
I think maybe. Just maybe....K is being half serious at best. And chad is being much greater than half serious at minimum. Just maybe. That is the disconnect.
You're the one that lent credence to his assertion that I'm the one who drives his honest attempts at serious discussion off course in favor of unnecessary ad-hominem insults, Tom Ritter.
Maybe your judgement is skewed.
-
Probably. Once Chizad understands that Kaos is just an asshole and you can't change that fact, these conversations will probably be much more civil.
Maybe I've been aware of that for years...
-
You're the one that lent credence to his assertion that I'm the one who drives his honest attempts at serious discussion off course in favor of unnecessary ad-hominem insults, Tom Ritter.
Maybe your judgement is skewed.
Once upon a time they may have been the case.
In the last week? Not so much.
There is an easy way to prove it. I would say you are being pretty intense and serious over this whole thing this week. Ammarite? Nothing wrong with that. You give a shit. You are passionate. That's fine.
K...how serious are you being at the moment with your posts?
Allls I'm sayin homie is that I think he is taking this much less serious than you at the moment. You two are on two different planets at the moment. And I hate to see you driving yourself nuts over it.
-
Once upon a time they may have been the case.
In the last week? Not so much.
There is an easy way to prove it. I would say you are being pretty intense and serious over this whole thing this week. Ammarite? Nothing wrong with that. You give a shit. You are passionate. That's fine.
K...how serious are you being at the moment with your posts?
Allls I'm sayin homie is that I think he is taking this much less serious than you at the moment. You two are on two different planets at the moment. And I hate to see you driving yourself nuts over it.
"Taking way too serious" = Pointing out his blatant lies, verifiably false accusations, and unnecessary insults that he (and you, and apparently others) claims he doesn't make.
Just because you agree with him, and it causes you distress when his bullshit is exposed for what it is doesn't mean I'm the bad guy.
-
"Taking way too serious" = Pointing out his blatant lies, verifiably false accusations, and unnecessary insults that he (and you, and apparently others) claims he doesn't make.
Just because you agree with him, and it causes you distress when his bullshit is exposed for what it is doesn't mean I'm the bad guy.
I think everyone just understands that he's an asshole and takes what he says with a grain of salt, so maybe they just process it a little differently. Of course he's full of shit sometimes. Everyone else is just simply satisfied going with "Yeah, that's bullshit" instead of wasting time trying to reason with or change his mind. More than likely, neither will happen. It's like when I'm training a new person at work; if I have to beat them over the head with something repeatedly, they're not going to get it anyway.
-
I think everyone just understands that he's an asshole and takes what he says with a grain of salt, so maybe they just process it a little differently. Of course he's full of shit sometimes. Everyone else is just simply satisfied going with "Yeah, that's bullshit" instead of wasting time trying to reason with or change his mind.
I think you grossly overestimate the ability of many on this board to discern what is bullshit or not.
Case in point: The conversation we're forced to have now due to his bullshit mischaracterization of what transpired in this thread.
-
Kaos may be an asshole. I won't argue that. But his debating and reasoning skills aren't in question from where I sit. He's not squealing like a school girl or freaking out because anyone disagrees with his opinion.
Maybe that's because his stance appears to jive with the majority on this board. I don't know. Still, I think he's been the more rational and adult in the debate.
-
Kaos may be an asshole. I won't argue that. But his debating and reasoning skills aren't in question from where I sit. He's not squealing like a school girl or freaking out because anyone disagrees with his opinion.
Maybe that's because his stance appears to jive with the majority on this board. I don't know. Still, I think he's been the more rational and adult in the debate.
Marvel at his ability to discern from bullshit, RWS. Should totally continue to go unchecked.
-
Probably. Once Chizad understands that Kaos is just an asshole and you can't change that fact, these conversations will probably be much more civil.
But I'm a lovable one.
-
"Taking way too serious" = Pointing out his blatant lies, verifiably false accusations, and unnecessary insults that he (and you, and apparently others) claims he doesn't make.
