Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => Signing Day => Topic started by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on December 22, 2008, 10:13:19 PM

Title: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on December 22, 2008, 10:13:19 PM
..especially the resident fucktard that can't seem to understand he challenged me to wait until February without a clue as to when that particular month occurs.

Runswithjuliojismonchin doesn't seem to understand that there are going to be ups and downs right now due to the change, but for some reason doesn't understand that challenging me to tell him our class is a disaster in February has NOTHING to do with the present.  You can have your opinions you fucking turd, you just need to stop calling me out as if you've won something, or some point at this time.  You haven't made a point of fucking anything yet except make yourself look like a complete tool.  We don't even have an OC right now, so how are any recruits, especially offensive ones going to give solid commits?????  Our defense is looking pretty stout already.  Got a few new ones on the radar as well.  It's just .... guess what...  TOO FUCKING EARLY TO KNOW on offense!!!   

Do NOT call me out on what a disaster our recruiting class is until FEBRUARY.  Is THIS hard to understand?  Have an opinion on recruting and recruits...fine...   Calling me out... FUCKING STUPID! 

(http://i44.tinypic.com/o5qog2.gif)

Holy shit, where's the fucking Tylenol... Retards fucking everywhere...


Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on December 22, 2008, 10:37:27 PM
Quote
Pat Dye Field / Signing Day / Re: Eltoro Freeman.....  on: December 17, 2008, 09:02:09 PM 
 
i think i will have much more to brag about in February. AU's class will still be shitty, ours won't. not a big deal. but i'm sure you guys will award some more grillz and pimp cups as you see fit to make up that difference. its a good idea, you guys will need the experience handling moral victories.
 


Still failing to see the important "talk" about recruiting.  Just a the fact that you'll be bragging in February about something you don't have the first idea about, unless you hopped a fucking time machine you're not telling the world about, but being that you're still shooting for that 35K retirement shooting star...chances are you haven't cracked that nugget yet.

Quote
Pat Dye Field / Signing Day / Re: Eltoro Freeman.....  on: December 17, 2008, 11:22:05 AM 

hey, the 09 class is doing just fine. getting better every day, as a matter of fact. these guys will re-sign by February. right, AC1?


He did, right?   One of the few...of the few that might, but he was a pretty big cog in the non-shitty class so far for February...  Fucking idiot.

Quote
Pat Dye Field / War Damn Eagle / Re: Down to 20 recruits and shrinking...  on: December 15, 2008, 11:49:37 AM 

fuck you too. you guys have been ragging on us for YEARS about our fucked up program, so don't get all pissy when the shoe is on the other foot and ours doesn't seem so fucked up anymore. to most rational people, you know that this year is one fucked up train wreck, and Chizik is the caboose and recruiting will be fucked up as well. however, i'm sure Chizik will bring in fifty 7 stars with pimp cups, right AC1? from a rival standpoint, the fuckup that is AU could not have gone better this season, and the future is looking pretty damn bright as well. we are no longer the joke of the SEC, and it feels great. thanks, Jacobs.

I love how you acknowledge that we've HAD years to laugh at your fucking program for a reason...and then laugh at the fact you think you can waltz in and thump your chest after one bad year on us.   ANOTHER example of you predicting the future...fucking sweet....

Quote
Pat Dye Field / War Damn Eagle / Re: Down to 20 recruits and shrinking...  on: December 14, 2008, 09:09:04 PM 
AC1, you still sticking with i don't know what the fuck i'm talking about regarding AU's 09 class will be fucked up due to CTT leaving? a bigass "i told you so" is in order i think


How about a bigass "fuck off".   Not only have you been incorrect about some specific signees already after Chizik went recruiting for ONE FUCKING WEEK, but you still fail to recognize how you'd LOVE to brag in February, and admit that it looks like it might not be the disaster it was shaping up to be when you started thumping your chest and giving hand jobs at the Tuscaloosa PD...


You're a long way from right.  You're a long way from having a fucking clue about anything about February, because that would just be FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE. 

