Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

What would it take?

wesfau2

  • ***
  • 13581
  • I love it when you call me Big Poppa
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #100 on: April 18, 2024, 06:59:15 PM »
Meanwhile, at two separate functions yesterday, our Pedophile in Chief, told audiences that his Uncle was shot down in WW2 but was never found because there were cannibals in the area. Holy shit!

Clutch the pearls!

I'll be over here.  Watching the criminal be tried for crimes.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You can keep a wooden stake in your trunk
On the off-chance that the fairy tales ain't bunk
And Imma keep a bottle of that funk
To get motel parking lot, balcony crunk.

Re: What would it take?
« Reply #101 on: April 18, 2024, 07:59:55 PM »
Clutch the pearls!

I'll be over here.  Watching the criminal be tried for crimes.

Who are you voting for in the upcoming presidential election?

If you’re consistent with your convictions, I’d assume it would be Robert F’n A Kennedy in this cycle. He seems to have the best character/integrity of the bunch… and he’s mostly liberal. But the good, classical kind.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Don't rush me, sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.

Kaos

  • *
  • 29122
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #102 on: April 18, 2024, 08:14:02 PM »
Clutch the pearls!

I'll be over here.  Watching the criminal be tried for crimes.

Lawyer 101. 

Not criminal. 

Meanwhile the real criminals continue to cavort in Washington.  You should be leading the charge to bring them down. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

wesfau2

  • ***
  • 13581
  • I love it when you call me Big Poppa
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #103 on: April 19, 2024, 08:04:52 AM »
Who are you voting for in the upcoming presidential election?

If you’re consistent with your convictions, I’d assume it would be Robert F’n A Kennedy in this cycle. He seems to have the best character/integrity of the bunch… and he’s mostly liberal. But the good, classical kind.

Kennedy is a conspiracy-endorsing whack job.

Given our options, it has to be Biden, unfortunately.

friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You can keep a wooden stake in your trunk
On the off-chance that the fairy tales ain't bunk
And Imma keep a bottle of that funk
To get motel parking lot, balcony crunk.

Kaos

  • *
  • 29122
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #104 on: April 19, 2024, 10:28:21 AM »
Kennedy is a conspiracy-endorsing whack job.

Given our options, it has to be Biden, unfortunately.

You've bypassed clown and headed straight to fool.  I pity you and am grateful you live in a state where your vote is a squirt of squirrel pee in the wind. 

I defy you to name one single policy or position this administration endorses that is positive for America. I know you cannot.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2024, 10:31:58 AM by Kaos »
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

Re: What would it take?
« Reply #105 on: April 19, 2024, 11:14:08 AM »
Kennedy is a conspiracy-endorsing whack job.

Given our options, it has to be Biden, unfortunately.


What do you make of his alleged shady business dealings, extreme top cover for his crackhead son, and accusations of molestation by his own daughter?

Accusations = Guilt these days, correct?

I disagree with your above premise, respectfully.

A man with a few conspiracy theories with no accusations of such things against him is a better candidate than an old man who’s brain barely functions and that has a lot of smoke around him doing criminal things in his uneventful/unimpressive history in politics. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Don't rush me, sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.

wesfau2

  • ***
  • 13581
  • I love it when you call me Big Poppa
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #106 on: April 19, 2024, 11:48:21 AM »

What do you make of his alleged shady business dealings

The dipshit maga caucus has been chasing this garbage for a couple of years now.  So far: bupkus.  There's not a shred of evidence of wrongdoing.

Quote
extreme top cover for his crackhead son

Not sure what "extreme top cover" is, but I'm not going to fault someone for doing what they can (within the bounds of the law) to help/protect their kid, addict or not. 

Quote
, and accusations of molestation by his own daughter?

This is a new one on me. 

Quote
Accusations = Guilt these days, correct?

I disagree with your above premise, respectfully.

A man with a few conspiracy theories with no accusations of such things against him is a better candidate than an old man who’s brain barely functions and that has a lot of smoke around him doing criminal things in his uneventful/unimpressive history in politics.

Obvs the disagreeing with respect to all this.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You can keep a wooden stake in your trunk
On the off-chance that the fairy tales ain't bunk
And Imma keep a bottle of that funk
To get motel parking lot, balcony crunk.

Re: What would it take?
« Reply #107 on: April 19, 2024, 01:49:56 PM »
The dipshit maga caucus has been chasing this garbage for a couple of years now.  So far: bupkus.  There's not a shred of evidence of wrongdoing.