Just because you agree with him, and it causes you distress when his bullshit is exposed for what it is doesn't mean I'm the bad guy.
Oh, you're the bad guy.
You think you're pointing out "lies" and exposing me.
Wrong. Exposed yourself. Everybody saw your pee pee. And your poo hole.
-
Oh, you're the bad guy.
You think you're pointing out "lies" and exposing me.
Wrong. Exposed yourself. Everybody saw your pee pee. And your poo hole.
Your mistake is thinking I'm Chopper and give a fuck less what anyone in this thread thinks about me. He whipped your ass in debate until, just like you're doing now, you strayed from the actual debate and into personal insults and your false reality. The difference is he was insecure about his popularity, where I could not give less of a shit. So what you think is a crushing ego blow is just more hilarious distortion of the truth.
Run a popularity poll. See if I cry when you win by 200%. Doesn't change that you're either stupid or a liar. Just say which one, man.
-
Your mistake is thinking I'm Chopper and give a fuck less what anyone in this thread thinks about me. He whipped your ass in debate until, just like you're doing now, you strayed from the actual debate and into personal insults and your false reality. The difference is he was insecure about his popularity, where I could not give less of a shit. So what you think is a crushing ego blow is just more hilarious distortion of the truth.
Run a popularity poll. See if I cry when you win by 200%. Doesn't change that you're either stupid or a liar. Just say which one, man.
When everybody thinks you have a problem but you? Hmmmm.
Chopper...whipped my ass? He couldn't even reach me. It is to laugh.
For what it's worth C'zad (and for the millionth time) I've not insulted you in this thread or any other. Still haven't. Not gonna. That's something else everybody else sees but you. Him I insulted. But I don't do that any more.
Your feelings are hurt because you think you're laying the wood to me when I'm merely toying with the entire thing for the sport of it. You expect huzzahs!! for your magnificent skill in slicing and dicing little ole me with your Clintonian intelligence. Except you're not doing it. You're not getting it. All the links and the big long multi-quote responses (that I doled right back, bad on me...) just made you look churlish and irrational. Whatever point you may have had was lost in the tantrum. Lost on me and pretty much everybody else.
Quite honestly, I feel badly for you. I actually like you from what I know of you and think you make a rational case in most instances. You're a good ally when you're on the same page with me or whoever. Here though? You just fell completely off the beam and as your old pal chopper used to say "crapped your slacks..." It was difficult to watch. You got emotionally involved (deeply) when I never really gave much of a fuck except to repeatedly state "anybody but Hillary." That is and was my only real position. No link you were ever going to post, no condescending characterization of Trump or his supporters, no picture of Doobie Johnson's drowsy face was ever going to change my mind. And still won't. Well, maybe. If you find that picture of Trump actually eating live babies or if you get a signed note from Jesus or Moses saying I should vote for somebody else, then maybe. Otherwise I'm pretty much entrenched.
I'm sorry you couldn't get anybody on your wagon.
Say, will I have to post a link for that poll? Because if I do I'm not going to bother running it.
I will just borrow this one:
(http://db-engines.com/pictures/category_ranking_2014_01.png)
Just make all the dates 2016. I am wide column stores, you are object oriented dbms, Dallas is relational dbms.
-
When everybody thinks you have a problem but you? Hmmmm.
Chopper...whipped my ass? He couldn't even reach me. It is to laugh.
For what it's worth C'zad (and for the millionth time) I've not insulted you in this thread or any other. Still haven't. Not gonna. That's something else everybody else sees but you. Him I insulted. But I don't do that any more.
Your feelings are hurt because you think you're laying the wood to me when I'm merely toying with the entire thing for the sport of it. You expect huzzahs!! for your magnificent skill in slicing and dicing little ole me with your Clintonian intelligence. Except you're not doing it. You're not getting it. All the links and the big long multi-quote responses (that I doled right back, bad on me...) just made you look churlish and irrational. Whatever point you may have had was lost in the tantrum. Lost on me and pretty much everybody else.