So...lay out your non-cap brick-O-shit style response...it doesn't matter....  You FAIL when it comes to this arguement yet... there is NO verifiable answer one way or the other.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: RWS on December 22, 2008, 10:49:07 PM
haha, this shit really pisses you off, doesn't it? it really doesn't help your argument when you just lost another commit after his in-home with Chizik, plus you still have guys on the fence. again, it is my opinion that AU's 09 recruiting class will be fucked up judging by what is happening now. of course some guys will stay on, and two have even signed their LOI's already. i didn't say every single guy will bolt. but alot of the blue chippers and guys that yall were excited about have gone and i don't think they will come back. its amusing to see just how pissed off you get when somebody has an opinion the negative of yours and your argument isn't working out so well. the only thing Chizik has accomplished so far is two guys who signed in 2007 have signed their LOIs. what is your explanation for Johnson just a few days after his in-home with Chizik saying he will sign with Miami? AU's 09 class is going to be fucked up. its not a big fucking deal. you think if CNS walked out the door right now ours wouldn't be fucked up? it happens when coaching changes happen, especially this close to signing day. of course there is no verifiable answer at this point you fucking moron......thats why its my opinion. a forecast, if you will. an epiphany, whatever you want to call it. just the same way alot of people here just knew hiring Chizik was the end to AU football as you knew it. it was their OPINION. you are a total moron, and if you took your head out of your ass for about 2.7 seconds, you would realize that. my opinion is you will have a fucked up 09 class, and these guys dropping like flies are helping prove me right so far. i didn't see you totally shitting the bed when your fuckbuddy Kaos first said that hiring Franklin was going to be a disaster, or during the season as Franklin helped prove him right. imagine that, somebody giving their opinion on a message board....what a crazy world we live in.

oh, and something i just really felt the need to comment on. AU's defense is not all that stout.

Signed,

Alabama
36-0

Co-Signed,

WVU
34-17
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on December 22, 2008, 11:05:21 PM
OpIne all you want...  but, you even asked already for a "bigass I told you so"... 

I've told you "No."   

You keep calling me out, as if you're winning some kind of award, or you think you've proven something over me...  You said this class would be a disaster in February.  It's NOT a disaster at all right now, but you're working very hard to maintain your bammerism by asserting that it is.  You acknowledge the fact that some "blue chippers" are gone and might not come back.  This is true, but to act as if it's impossible for them to come back, or even be replaced by better suitable candidates under a new coach's scheme, is irresponsible on your part.  Thumping your chest as if it's in the realm of impossible only adds to the dimensia that it is to be a complete fucking idiot bama fan like yourself.

You see, I'm not even upset at this point, more so, just in awe of your inability of grasping why you look like an idiot here, and why you don't seem to be garnering any support for your arguement... yet you campaign on as if you have a following of swelling support here at TigersX.  It's amusing...

I'm sure you'll come up with another triumphant rebutle, but it seriously will only cement what we already know about you scissors... ...and that's not necessarily a good thing for you.

Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on December 22, 2008, 11:09:16 PM
Quote
a forecast, if you will. an epiphany, whatever you want to call it. just the same way alot of people here just knew hiring Chizik was the end to AU football as you knew it. it was their OPINION. you are a total moron, and if you took your head out of your ass for about 2.7 seconds, you would realize that. my opinion is you will have a fucked up 09 class, and these guys dropping like flies are helping prove me right so far. i didn't see you totally shitting the bed when your fuckbuddy Kaos first said that hiring Franklin was going to be a disaster, or during the season as Franklin helped prove him right. imagine that, somebody giving their opinion on a message board....what a crazy world we live in.

 but, you even asked already for a "bigass I told you so"...  Nothing's happened yet.  I can't believe you actually went back and edited your post to add this garbage...  You're non-stop fun.  Like a sand bottomed punching bag...

Quote
oh, and something i just really felt the need to comment on. AU's defense is not all that stout.

Signed,

Alabama
36-0

Co-Signed,

WVU
34-17

I'll take that into consideration.

Signed,
Former Defensive Coordinator and New Iowa State Head Coach.

Coach Paul Rhoads


Great "dig" there scissors... cut us deep with that one... (sarcasm.....)
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: RWS on December 22, 2008, 11:15:29 PM
OpIne all you want...  but, you even asked already for a "bigass I told you so"... 

I've told you "No."   