Yet, you were on board the Russian collusion train, which was proven as false.  I'll never forget the debate where Hillary brought that up and he looked legitimately confused about it.  Dirty politics.

Not a Trump fan, but some consistency would be pretty righteous here.

Not sure what "extreme top cover" is, but I'm not going to fault someone for doing what they can (within the bounds of the law) to help/protect their kid, addict or not.

I don't fault a parent protecting their child either, within the bounds of the law.  The issues with the laptop & favorable conditions/policies with Bank of America are worth taking a look at as a starting point.

This is a new one on me.
 

The diary has not been proven or disproven, but the details of the diary were sent with legitimate tax documents.  Smoke & fire and all that.

Obvs the disagreeing with respect to all this.

I think you are incredibly intelligent.  However, when it comes to politics, I don't understand your lock-step nature with everything perpetuated by media propaganda. Can you give me policies from the DNC that you disagree with?  Any of 'em?
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Don't rush me, sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.

wesfau2

  • ***
  • 13581
  • I love it when you call me Big Poppa
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #108 on: April 19, 2024, 02:08:20 PM »
Yet, you were on board the Russian collusion train, which was proven as false. 

No.  It was not.  I keep hearing that around here, but it is patently untrue.

Quote
I don't fault a parent protecting their child either, within the bounds of the law.  The issues with the laptop & favorable conditions/policies with Bank of America are worth taking a look at as a starting point.

The laptop business has such a fucking flawed foundation as to be nonsense.  The chain of custody is beyond fucked.  As to the favorable banking...what do you think margie and her drooling cohorts have been digging at the past two years?  They have found...nothing.  Not a single fucking thing.

Quote
  The diary has not been proven or disproven, but the details of the diary were sent with legitimate tax documents.  Smoke & fire and all that.

Eh...if there was a story here, the Rs would be all over it, 24/7.  I'm open to hearing more, but I'm going in skeptical.

Quote
I think you are incredibly intelligent.  However, when it comes to politics, I don't understand your lock-step nature with everything perpetuated by media propaganda. Can you give me policies from the DNC that you disagree with?  Any of 'em?

At this point it's an existential question of whether our attempt at democracy lives or dies.  It's an unfortunate binary choice.  I dislike much of our foreign policy.  I think the DNC is too mealy mouthed when they could take stronger positions that are demonstrably popular.  That said, a second Trump term would be disastrous in ways that I don't think people are willing to admit are possible.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You can keep a wooden stake in your trunk
On the off-chance that the fairy tales ain't bunk
And Imma keep a bottle of that funk
To get motel parking lot, balcony crunk.

Snaggletiger

  • *
  • 44013
  • My Fighting Pearls
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #109 on: April 19, 2024, 02:11:47 PM »
None of it matters.  Biden started the beginning of the end by opening the borders and allowing an estimated 10+ million illegal immigrants to enter the country. A total greater than the population of 40 states.  From rampant fentanyl and drug deaths, to child trafficking, to multiple murders, (Laken Riley says Hi, Joe) savage beating of New York cops, and on and on and on.  It's just getting started, and the estimates of actual terrorists who have crossed our borders is staggering. A lot of people are going to die.

Joe Biden and Alejandro Mayorkas, along with twit brained, Karine Jean-Pierre told us for 3 years the border was secure.  Now, in a campaign year, Biden proclaims the border would be secure, "If it weren't for MAGA Republicans".

This, more than anything else, is why he needs to be in jail.  He won't, but it will be his greatest legacy.  It's on him. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
My doctor told me I needed to stop masturbating.  I asked him why, and he said, "because I'm trying to examine you."

wesfau2

  • ***
  • 13581
  • I love it when you call me Big Poppa
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #110 on: April 19, 2024, 02:14:58 PM »
None of it matters.  Biden started the beginning of the end by opening the borders and allowing an estimated 10+ million illegal immigrants to enter the country. A total greater than the population of 40 states.  From rampant fentanyl and drug deaths, to child trafficking, to multiple murders, (Laken Riley says Hi, Joe) savage beating of New York cops, and on and on and on.  It's just getting started, and the estimates of actual terrorists who have crossed our borders is staggering. A lot of people are going to die.

Joe Biden and Alejandro Mayorkas, along with twit brained, Karine Jean-Pierre told us for 3 years the border was secure.  Now, in a campaign year, Biden proclaims the border would be secure, "If it weren't for MAGA Republicans".