Quite honestly, I feel badly for you. I actually like you from what I know of you and think you make a rational case in most instances. You're a good ally when you're on the same page with me or whoever. Here though? You just fell completely off the beam and as your old pal chopper used to say "crapped your slacks..." It was difficult to watch. You got emotionally involved (deeply) when I never really gave much of a fuck except to repeatedly state "anybody but Hillary." That is and was my only real position. No link you were ever going to post, no condescending characterization of Trump or his supporters, no picture of Doobie Johnson's drowsy face was ever going to change my mind. And still won't. Well, maybe. If you find that picture of Trump actually eating live babies or if you get a signed note from Jesus or Moses saying I should vote for somebody else, then maybe. Otherwise I'm pretty much entrenched.
I'm sorry you couldn't get anybody on your wagon.
Say, will I have to post a link for that poll? Because if I do I'm not going to bother running it.
I will just borrow this one:
(http://db-engines.com/pictures/category_ranking_2014_01.png)
Just make all the dates 2016. I am wide column stores, you are object oriented dbms, Dallas is relational dbms.
I guess you "win" since you typed all that shit, and I don't care enough to respond to your idiocy.
Look at how much I'm "taking it way too seriously" compared to him, everybody.
-
The gays love him though!
-
When everybody thinks you have a problem but you? Hmmmm.
Chopper...whipped my ass? He couldn't even reach me. It is to laugh.
For what it's worth C'zad (and for the millionth time) I've not insulted you in this thread or any other. Still haven't. Not gonna. That's something else everybody else sees but you. Him I insulted. But I don't do that any more.
Your feelings are hurt because you think you're laying the wood to me when I'm merely toying with the entire thing for the sport of it. You expect huzzahs!! for your magnificent skill in slicing and dicing little ole me with your Clintonian intelligence. Except you're not doing it. You're not getting it. All the links and the big long multi-quote responses (that I doled right back, bad on me...) just made you look churlish and irrational. Whatever point you may have had was lost in the tantrum. Lost on me and pretty much everybody else.
Quite honestly, I feel badly for you. I actually like you from what I know of you and think you make a rational case in most instances. You're a good ally when you're on the same page with me or whoever. Here though? You just fell completely off the beam and as your old pal chopper used to say "crapped your slacks..." It was difficult to watch. You got emotionally involved (deeply) when I never really gave much of a fuck except to repeatedly state "anybody but Hillary." That is and was my only real position. No link you were ever going to post, no condescending characterization of Trump or his supporters, no picture of Doobie Johnson's drowsy face was ever going to change my mind. And still won't. Well, maybe. If you find that picture of Trump actually eating live babies or if you get a signed note from Jesus or Moses saying I should vote for somebody else, then maybe. Otherwise I'm pretty much entrenched.
I'm sorry you couldn't get anybody on your wagon.
Say, will I have to post a link for that poll? Because if I do I'm not going to bother running it.
I will just borrow this one:
(http://db-engines.com/pictures/category_ranking_2014_01.png)
Just make all the dates 2016. I am wide column stores, you are object oriented dbms, Dallas is relational dbms.
Steady and strong is I.
-
Ewwww! I call Graph DBMS!! Called it first.
Hey, wait....that's not an acronym for Graph Dumbass, is it?
-
#BernieRules
#EveryoneElseDrools
-
#BernieRules
#EveryoneElseDrools
Welcome back. How was prison?
Lots of sex again?
-
#BernieRules
#EveryoneElseDrools
Do you not like Crooked Bank and Saudi Bought Hillary?
-
Saw a great post from Dennis Miller that said " think everyone is missing the point here...Hillary will be elected President because she shrieked "What difference does it make!" Not in spite of...BECAUSE of. You get what's happened, right?".
-
Saw a great post from Dennis Miller that said " think everyone is missing the point here...Hillary will be elected President because she shrieked "What difference does it make!" Not in spite of...BECAUSE of. You get what's happened, right?".
The military won't trust her, I am guessing a lot of upper folk start retiring after she wins.
May be can have our first LBGT transgender cross dressing General. Go merica.