You keep calling me out, as if you're winning some kind of award, or you think you've proven something over me...  You said this class would be a disaster in February.  It's NOT a disaster at all right now, but you're working very hard to maintain your bammerism by asserting that it is.  You acknowledge the fact that some "blue chippers" are gone and might not come back.  This is true, but to act as if it's impossible for them to come back, or even be replaced by better suitable candidates under a new coach's scheme, is irresponsible on your part.  Thumping your chest as if it's in the realm of impossible only adds to the dimensia that it is to be a complete fucking idiot bama fan like yourself.

You see, I'm not even upset at this point, more so, just in awe of your inability of grasping why you look like an idiot here, and why you don't seem to be garnering any support for your arguement... yet you campaign on as if you have a following of swelling support here at TigersX.  It's amusing...

I'm sure you'll come up with another triumphant rebutle, but it seriously will only cement what we already know about you scissors... ...and that's not necessarily a good thing for you.


my point is it is my opinion that the 09 class will be fucked up due to what we are seeing now. i don't have to wait to February to point that out, nor do i have to wait until February to call you out on your head in the sand approach. you run around screaming "EVERYTHING IS FINE, EVERYTHING IS OK! LALALALALALALLA!" with your hands over your ears. these guys that are leaving are deciding that they do not care what scheme or assistants Chizik is bringing in. if you read their interviews they say their bond was with CTT and his staff and none of them are there now. CTT was a primary reason they committed. don't you think if they were more than likely going to come back or were jut worried over uncertainty of what assistants are coming, they would take the same approach as others and say "you know what, i will wait to see what kind of staff this guy brings in". but you see, they are not. they are saying they don't want AU anymore because CTT is gone, not because of the uncertainty of which assistants will come in. this is something you are not understanding when i'm telling you these guys are not coming back. i call you out about it because you keep screaming everything is ok, as you guys have lost yet another even after an in-home from Chizik.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: RWS on December 22, 2008, 11:17:24 PM
but, you even asked already for a "bigass I told you so"...  Nothing's happened yet.  I can't believe you actually went back and edited your post to add this garbage...  You're non-stop fun.  Like a sand bottomed punching bag...

I'll take that into consideration.

Signed,
Former Defensive Coordinator and New Iowa State Head Coach.

Coach Paul Rhoads


Great "dig" there scissors... cut us deep with that one... (sarcasm.....)
and i will ask again for that big ass i told you so in February as well. again, i didn't see you shitting the bed during the season when Kaos was telling you guys i told you so before the season was over.....it just pisses you off way more when it comes from a rival. if the 08 and 09 AU defense has nothing to do with each other, why did you reference it in saying AU is already stout on defense?
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on December 22, 2008, 11:20:00 PM
Nope... You're trying your weak BG style distraction and throw this into fifteen different tangents methods...

This is actually simple. You've called me out on several times and claimed that you deserved an "i told you so".  You went beyond opinions and predictions and claimed victory while the meat of the army was still bearing down on the faux-victors.

May God have mercy on your clueless bammer soul.   Also, I've never exclaimed anything like the following: "EVERYTHING IS FINE, EVERYTHING IS OK! LALALALALALALLA!"  

Fail.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: RWS on December 22, 2008, 11:22:53 PM
Nope... You're trying your weak BG style distraction and throw this into fifteen different tangents methods...

This is actually simple. You've called me out on several times and claimed that you deserved an "i told you so".  You went beyond opinions and predictions and claimed victory while the meat of the army was still bearing down on the faux-victors.

May God have mercy on your clueless bammer soul.   Also, I've never exclaimed anything like the following: "EVERYTHING IS FINE, EVERYTHING IS OK! LALALALALALALLA!"  

Fail.
hey, that reminds me, you never answered my question from before......what recruits are going to jump back on ship with Chizik and which blue-chippers is he about to get to commit or steal from another school? so far i have a great example to use to say "i told you so", but so far, you don't have shit on the horizon to refute that. if you were having guys that left now jump back on left and right then you would have a great argument. that, however, is not the case. two guys that signed in 2007 have signed LOIs and one former 5-star that signed in 2007 has jumped shipafter his in-home with Chizik. the guys have left because CTT is gone. unless he comes back, i doubt they are coming back.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on December 22, 2008, 11:24:14 PM
and i will ask again for that big ass i told you so in February as well. again, i didn't see you shitting the bed during the season when Kaos was telling you guys i told you so before the season was over.....it just pisses you off way more when it comes from a rival. if the 08 and 09 AU defense has nothing to do with each other, why did you reference it in saying AU is already stout on defense?

