My whole point to this is Paterno had prior knowledge of his actions. No way the GA telling him his former coach was doing the Great Sandusky in the shower with a kid was the first he knew of it. An investigation was run years before on Sandusky taking a kid in the shower. PSU apparently took some form of action to cover themselves in part by having the coach step down. So when Paterno was told in 2002, he basically did nothing. He told his superior? Hell, they already knew. Paterno played as much a part in the cover up as anyone on that campus. He told his superior but when he saw they did not bring the police into it, he should have acted himself. Unless he had no intention of doing anything other than covering it up.
BTW, I was wrong. No evidence Paterno knew about the 1998-99 incident. Only that he was made aware of something inappropriate in 2002. He told his bosses.
Call the media? Call the police?
That's not his place.
He told who he was supposed to tell. Followed the rules. You don't know what his contract says. He might be prohibited from talking outside of school about shit. He may have been specifically told not to.
Nobody's going to run to the media or the cops in opposition of their bosses. Not even you (collective you, not individual). Not when they don't know the entire situation and there's no indication he did.
If he'd run to the media behind his bosses back? He'd have been fired anyway.
You want to start the crucifixion train?
What about Joseph Miller? Steve Turchetta? What about the parents who knew and let it go?
Why is Mike McQueary (great name) still going to be on staff when he saw (allegedly) with his own eyes that Sandusky was piledriving kids? How is that possibly the right move?