-
May be can have our first LBGT transgender cross dressing General. Go merica.
Please be Army, please be Army, please be Army.
-
Please be Army, please be Army, please be Army.
I was thinking Navy, with all the semen and such.
-
I was thinking Navy, with all the semen and such.
Yeah, but we like the Chief. You? Not so much.
-
https://youtu.be/QZsDKyon67Y
-
Please be Army, please be Army, please be Army.
Thought it already was.
-
Thought it already was.
Air Force beat em to it.
-
Yeah, but we like the Chief. You? Not so much.
I can understand why you like chief, you guys needing rides and such everywhere you go.
-
The U.S. Armed Forces. Sprinkled with gay.
-
I can understand why you like chief, you guys needing rides and such everywhere you go.
My
Ass
Rides
In
Navy
Equipment
-
The U.S. Armed Forces. Sprinkled with gay.
Makes me glad I am no longer serving, cause now I would have to get served. :homo: :fag:
Wonder if they would hate me too? :facepalm:
-
And the winner is...... http://popularmilitary.com/us-army-allowing-first-openly-transgender-infantryman-stay/
-
And the winner is...... http://popularmilitary.com/us-army-allowing-first-openly-transgender-infantryman-stay/
And this:
http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/local/military/article86283492.html
-
And the winner is...... http://popularmilitary.com/us-army-allowing-first-openly-transgender-infantryman-stay/
But that:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/29/air-force-stands-pat-as-marines-set-to-change-titles-to-replace-man.html
-
But that:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/06/29/air-force-stands-pat-as-marines-set-to-change-titles-to-replace-man.html
Yea I was pretty disappointed to see this. Chesty is not pleased.
-
Wonder why nothing will ever happen to Hill no matter how corrupt she is? From abc15.com
PHOENIX - Amid an ongoing investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of email and hours before the public release of the Benghazi report, US Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with former President Bill Clinton.
The private meeting took place on the west side of Sky Harbor International Airport on board a parked private plane.
Former President Clinton was visiting the Phoenix area and arrived to Sky Harbor Monday evening to depart.
Sources tell ABC15 Clinton was notified Lynch would be arriving at the airport soon and waited for her arrival.
Lynch was arriving in Phoenix for a planned visit as part of her national tour to promote community policing.
ABC15 asked Lynch about the meeting during her news conference at the Phoenix Police Department.
"I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane," said Lynch.
The private meeting comes as Lynch's office is in charge of the ongoing investigation and potential charges involving Clinton's email server.
The private meeting also occurred hours before the Benghazi report was released publicly involving Hillary Clinton and President Obama's administration.
Lynch said the private meeting on the tarmac did not involve these topics.
"Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social about our travels and he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix," said Lynch Tuesday afternoon while speaking at the Phoenix Police Department.
Sources say the private meeting at the airport lasted around 30 minutes.
"There was no discussion on any matter pending before the Department or any matter pending with any other body, there was no discussion of Benghazi, no discussion of State Department emails, by way of example I would say it was current news of the day, the Brexit decision and what it would mean," she said.
Yeeeeeeaahh....Oooookaaayyyyy.
-
Wonder why nothing will ever happen to Hill no matter how corrupt she is? From abc15.com
PHOENIX - Amid an ongoing investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of email and hours before the public release of the Benghazi report, US Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with former President Bill Clinton.
The private meeting took place on the west side of Sky Harbor International Airport on board a parked private plane.
Former President Clinton was visiting the Phoenix area and arrived to Sky Harbor Monday evening to depart.
Sources tell ABC15 Clinton was notified Lynch would be arriving at the airport soon and waited for her arrival.
Lynch was arriving in Phoenix for a planned visit as part of her national tour to promote community policing.
ABC15 asked Lynch about the meeting during her news conference at the Phoenix Police Department.
"I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane," said Lynch.
The private meeting comes as Lynch's office is in charge of the ongoing investigation and potential charges involving Clinton's email server.
The private meeting also occurred hours before the Benghazi report was released publicly involving Hillary Clinton and President Obama's administration.