You're talking about the success, or lack there of, of a season that is now over.  So, you're right, you didn't see me "shitting the bed", because we took a wait and see approach.  It sucked.  In the end, for many more reasons than just Tony Franklin.  Besides, this is about the current recruiting search, not that subject, so again, you're misdirection method fails again.

Also, the statement about defense, had to do with recruiting on defense.  Since...you know... We were talking about recruiting.  You brought up the season for your own jollies.

So... Fail again.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on December 22, 2008, 11:25:47 PM
hey, that reminds me, you never answered my question from before......what recruits are going to jump back on ship with Chizik and which blue-chippers is he about to get to commit or steal from another school? so far i have a great example to use to say "i told you so", but so far, you don't have shit on the horizon to refute that.

Why?  Can I use your time machine?  I haven't claimed any one way or the other, just simply pointed out, you're claiming victory well over a month before anyone could possibly know.  There's no way to answer that... Besides, recruits wouldn't answer my call any faster than yours.

FAIL.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on December 22, 2008, 11:29:56 PM
Quote
We don't even have an OC right now, so how are any recruits, especially offensive ones going to give solid commits?????  Our defense is looking pretty stout already.  Got a few new ones on the radar as well.  It's just .... guess what...  TOO FUCKING EARLY TO KNOW on offense!!!
   

How do you get that I was talking about last year's defense out of this?  Fucking hilarious....
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: The Prowler on December 22, 2008, 11:35:06 PM
LOUD NOISES!!!!!
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: RWS on December 22, 2008, 11:41:19 PM
You're talking about the success, or lack there of, of a season that is now over.  So, you're right, you didn't see me "shitting the bed", because we took a wait and see approach.  It sucked.  In the end, for many more reasons than just Tony Franklin.  Besides, this is about the current recruiting search, not that subject, so again, you're misdirection method fails again.

Also, the statement about defense, had to do with recruiting on defense.  Since...you know... We were talking about recruiting.  You brought up the season for your own jollies.

So... Fail again.
you're the one that said AU is stout on defense, i assumed you meant current players so you would not need a ton of defensive studs in the 09 class. i was simply pointing out that AU's defense is not stout, and gave proof of that. apparently i didn't see "looking"......sometimes its hard wading through all of your bullshit, so chill out. i know you think your are God's gift to message boards and all, but us mere mortals sometimes miss a word.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on December 22, 2008, 11:51:11 PM
sometimes its hard wading through all of your bullshit, so chill out. 

...says the "block-O-shit" posting style King.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 22, 2008, 11:53:52 PM
TUNAK TUNAK TAN!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZorvKCVl4TM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZorvKCVl4TM)
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: AuburnChopper 3.0 on December 22, 2008, 11:58:22 PM
So when did David Ward leave Bearforce 1 to lead this obomination?  :silence:
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: JohnDeere on December 23, 2008, 09:37:39 AM
haha, this shit really pisses you off, doesn't it? it really doesn't help your argument when you just lost another commit after his in-home with Chizik, plus you still have guys on the fence. again, it is my opinion that AU's 09 recruiting class will be fucked up judging by what is happening now. of course some guys will stay on, and two have even signed their LOI's already. i didn't say every single guy will bolt. but alot of the blue chippers and guys that yall were excited about have gone and i don't think they will come back. its amusing to see just how pissed off you get when somebody has an opinion the negative of yours and your argument isn't working out so well. the only thing Chizik has accomplished so far is two guys who signed in 2007 have signed their LOIs. what is your explanation for Johnson just a few days after his in-home with Chizik saying he will sign with Miami? AU's 09 class is going to be fucked up. its not a big fucking deal. you think if CNS walked out the door right now ours wouldn't be fucked up? it happens when coaching changes happen, especially this close to signing day. of course there is no verifiable answer at this point you fucking moron......thats why its my opinion. a forecast, if you will. an epiphany, whatever you want to call it. just the same way alot of people here just knew hiring Chizik was the end to AU football as you knew it. it was their OPINION. you are a total moron, and if you took your head out of your ass for about 2.7 seconds, you would realize that. my opinion is you will have a fucked up 09 class, and these guys dropping like flies are helping prove me right so far. i didn't see you totally shitting the bed when your fuckbuddy Kaos first said that hiring Franklin was going to be a disaster, or during the season as Franklin helped prove him right. imagine that, somebody giving their opinion on a message board....what a crazy world we live in.