This, more than anything else, is why he needs to be in jail.  He won't, but it will be his greatest legacy.  It's on him.

There was a bipartisan border security bill...Trump sabotaged it for political points.  This isn't a Biden problem.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You can keep a wooden stake in your trunk
On the off-chance that the fairy tales ain't bunk
And Imma keep a bottle of that funk
To get motel parking lot, balcony crunk.

Snaggletiger

  • *
  • 44013
  • My Fighting Pearls
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #111 on: April 19, 2024, 02:27:33 PM »
There was a bipartisan border security bill...Trump sabotaged it for political points.  This isn't a Biden problem.

Nope. Can't spin this one.  100% on Biden.  The bill was shot sown in part, because it didn't address the immigration problem, other than limiting the number of illegals who could come every year. And that number is in the millions. News flash.  That bill was this year.  The 10 million are already here and the damage and deaths are just beginning.  This is Joe's and Joe's alone, and it will turn out to be the worst crisis this country has ever faced.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
My doctor told me I needed to stop masturbating.  I asked him why, and he said, "because I'm trying to examine you."

Snaggletiger

  • *
  • 44013
  • My Fighting Pearls
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #112 on: April 19, 2024, 02:31:13 PM »
No.  It was not.  I keep hearing that around here, but it is patently untrue.


From that shining beacon in the night of unbiased reporting, NPR

Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction
MARCH 24, 201910:52 AM ET
By

Carrie Johnson

,

Philip Ewing

,

Jessica Taylor


Special counsel Robert Mueller did not find evidence that President Trump's campaign conspired with Russia to influence the 2016 election, according to a summary of findings submitted to Congress by Attorney General William Barr.

"The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election," Barr wrote in a letter to leaders of the House and Senate judiciary committees on Sunday afternoon.

That was despite "multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign," he wrote.
However, Mueller's investigation did not take a position on whether Trump obstructed justice by trying to frustrate the ongoing investigation.

"[W]hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," Barr quotes from Mueller's report.

The attorney general wrote that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had concluded that the findings of the special counsel were "not sufficient to establish that the president committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."

The Justice Department leaders reached that conclusion, Barr wrote, without regard to the "constitutional considerations" that surround whether the department can seek an indictment of a sitting president.

White House exults

Trump talked with reporters as he prepared to return from Florida to the White House, calling the investigation "an illegal take-down that failed."

"It was just announced there was no collusion with Russia, the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. There was no obstruction, and it was a complete and total exoneration," Trump said before boarding Air Force One. "It's a shame our country had to go through this, and to be honest, it's a shame your president had to go through this."

Trump also said: "Hopefully someone's going to look at the other side," seeming to revive suggestions that he wanted an investigation into his 2016 Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton, which he has called for several times.

friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
My doctor told me I needed to stop masturbating.  I asked him why, and he said, "because I'm trying to examine you."

WiregrassTiger

  • *
  • 12055
  • Don't touch Tappy, he's a service tiger.
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #113 on: April 19, 2024, 02:41:19 PM »
America knows that the #BidenBorderCrisis is real. We just don’t know how many. Estimates are 8-10 million since he took office.

And they anre not all roofers.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Like my posts on www.tigersx.com

wesfau2

  • ***
  • 13581
  • I love it when you call me Big Poppa
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #114 on: April 19, 2024, 02:50:31 PM »
From that shining beacon in the night of unbiased reporting, NPR

Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction
MARCH 24, 201910:52 AM ET
By

Carrie Johnson

,

Philip Ewing

,

Jessica Taylor


Special counsel Robert Mueller did not find evidence that President Trump's campaign conspired with Russia to influence the 2016 election, according to a summary of findings submitted to Congress by Attorney General William Barr.

"The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election," Barr wrote in a letter to leaders of the House and Senate judiciary committees on Sunday afternoon.

That was despite "multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign," he wrote.
However, Mueller's investigation did not take a position on whether Trump obstructed justice by trying to frustrate the ongoing investigation.

"[W]hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," Barr quotes from Mueller's report.

The attorney general wrote that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had concluded that the findings of the special counsel were "not sufficient to establish that the president committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."

The Justice Department leaders reached that conclusion, Barr wrote, without regard to the "constitutional considerations" that surround whether the department can seek an indictment of a sitting president.

White House exults

Trump talked with reporters as he prepared to return from Florida to the White House, calling the investigation "an illegal take-down that failed."