Lynch said the private meeting on the tarmac did not involve these topics.
"Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social about our travels and he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix," said Lynch Tuesday afternoon while speaking at the Phoenix Police Department.
Sources say the private meeting at the airport lasted around 30 minutes.
"There was no discussion on any matter pending before the Department or any matter pending with any other body, there was no discussion of Benghazi, no discussion of State Department emails, by way of example I would say it was current news of the day, the Brexit decision and what it would mean," she said.
Yeeeeeeaahh....Oooookaaayyyyy.
Slick Willie: "Loretta, I know that you have 6 beautiful grandchildren. I sure would hate to see anything bad happen to them. Let's see if we can get this Benghazi thing cleaned up swiftly, o.k.?"
Loretta: "Yes Mr. President. It's just a matter of formality and going through some motions to ensure that the public believes that we investigate this thing. We know that everything is above board with Hillary's actions."
-
Wonder why nothing will ever happen to Hill no matter how corrupt she is? From abc15.com
PHOENIX - Amid an ongoing investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of email and hours before the public release of the Benghazi report, US Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with former President Bill Clinton.
The private meeting took place on the west side of Sky Harbor International Airport on board a parked private plane.
Former President Clinton was visiting the Phoenix area and arrived to Sky Harbor Monday evening to depart.
Sources tell ABC15 Clinton was notified Lynch would be arriving at the airport soon and waited for her arrival.
Lynch was arriving in Phoenix for a planned visit as part of her national tour to promote community policing.
ABC15 asked Lynch about the meeting during her news conference at the Phoenix Police Department.
"I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane," said Lynch.
The private meeting comes as Lynch's office is in charge of the ongoing investigation and potential charges involving Clinton's email server.
The private meeting also occurred hours before the Benghazi report was released publicly involving Hillary Clinton and President Obama's administration.
Lynch said the private meeting on the tarmac did not involve these topics.
"Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social about our travels and he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix," said Lynch Tuesday afternoon while speaking at the Phoenix Police Department.
Sources say the private meeting at the airport lasted around 30 minutes.
"There was no discussion on any matter pending before the Department or any matter pending with any other body, there was no discussion of Benghazi, no discussion of State Department emails, by way of example I would say it was current news of the day, the Brexit decision and what it would mean," she said.
Yeeeeeeaahh....Oooookaaayyyyy.
As many in the legal profession have chimed in with already (and you know as well), serious ethics and conflict of interest issues there. Doesn't matter that subject discussed. It should have been disclosed if it was innocent. But they didn't. It was hidden. Lynch should remove herself from anything involving this case now.
-
As many in the legal profession have chimed in with already (and you know as well), serious ethics and conflict of interest issues there. Doesn't matter that subject discussed. It should have been disclosed if it was innocent. But they didn't. It was hidden. Lynch should remove herself from anything involving this case now.
Won't happen. The Clinton's are a machine. It really needs to be stopped.
-
And the winner is...... http://popularmilitary.com/us-army-allowing-first-openly-transgender-infantryman-stay/
Guess they better change the job title to "Infantrything"
And gives a whole new meaning to, "Battle Dress Uniform" :facepalm:
(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u1/miked0003/th4_zpsrqre4qom.jpg) (http://s164.photobucket.com/user/miked0003/media/th4_zpsrqre4qom.jpg.html)
-
Guys, the US Attorney General can't fly to Arizona on taxpayer jet just to share kid photos with the husband of an investigation target? I thought this was America!
-
Guys, the US Attorney General can't fly to Arizona on taxpayer jet just to share kid photos with the husband of an investigation target? I thought this was America!
They just happened to be there at the same time. Nothing to see here.
-
They just happened to be there at the same time. Nothing to see here.
Barry goes to Hawaii all the time just to visit "pops".
-
I have never been one of those people that believed there was a fix in... Until now.
They fact that the DOJ outright said "that if it were other people they may punish them" tells me everything I need to know.
This country is so fucked. There is not one branch of government that has enough scruples to keep any other branch in check.