Runswithscissors = clown. He writes like a freaking 5th grader. I gave up reading the post above after one sentence and then I quickly scanned down and noticed he didn't start one sentence with a capital letter. Don't call me the Grammar Nazi or anthing, I use words like "ain't" and "alright" constantly, and I don't know all the rules for using the semicolon, but I use it constantly. RWS writing is a)elementary or b) quickly thrown together in frustraton.

With that said:


Rule 1. Capitalize the first word of a quoted sentence. 
Examples: He said, "Treat her as you would your own daughter."
"Look out!" she screamed. "You almost ran into my child." 
 

Rule 2.  Capitalize a proper noun. 
Example: Golden Gate Bridge 
 

Rule 3. Capitalize a person's title when it precedes the name. Do not capitalize when the title is acting as a description following the name. 
  Examples: Chairperson Petrov
    Ms. Petrov, the chairperson of the company, will address us at noon. 
 

Rule 4. Capitalize the person's title when it follows the name on the address or signature line. 
  Example: Sincerely,

Ms. Haines, Chairperson
 
 

Rule 5. Capitalize the titles of high-ranking government officials when used with or before their names. Do not capitalize the civil title if it is used instead of the name. 
  Examples: The president will address Congress.
    All senators are expected to attend.
    The governors, lieutenant governors, and attorneys general called for a special task force.
    Governor Fortinbrass, Lieutenant Governor Poppins, Attorney General Dalloway, and Senators James and Twain will attend. 
 

Rule 6. Capitalize any title when used as a direct address. 
  Example: Will you take my temperature, Doctor? 
 

Rule 7. Capitalize points of the compass only when they refer to specific regions. 
  Examples: We have had three relatives visit from the South.
    Go south three blocks and then turn left. 
    We live in the southeast section of town.
Southeast is just an adjective here describing section, so it should not be capitalized. 
 

Rule 8. Always capitalize the first and last words of titles of publications regardless of their parts of speech. Capitalize other words within titles, including the short verb forms Is, Are, and Be.
 
  Exception: Do not capitalize little words within titles such as a, an, the, but, as, if, and, or, nor, or prepositions, regardless of their length.
  Examples: The Day of the Jackal 
    What Color Is Your Parachute? 
    A Tale of Two Cities
 

Rule 9. Capitalize federal or state when used as part of an official agency name or in government documents where these terms represent an official name. If they are being used as general terms, you may use lowercase letters. 
  Examples: The state has evidence to the contrary. 
    That is a federal offense. 
    The State Board of Equalization collects sales taxes. 
    We will visit three states during our summer vacation. 
    The Federal Bureau of Investigation has been subject to much scrutiny and criticism lately. 
    Her business must comply with all county, state, and federal laws. 
 

Rule 10. You may capitalize words such as department, bureau, and office if you have prepared your text in the following way: 
  Example: The Bureau of Land Management (Bureau) has some jurisdiction over Indian lands. The Bureau is finding its administrative role to be challenging. 
 

Rule 11. Do not capitalize names of seasons. 
  Example: I love autumn colors and spring flowers. 
 

Rule 12. Capitalize the first word of a salutation and the first word of a complimentary close. 
  Examples: Dear Ms. Mohamed: 
    My dear Mr. Sanchez: 
    Very truly yours, 
 

Rule 13. Capitalize words derived from proper nouns. 
  Example: I must take English and math.
English is capitalized because it comes from the proper noun England, but math does not come from Mathland. 
 

Rule 14. Capitalize the names of specific course titles. 
  Example: I must take history and Algebra 2. 
 