"It was just announced there was no collusion with Russia, the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. There was no obstruction, and it was a complete and total exoneration," Trump said before boarding Air Force One. "It's a shame our country had to go through this, and to be honest, it's a shame your president had to go through this."

Trump also said: "Hopefully someone's going to look at the other side," seeming to revive suggestions that he wanted an investigation into his 2016 Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton, which he has called for several times.

Asked if he found evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow, Mueller said his team avoided the term “collusion” because it had no legal application. Mueller acknowledged there was insufficient evidence to establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russians, but he said it would not be accurate to suggest there was no evidence of coordination....

Under oath, Mueller said:


The Russians had led a campaign to swing the 2016 election in Trump’s favor and committed crimes to achieve that goal; The Trump campaign was receptive to help from the Russians; Donald Trump Jr said he would “love” to receive dirt on Hillary Clinton from the Russian government; As a candidate, Trump publicly urged the Russians to hack Clinton’s emails; Trump pursued a lucrative Trump Tower project in Moscow during the campaign; Multiple top Trump campaign and administration officials were convicted of lying to investigators about their contacts with Russians


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jul/24/robert-mueller-testimony-key-takeaways-exoneration-indictment
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You can keep a wooden stake in your trunk
On the off-chance that the fairy tales ain't bunk
And Imma keep a bottle of that funk
To get motel parking lot, balcony crunk.

WiregrassTiger

  • *
  • 12055
  • Don't touch Tappy, he's a service tiger.
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #115 on: April 19, 2024, 04:03:19 PM »
No.  It was not.  I keep hearing that around here, but it is patently untrue.

The laptop business has such a fucking flawed foundation as to be nonsense.  The chain of custody is beyond fucked.  As to the favorable banking...what do you think margie and her drooling cohorts have been digging at the past two years?  They have found...nothing.  Not a single fucking thing.

Eh...if there was a story here, the Rs would be all over it, 24/7.  I'm open to hearing more, but I'm going in skeptical.

At this point it's an existential question of whether our attempt at democracy lives or dies.  It's an unfortunate binary.  I dislike much of our foreign policy.  I think the DNC is too mealy mouthed when they could take stronger positions that are demonstrably popular.  That said, a second Trump term would be disastrous in ways that I don't think people are willing to admit are possible.
This part: “ It's an unfortunate binary choice” doesn’t apply to sex, though right?
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Like my posts on www.tigersx.com

Re: What would it take?
« Reply #116 on: April 19, 2024, 04:20:29 PM »
This part: “ It's an unfortunate binary choice” doesn’t apply to sex, though right?

In my house it does! The Snake charmer verifies it daily with the example below:

It’s either…

“Yes, Honey. I want you.”

OR

“Don’t touch me!”


The 2nd one is far more frequent now that she has a bun in the oven.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Don't rush me, sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.

Kaos

  • *
  • 29122
  • Jeez
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #117 on: April 19, 2024, 04:53:38 PM »
The diary has not been proven or disproven, but the details of the diary were sent with legitimate tax documents.  Smoke & fire and all that.

This actually is not true. The existence of the diary and its contents was validated when the person who obtained it was arrested, charged, and convicted of stealing it.

A Florida woman who stole and then sold a diary and other items belonging to Ashley Biden — the daughter of President Joe Biden — to a right-wing media group weeks before the 2020 election was sentenced Tuesday to one month in federal jail and three months of home detention.

You cannot jail someone for stealing something that does not exist. That she spoke of multiple instances of molestation and "hyper sexualiztion" also cannot be denied.



It can be ignored by mainstream media because it doesn't fit the narrative of Ice Cream Jack. It can be ignored by people who are blinded by loyalty to false idols. But it's right there in her own, verified, handwriting.

Don't jump!

friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

jmar

  • ****
  • 10290
Re: What would it take?
« Reply #118 on: April 19, 2024, 05:06:47 PM »
In my house it does! The Snake charmer verifies it daily with the example below:

It’s either…

“Yes, Honey. I want you.”

OR

“Don’t touch me!”


The 2nd one is far more frequent now that she has a bun in the oven.
Yes and I would even venture to say that these two opposing responses are universal since man has walked the earth. One might however have some hot charming success late initial phase and during the second trimester, buns and all. The correct food suggestion or bribe is all important at this stage. Get to fetching!
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

wesfau2

  • ***
  • 13581
  • I love it when you call me Big Poppa
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You can keep a wooden stake in your trunk
On the off-chance that the fairy tales ain't bunk
And Imma keep a bottle of that funk
To get motel parking lot, balcony crunk.