-
Totally agree, Sani.
-
This country is so fucked.
Correct.
-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/
-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/05/hillary-clintons-email-problems-might-be-even-worse-than-we-thought/
And the sad part is, voters either don't give a shit, and will vote for her, or look at Trump and think he's a viable alternative.
-
And the sad part is, voters either don't give a shit, and will vote for her, or look at Trump and think he's a viable alternative.
If Rubio or Kasich or Cruz or Bush or Paul or Fiorina or Christie or any non-complete-clown was running against her this would be fucking over and done with.
-
If Rubio or Kasich or Cruz or Bush or Paul or Fiorina or Christie or any non-complete-clown was running against her this would be fucking over and done with.
And I'm not gonna rehash this with some of my fellow "right wingers" on the board but yes, I agree. Which is why I supported who I did as the race unfolded and the field was whittled down. And to a degree it's just conjecture to speculate. But the same hypothetical polls before the race was sewn up pretty much line up with what they say now in general. The ones you mentioned all did better hypothetically which is all we can go on at this point. I can't prove they would have won but I would have liked my chances better with Rubio, Cruz, Paul or kasich.
-
If Rubio or Kasich or Cruz or Bush or Paul or Fiorina or Christie or any non-complete-clown was running against her this would be fucking over and done with.
Of all the stupid things I've seen here, repeating this nonsense may be the stupidest.
Trump destroyed all of them in the primaries. They couldn't even beat HIM, for God's sake. They couldn't come close to beating him. Rubio couldn't win his home fucking state. Cruz won Texas but nothing else out there. Kasich? Fuck almighty.
If Trump wiped off his shoes with these clowns, the evil bitch would have excoriated them. She's got more money, more time in the trenches and more blood on her hands than the rest of them combined. A traditional Republican campaign with a Romney/McCain doppelganger wasn't going to derail the Euro-Express.
There's no indication whatsoever than some after-the-fact gonzo "poll" that any of them would be in better shape.
I'm willing to bet that if any of them -- hell, the entire lot of them all as co-presidents -- were on the Republican side you'd be looking at a 70-30 Clinton lead at the moment.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbkS26PX4rc
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbkS26PX4rc
Dude this one really rubs me wrong. More so than I thought it would. Gross negligence. Aka extreme carelessness per Comey. This is just sickening. It's like we joke about the Teflon Clintons but shit, it's 100% true and I don't know how anyone can support this woman. We're talking classified freaking emails. Extreme carelessness. Lying. F me. I give up.
-
This says it all.
-
Dude this one really rubs me wrong. More so than I thought it would. Gross negligence. Aka extreme carelessness per Comey. This is just sickening. It's like we joke about the Teflon Clintons but shit, it's 100% true and I don't know how anyone can support this woman. We're talking classified freaking emails. Extreme carelessness. Lying. F me. I give up.
But, but, but, but .... Trump had a 6 point star on a graphic. That's the real issue!
We're fucked.
-
Dude this one really rubs me wrong. More so than I thought it would. Gross negligence. Aka extreme carelessness per Comey. This is just sickening. It's like we joke about the Teflon Clintons but shit, it's 100% true and I don't know how anyone can support this woman. We're talking classified freaking emails. Extreme carelessness. Lying. F me. I give up.
Every bit of this. A week after her husband has an impromptu meeting on a private plane with the AG to talk about golf and grandchildren.
This is far more of a joke than anything Trump has ever said or done. Time to stop this farce. Honestly can't think of a more corrupt politician at this level in my lifetime. Maybe her husband getting Whitehouse blow jobs, but then...that's not really political corruption now is it? Just getting your dick sucked by someone other than the First Lady while POTUS.
We're fucked!!!!
-
This is all you need to know
(http://static.westernjournalism.com/thepoint/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Hillary-Clinton.gif)
=
(http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/u/us_bama1.gif)
-
My breakfast didn't taste nearly as good coming up as it did going down.
-
My breakfast didn't taste nearly as good coming up as it did going down.