Rule 15. After a sentence ending with a colon, do not capitalize the first word if it begins a list.
  Example: These are my favorite foods: chocolate cake, spaghetti, and artichokes.
 

Rule 16. Do not capitalize when only one sentence follows a sentence ending with a colon.
  Example: I love Jane Smiley's writing: her book, A Thousand Acres, was beautiful.
 

Rule 17. Capitalize when two or more sentences follow a sentence ending with a colon.
  Example: I love Jane Smiley's writing: Her book, A Thousand Acres, was beautiful. Also, Moo was clever. 
 

Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: Snaggletiger on December 23, 2008, 09:59:22 AM
that's one excellent post there mr. Deere.  i think that runswithparticiplesdangling should take notice and learn His grammar more better in the future.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: Buzz Killington on December 23, 2008, 10:14:02 AM
Yall really should leave his grammar out of this.  I mean, we don't even know if she's still living.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: Jumbo on December 23, 2008, 10:41:32 AM
Yall really should leave his grammar out of this.  I mean, we don't even know if she's still living.
grammar shore does love the tawd!
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: RWS on December 23, 2008, 02:19:02 PM
Runswithscissors = clown. He writes like a freaking 5th grader. I gave up reading the post above after one sentence and then I quickly scanned down and noticed he didn't start one sentence with a capital letter. Don't call me the Grammar Nazi or anthing, I use words like "ain't" and "alright" constantly, and I don't know all the rules for using the semicolon, but I use it constantly. RWS writing is a)elementary or b) quickly thrown together in frustraton.

With that said:


Rule 1. Capitalize the first word of a quoted sentence. 
Examples: He said, "Treat her as you would your own daughter."
"Look out!" she screamed. "You almost ran into my child." 
 

Rule 2.  Capitalize a proper noun. 
Example: Golden Gate Bridge 
 

Rule 3. Capitalize a person's title when it precedes the name. Do not capitalize when the title is acting as a description following the name. 
  Examples: Chairperson Petrov
    Ms. Petrov, the chairperson of the company, will address us at noon. 
 

Rule 4. Capitalize the person's title when it follows the name on the address or signature line. 
  Example: Sincerely,

Ms. Haines, Chairperson
 
 

Rule 5. Capitalize the titles of high-ranking government officials when used with or before their names. Do not capitalize the civil title if it is used instead of the name. 
  Examples: The president will address Congress.
    All senators are expected to attend.
    The governors, lieutenant governors, and attorneys general called for a special task force.
    Governor Fortinbrass, Lieutenant Governor Poppins, Attorney General Dalloway, and Senators James and Twain will attend. 
 

Rule 6. Capitalize any title when used as a direct address. 
  Example: Will you take my temperature, Doctor? 
 

Rule 7. Capitalize points of the compass only when they refer to specific regions. 
  Examples: We have had three relatives visit from the South.
    Go south three blocks and then turn left. 
    We live in the southeast section of town.
Southeast is just an adjective here describing section, so it should not be capitalized. 
 

Rule 8. Always capitalize the first and last words of titles of publications regardless of their parts of speech. Capitalize other words within titles, including the short verb forms Is, Are, and Be.
 
  Exception: Do not capitalize little words within titles such as a, an, the, but, as, if, and, or, nor, or prepositions, regardless of their length.
  Examples: The Day of the Jackal 
    What Color Is Your Parachute? 
    A Tale of Two Cities
 

Rule 9. Capitalize federal or state when used as part of an official agency name or in government documents where these terms represent an official name. If they are being used as general terms, you may use lowercase letters. 
  Examples: The state has evidence to the contrary. 
    That is a federal offense. 
    The State Board of Equalization collects sales taxes. 
    We will visit three states during our summer vacation. 
    The Federal Bureau of Investigation has been subject to much scrutiny and criticism lately. 
    Her business must comply with all county, state, and federal laws. 
 

Rule 10. You may capitalize words such as department, bureau, and office if you have prepared your text in the following way: 
  Example: The Bureau of Land Management (Bureau) has some jurisdiction over Indian lands. The Bureau is finding its administrative role to be challenging. 
 