In lieu of buying the Gotham frying pans you should buy the Clintons cause ain't nothing sticking to them.
-
According to this anonymous FBI agent involved in the investigation, the Clinton Foundation (which implicates hundreds of people) is the real story behind the email scandal. Another thing to note is the Romanian hacker that came forward about the emails has supposedly been found dead in his Virginia jail cell of apparent suicide.
http://christiantimesnewspaper.com/breaking-romanian-hacker-with-access-to-clinton-emails-found-dead-in-jail-cell/
Please read the forum exchanges involving the FBI agent in the below. Interesting if true.
"I'm the person with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case."
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/79480356/ama-about-the-clinton-case
-
Anyone that is surprised by any of this obviously has never visited the great state of Ark can Saw.
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/p/circle-of-death-richmond-odom/1000383156/2699289022742?st=PLA&sid=BNB_DRS_Marketplace+Shopping+Books_00000000&2sid=Google_&sourceId=PLGoP1948&k_clickid=3x1948 (http://www.barnesandnoble.com/p/circle-of-death-richmond-odom/1000383156/2699289022742?st=PLA&sid=BNB_DRS_Marketplace+Shopping+Books_00000000&2sid=Google_&sourceId=PLGoP1948&k_clickid=3x1948)
-
Anyone that is surprised by any of this obviously has never visited the great state of Ark can Saw.
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/p/circle-of-death-richmond-odom/1000383156/2699289022742?st=PLA&sid=BNB_DRS_Marketplace+Shopping+Books_00000000&2sid=Google_&sourceId=PLGoP1948&k_clickid=3x1948 (http://www.barnesandnoble.com/p/circle-of-death-richmond-odom/1000383156/2699289022742?st=PLA&sid=BNB_DRS_Marketplace+Shopping+Books_00000000&2sid=Google_&sourceId=PLGoP1948&k_clickid=3x1948)
Or check out that new book "crisis of character" by mr Byrne that came out last week. I believe kaos mentioned it in another thread. It's mind blowing.
-
.
-
(http://www.redstate.com/uploads/2016/07/ScrewYouamerica.jpg)
-
Or check out that new book "crisis of character" by mr Byrne that came out last week. I believe kaos mentioned it in another thread. It's mind blowing.
Was in BN tonight. Looked for that book. Guess what? Nowhere to be found. At least not easily. It was not on display.
But there were books about how Trump is an asshole. How the republicans have f**cked America (yes, there in the title), the truth about trump....
But can't find diddly in the liar whore.
-
One could easily fill a library with books detailing the exploits of the Clinton crime syndicate, but everyone is choosing to ignore that very large and extremely dangerous elephant in the room for some reason.
-
One could easily fill a library with books detailing the exploits of the Clinton crime syndicate, but everyone is choosing to ignore that very large and extremely dangerous elephant in the room for some reason.
Why the hell are you talking about that? Trump said something dumb. Focus man. Focus.
-
Foxynewsdot I am a gay twerker that has no balls!!!! I also have no idea how to use the quote function to post stories, so I annoy the piss out of others. I like male genatalia in and around my mouth.
Looks like there will at least be some heat put on. Ouch!!!
House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz charged Thursday that the FBI’s decision not to pursue charges against Hillary Clinton despite her mishandling of classified information represents a “double standard,†as he kicked off a highly anticipated hearing with FBI Director James Comey.
Chaffetz, R-Utah, said he was “mystified†by the FBI conclusion not to recommend prosecution.
“It seems to a lot of us that the average Joe … if they had done what you laid out in your statement, that they’d be in handcuffs,†Chaffetz said. “And I think there is a legitimate concern that there is a double-standard -- if your name isn’t Clinton or you’re not part of the powerful elite, that lady justice will act differently.â€
Chaffetz voiced concern that there “does seem to be no consequence.â€
Comey is about to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, just two days after the FBI announcement.
The hearing comes as Republicans turn up the pressure on both Comey and Clinton in the wake of the FBI recommendation not to pursue charges in the email case. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, after receiving Comey’s recommendation, on Wednesday declared the investigation over with no criminal charges issued.
-
https://twitter.com/mmurraypolitics/status/751062574729396225
Comey says the Petraeus incident sets prosecution standard -- knowingly and willfully mishandling classified info. And lying about it
How in the actual fuck can you conclude that Clinton didn't knowingly and willfully mishandle classified info:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cmn54K2WgAAW6ds.jpg)
Or lie about it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbkS26PX4rc
-
In Comey's testimony this morning, he basically said they didn't prosecute because she didn't lie to the FBI. But he then acknowledged that virtually everything she told the public was in fact, a pack of lies.
Just amazing. And no one gives two fiddle fucks about it. This is just a Republican witch hunt.
-
In Comey's testimony this morning, he basically said they didn't prosecute because she didn't lie to the FBI. But he then acknowledged that virtually everything she told the public was in fact, a pack of lies.
Just amazing. And no one gives two fiddle fucks about it. This is just a Republican witch hunt.
Asking why Hillary isn't being held to the same standard as some low-level lackey is just "political theater".
Unlike the Democrats when they sat criss-cross-applesauce style on the house floor, ordered pizzas and sang "We Shall Overcome" to pass bills that clearly violated the 2nd, 4th, & 5th amendment.
-
I really don't even know what to do any longer. I wish I could say that any of this has surprised me but it has not.
-
So surprising nobody the democratic party are a bunch of racists that cannot secure a server....Maybe they should have sent the emails to the Clintons.....They know how to hit the delete button.
http://www.voanews.com/content/us-democrats-convention-hillary-clinton-presidential-nomination/3432682.html
-
I admit, I giggled at this Bernie Sanders quote for several reasons.
"Debbie Wasserman Schultz has made the right decision for the future of the Democratic Party. While she deserves thanks for her years of service, the party now needs new leadership that will open the doors of the party and welcome in working people and young people. The party leadership must also always remain impartial in the presidential nominating process, something which did not occur in the 2016 race."
-
So Sarah Silverman's twitter feed got hacked by Anonymous and they put this up.....
https://youtu.be/OTMaIX_JPE4
-
So Sarah Silverman's twitter feed got hacked by Anonymous and they put this up.....
https://youtu.be/OTMaIX_JPE4
Anyone with half a brain knows she's evil and corrupt. Anybody with 1/4 of a brain knows that anyone -- anyone (including Trump) -- is a better choice than this.
-
Anyone with half a brain knows she's evil and corrupt. Anybody with 1/4 of a brain knows that anyone -- anyone (including Trump) -- is a better choice than this.
Well you know, except a few on this board...
-
Can you imagine the national furor if there was evidence that Trump's children were involved in rigging a jury?
And yet here is evidence that communications were exchanged with mini-bitch Chelsea Clinton in regard to rigging the panel that was investigating Benghazi. The only place it's reported is Fox.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/06/wired-it-emails-suggest-clinton-aide-stage-managed-benghazi-hearing-questions.html
"We wired it that Menendez would provide an opportunity to address two topics we needed to debunk (her actions/whereabouts on 9/11, and these email from Chris Stevens about moving locations,)" Clinton media gatekeeper Philippe Reines wrote to Chelsea Clinton the morning of the Jan. 23, 2013 hearing.
The entire family is corrupt to the core.
-
Can you imagine the national furor if there was evidence that Trump's children were involved in rigging a jury?
And yet here is evidence that communications were exchanged with mini-bitch Chelsea Clinton in regard to rigging the panel that was investigating Benghazi. The only place it's reported is Fox.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/06/wired-it-emails-suggest-clinton-aide-stage-managed-benghazi-hearing-questions.html
"We wired it that Menendez would provide an opportunity to address two topics we needed to debunk (her actions/whereabouts on 9/11, and these email from Chris Stevens about moving locations,)" Clinton media gatekeeper Philippe Reines wrote to Chelsea Clinton the morning of the Jan. 23, 2013 hearing.
The entire family is corrupt to the core.
Glad she only deleted these yoga and wedding emails.