Rule 11. Do not capitalize names of seasons. 
  Example: I love autumn colors and spring flowers. 
 

Rule 12. Capitalize the first word of a salutation and the first word of a complimentary close. 
  Examples: Dear Ms. Mohamed: 
    My dear Mr. Sanchez: 
    Very truly yours, 
 

Rule 13. Capitalize words derived from proper nouns. 
  Example: I must take English and math.
English is capitalized because it comes from the proper noun England, but math does not come from Mathland. 
 

Rule 14. Capitalize the names of specific course titles. 
  Example: I must take history and Algebra 2. 
 

Rule 15. After a sentence ending with a colon, do not capitalize the first word if it begins a list.
  Example: These are my favorite foods: chocolate cake, spaghetti, and artichokes.
 

Rule 16. Do not capitalize when only one sentence follows a sentence ending with a colon.
  Example: I love Jane Smiley's writing: her book, A Thousand Acres, was beautiful.
 

Rule 17. Capitalize when two or more sentences follow a sentence ending with a colon.
  Example: I love Jane Smiley's writing: Her book, A Thousand Acres, was beautiful. Also, Moo was clever. 
 


on a site where talk of anal beads and homo-erotic behavior are the norm, i never thought capitalization would be an issue. i don't capitalize because i really don't feel like it, so fuck you. i knew there was a division of the Message Board Police on AUN to monitor such things, but was unaware of their presence here. you can't even debate the issue at hand, so all you can say is "uh, hey uhhhhhh.....you're not using proper capitalization." now, run along, junior.......adults are talking foosball here.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: Buzz Killington on December 23, 2008, 02:20:34 PM
on a site where talk of anal beads and homo-erotic behavior are the norm, i never thought capitalization would be an issue. i don't capitalize because i really don't feel like it, so fuck you. i knew there was a division of the Message Board Police on AUN to monitor such things, but was unaware of their presence here. you can't even debate the issue at hand, so all you can say is "uh, hey uhhhhhh.....you're not using proper capitalization." now, run along, junior.......adults are talking foosball here.
Geez...fuck you and your nasty old grammar too.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: Saniflush on December 23, 2008, 02:27:03 PM
I love this place!
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: RWS on December 23, 2008, 02:39:30 PM
Geez...fuck you and your nasty old grammar too.
well, you'll have to do something for me first.....
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: Buzz Killington on December 23, 2008, 02:55:49 PM
well, you'll have to do something for me first.....
You want it in the face again, or on the back?
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: RWS on December 23, 2008, 03:03:17 PM
You want it in the face again, or on the back?
first, you're going to have to get that shit checked out. leaves a rash every fucking time, and my fiancee is getting real nosey.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: Snaggletiger on December 23, 2008, 03:25:48 PM
on a site where talk of anal beads and homo-erotic behavior are the norm, i never thought capitalization would be an issue. i don't capitalize because i really don't feel like it, so fuck you. i knew there was a division of the Message Board Police on AUN to monitor such things, but was unaware of their presence here. you can't even debate the issue at hand, so all you can say is "uh, hey uhhhhhh.....you're not using proper capitalization." now, run along, junior.......adults are talking foosball here.

Sooo...you're here because you like anal beads and homo-erotic behavior?

You're sick, man...with a capital S!!!
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: RWS on December 23, 2008, 03:33:48 PM
Sooo...you're here because you like anal beads and homo-erotic behavior?

You're sick, man...with a capital S!!!
when in Rome......
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: Buzz Killington on December 23, 2008, 03:35:18 PM
first, you're going to have to get that shit checked out. leaves a rash every fucking time, and my fiancee is getting real nosey.
I knew that Korean hooker would come back to haunt me one day.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: Snaggletiger on December 23, 2008, 03:43:27 PM
I knew that Korean hooker would come back to haunt me one day.

DOH!!!
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: Saniflush on December 23, 2008, 03:59:37 PM
I knew that Korean hooker would come back to haunt me one day.

You know when dealing with Korean hookers, one should.....never mind.
Title: Re: February Identification Help for Bammers...
Post by: Jumbo on December 24, 2008, 06:00:32 AM
You know when dealing with Korean hookers, one should.....never mind.
That was the best story ever!!!!!!!